Gyroscopic exercise tool: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:50, 30 June 2024

Latest revision as of 17:23, 20 March 2025

(13 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Device used in physical therapy}}

{{about|the gyroscopic exercise tool and toy|the US lottery|Powerball|other "powerballs"|Powerball (disambiguation)}}

[[Image:Gyrotwister.jpg|thumb|A gyroscopic wrist exerciser.]]

[[File:Video of a complete use session with a gyroscopic exercise tool.webm|thumb|Video showing the use - from starting the rotation with a 'shoestring' over various movements with the holding hand until stopping the rotor with the second hand. The demonstrated speeds are, in part, very high and not recommended for normal exercise due to the high resulting high forces.]]

A '''gyroscopic exercise tool''' is a specialized device used in [[physical therapy]] to improve wrist strength and promote the development of palm, wrist, forearm, and finger muscles. It can also be used as a unique demonstration of some aspects of [[dynamics (physics)|rotational dynamics]]. The device consists of a [[tennis ball]]-sized plastic or metal shell surrounding a free-spinning mass, with an inner heavy core, which can be spun by a short rip string or using a self-start mechanism by means of rewinding it against a spring to give it [[potential energy]]. Once the [[gyroscope]] inside is going fast enough, the person holding the device can accelerate the spinning mass to high rotation rates by moving the wrist in a circular motion. The force enacted on the user increases as the speed of the inner gyroscope increases.

==Mechanics==

{{Disputed section|Friction based explanation is wrong|date = March 2025}}

{{Tone|date=March 2024}}

Inside the outer shell, the spinning mass is fixed to a thin metal [[axle]], each end trapped in a circular, equatorial groove in the outer shell. A lightweight ring with two notches for the axle ends rests in the groove. This ring can slip in the groove, allowing for the ball to spin perpendicular to the rotational axis of the ring.

To increase the rate[[angular of rotationvelocity]] of the ball, the sides of the groove to exert forces on the ends of the axle. The normal and axial forces will have no effect, so the tangential force must be provided by the [[friction]] of the ring acting on the axle. The user can apply a [[torque]] on the ball by tilting the shell in any direction except in the plane of the groove or around an axis aligned with the axle. The tilting results in a shift of the axle ends along the groove. The direction and speed of the shift can be found from the formula for the [[precession]] of a [[gyroscope]]: the applied torque is equal to the [[cross product]] of the [[angular velocity]] of precession and the [[angular momentum]] of the spinning mass. The rate of rotation of the internal ball increases as the total amount of torque applied is increased. The direction of the torque does not matter, as long as it is perpendicular to the plane of rotation of the ball. The friction of the ring increases on the other side of the side opposite to the plane of rotation. This process obeys symmetry across the plane perpendicular to the axle. The only restriction to this process is that the relative speed of the surface of the axle and the side of the groove due to precession, <math>\mathit{\Omega}_{\mathrm{P}} R_{\mathrm{groove}}</math>, must exceed the relative speed due to the rotation of the spinning mass, <math>\omega r_{\mathrm{axle}}</math>. The minimum torque required to meet this condition is <math> I \omega^2 \left( r_{\mathrm{axle}} / R_{\mathrm{groove}} \right) </math>, where '''I''' is the [[moment of inertia]] of the spinning mass, and '''ω''' is its [[Angular velocity|angular velocity.]].

Since the[[angular rotationacceleration]] will accelerateoccur regardless of the direction of the applied torque, as long as it is large enough, the device will function without any fine-tuning of the driving motion. The tilting of the shell does not have to have a particular rhythm with the precession or even have the same frequency. Since sliding (kinetic) [[Friction|kinetic friction]] is usually nearlyalmost as strong as [[StaticFriction|static friction|static]] (sticking) friction for the materials usuallytypically used, it is not necessary to apply preciselyexactly the valueamount of torque whichneeded will result infor the axle rollingto roll without slipping along the side of the groove. These factors allow beginners to learn to speed up the rotation after only a few minutes of practice.

