Content deleted Content added
Added theoretical resonances |
m Open access bot: arxiv updated in citation with #oabot. |
||
Line 121:
|→
|{{nuclide|link=yes|carbon|10}} *
|}Experimental and theoretical analyses rule out the first and third reactions.<ref name="o946">{{cite journal |last=Cyburt |first=Richard H. |last2=Fields |first2=Brian D. |last3=Olive |first3=Keith A. |last4=Yeh |first4=Tsung-Han |date=2016-02-23 |title=Big bang nucleosynthesis: Present status |url=https://link.aps.org/accepted/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015004 |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=88 |issue=1 |page= |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015004 |issn=0034-6861 |access-date=2025-03-30 |doi-access=free|arxiv=1505.01076 }}</ref>
''[[BBC Science Focus]]'' wrote in 2023 that "recent research seems to completely discount" such theories; the magazine held that mainstream lithium nucleosynthesis calculations are probably correct.<ref name=BBC2023>{{cite news |url=https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/lithium-shortage-universe/ |title=The lithium problem: Why the element keeps disappearing |work=BBC Science Focus Magazine |date=16 June 2023 |author=Alastair Gunn |access-date=17 June 2023}}</ref>
| |||