Talk:Procedural programming/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 01:08, 3 September 2023 edit Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Page movers 2,447,947 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Talk:Procedural programming) (bot ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 11:25, 4 April 2025 edit undo Graham87 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Importers, Rollbackers, Temporary account IP viewers 297,845 edits add version with original automated unsigned notice
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 46: The resource spend and speed are clear, also you can see a tendency. --[[User:Magallanes\|Magallanes]] 14:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC) == Comparison with object-oriented programming == I would like to see less of the editorial slant in favor of OOP in that topic. For example, instead of using phrases like "it's undeniable that OOP is better at" please use phrases like "Many people believe that OOP is better at". Also, I would like to see some more information about how POP can be superior to OOP. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages\|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/24.8.163.210\|24.8.163.210]] ([[User talk:24.8.163.210\|talk]]) 13:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> == C# and Java as Procedural Languages ==