Talk:Generic Security Services Application Programming Interface: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
SamHartman (talk | contribs) document problems |
m Phiarc moved page Talk:Generic Security Services Application Program Interface to Talk:Generic Security Services Application Programming Interface: proper name per rfc |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Cryptography |importance=Low}}
}}
{{Technical|date=September 2010}}
== List of GSSAPI implementations ==
Line 10 ⟶ 14:
*Shishi [http://www.gnu.org/software/shishi/],
*SSPI [http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/secauthn/security/authentication_functions.asp] (wire-compat only),
*SAP [ftp://ftp.sap.com/pub/ietf-work/gssapi/gsskrb5/],
**SAP is not a GSS-API implementation; it simply uses GSS-API [[User:SamHartman|SamHartman]] 21:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
but who else?
Line 21 ⟶ 25:
application. I don't know how many of them (if any) are or have
ever participated in IETF activities. Here's a quick list of companies:
ietf mechanism: Company (Country)
Kerberos 5 MIT, CyberSafe, CA/Platinum, Microsoft, heimdal
SPKM Entrust (CA), Shym (US), Baltimore (US)
proprietary mechanisms:
AM-DCE Bull (FR)
(propr.) Sagem (FR)
Line 42 ⟶ 46:
kobil Kobil GmbH (DE)
T-Secure secunet/Telekom (DE)
how many do you recognize?
|