By applying the proportionality of the [[Friction|kinetic force of friction]] to the [[normal force]], <math>F_f_\mathrm{fk} = \mu_\mathrm{k} F_\mathrm{n}</math>, where <math>\mu_\mathrm{k}</math> is the [[Friction#Coefficient_of_friction|kinetic coefficient of friction]], it can be shown that the [[torque]] spinning up the mass is a factor of <math>\mu_\mathrm{k} \left( r_{\mathrm{axle}} / R_{\mathrm{groove}} \right)</math> smaller than the torque applied to the shell. Since frictional force is essential for the device's operation, the groove must not be lubricated as to allow for the friction of the ring to enact a force on the gyro.<ref>{{cite journal |title=The Physics of the ''Dyna Bee'' |date=February 1, 1980 |issn=0031-921X |doi=10.1119/1.2340452 |issue=2 |volume=18 |pages=147–8 |journal=The Physics Teacher |first=J. |last=Higbie|bibcode=1980PhTea..18..147H}} {{closed access}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Roller Ball Dynamics |date=2000 |issue=9 |volume=36 |journal=Mathematics Today |first=P. G. |last=Heyda}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Roller Ball Dynamics Revisited |date=October 1, 2002 |issn=0002-9505 |doi=10.1119/1.1499508 |issue=10 |volume=70 |pages=1049–51 |journal=American Journal of Physics |first=P. G. |last=Heyda|bibcode=2002AmJPh..70.1049H}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=On the Dynamics of the Dynabee |date=June 1, 2000 |issn=0021-8936 |doi=10.1115/1.1304914 |issue=2 |volume=67 |pages=321–5 |journal=Journal of Applied Mechanics |first1=D. W. |last1=Gulick |first2=O. M. |last2=O’Reilly|bibcode=2000JAM....67..321G}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Modelling of the Robotic Powerball®: A Nonholonomic, Underactuated and Variable Structure-Type System |date=June 1, 2010 |doi=10.1080/13873954.2010.484237 |first1=Tadej |last1=Petrič |first2=Boris |last2=Curk |first3=Peter |last3=Cafuta |first4=Leon |last4=Žlajpah |journal=Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems|volume=16|issue=4 |pages=327–346 |hdl=10.1080/13873954.2010.484237 |s2cid=120513329 |hdl-access=free}}</ref>

By applying the proportionality of the force of friction to the normal force, <math>F_\mathrm{f} = \mu_\mathrm{k} F_\mathrm{n}</math>, where <math>\mu_\mathrm{k}</math> is the [[Friction#Coefficient_of_friction|kinetic coefficient of friction]], it can be shown that the torque spinning up the mass is a factor of <math>\mu_\mathrm{k} \left( r_{\mathrm{axle}} / R_{\mathrm{groove}} \right)</math> smaller than the torque applied to the shell. Since frictional force is essential for the device's operation, the groove must not be lubricated as to allow for the friction of the ring to enact a force on the gyro.<ref>{{cite journal |title=The Physics of the ''Dyna Bee'' |date=February 1, 1980 |issn=0031-921X |doi=10.1119/1.2340452 |issue=2 |volume=18 |pages=147–8 |journal=The Physics Teacher |first=J. |last=Higbie|bibcode=1980PhTea..18..147H}} {{closed access}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Roller Ball Dynamics |date=2000 |issue=9 |volume=36 |journal=Mathematics Today |first=P. G. |last=Heyda}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Roller Ball Dynamics Revisited |date=October 1, 2002 |issn=0002-9505 |doi=10.1119/1.1499508 |issue=10 |volume=70 |pages=1049–51 |journal=American Journal of Physics |first=P. G. |last=Heyda|bibcode=2002AmJPh..70.1049H}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=On the Dynamics of the Dynabee |date=June 1, 2000 |issn=0021-8936 |doi=10.1115/1.1304914 |issue=2 |volume=67 |pages=321–5 |journal=Journal of Applied Mechanics |first1=D. W. |last1=Gulick |first2=O. M. |last2=O’Reilly|bibcode=2000JAM....67..321G}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Modelling of the Robotic Powerball®: A Nonholonomic, Underactuated and Variable Structure-Type System |date=June 1, 2010 |doi=10.1080/13873954.2010.484237 |first1=Tadej |last1=Petrič |first2=Boris |last2=Curk |first3=Peter |last3=Cafuta |first4=Leon |last4=Žlajpah |journal=Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems|volume=16|issue=4 |pages=327–346 |hdl=10.1080/13873954.2010.484237 |s2cid=120513329 |hdl-access=free}}</ref>

==References==

{{reflist}}