Talk:Upside-down question and exclamation marks/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:28, 2 November 2023

Latest revision as of 15:59, 23 March 2025

(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)

Line 182:

:Agreed, this needlessly confuses matters at the head of the article, I have changed it accordingly. [[User:VerPerson|VerPerson]] ([[User talk:VerPerson|talk]]) 17:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

==Real Academia==

All of these should be but into italics, due to the fact that they are all in another language. I won't do it unless it is confirmed with a person better in grammer then I am.

[[Special:Contributions/66.41.83.205|66.41.83.205]] ([[User talk:66.41.83.205|talk]]) 23:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

:But all example sentences are put into italic. [[Special:Contributions/27.3.74.193|27.3.74.193]] ([[User talk:27.3.74.193|talk]]) 14:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

==ATENTION==

Sorry but inverted exclamation mark and interrogation mark are not used in written PORTUGUESE. do you know why? ¡¡¡¡¡Because I'm PORTUGUESE!!!!!

I'm editing here to say just that you have another mistake, not just in portuguese, both exclamation and interrogation marks are also not used in galician, as someone affirms at the beginning of this article. Please fix that. BTW I'm attaching here a link to the Normativa oficial do galego (galician official normative). You can also consult it to RAG (Real Academia Galega), the official institution which decides the normative. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/83.165.19.115|83.165.19.115]] ([[User talk:83.165.19.115#top|talk]]) 19:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

{{Clear}}

== ¿Why does the article not cover the inverted Interrobang? Maybe, we should add inverted Interrobang and shorten the name of the article to "Inverted Punctuation". ==

Line 208 ⟶ 192:

"Why does the article not cover the inverted Interrobang?" My answer would be "likely because noone has added material for it". That is, [[WP:BOLD|boldly]] go ahead! The worst case is you're reverted, and the reverting editor would then have to argue why your material didn't hold up. At the very least, he or she would have to suggest another article better suited to your material. Cheers [[User:CapnZapp|CapnZapp]] ([[User talk:CapnZapp|talk]]) 09:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

== Dialects ==