Cosmological lithium problem: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:28, 9 May 2020

Latest revision as of 05:53, 7 April 2025

(61 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Problem in astronomy}}

{{short description|Discrepancy between the observed abundance of lithium produced in Big Bang nucleosynthesis and the amount that should theoretically exist.}}

In [[astronomy]], the '''lithium problem''' or '''lithium discrepancy''' refers to the discrepancy between the primordial [[Abundance of the chemical elements|abundance]] of [[lithium]] as inferred from observations of metal-poor ([[Stellar population|Population II]]) [[Stellar halo|halo stars]] in our Galaxygalaxy and the amount that should theoretically exist due to [[Big Bang nucleosynthesis]]+[[Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe|WMAP]] cosmic baryon density predictions of the [[Cosmiccosmic microwave background|CMB]] (CMB). Namely, the most widely accepted models of the Big Bang suggest that three times as much primordial lithium, in particular [[lithium-7]], should exist.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1146/annurev-nucl-102010-130445 |title=The Primordial Lithium Problem |date=2011 |last1=Fields |first1=Brian D. |journal=Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science |volume=61 |pages=47–68 |arxiv=1203.3551 |bibcode=2011ARNPS..61...47F }}</ref> This contrasts with the observed abundance of isotopes of [[hydrogen]] (¹H and [[deuterium|²H]]) and [[helium]] ([[helium-3|³He]] and [[helium-4|⁴He]]) that are consistent with predictions.<ref name=HouStats>{{cite journal |lastlast1=Hou |firstfirst1=S. Q. |last2=He |first2=J.J. |last3=Parikh |first3=A. |last4=Kahl |first4=D. |last5=Bertulani |first5=C.A. |last6=Kajino |first6=T. |last7=Mathews |first7=G.J. |last8=Zhao |first8=G. |date=2017 |title=Non-extensive statistics to the cosmological lithium problem |journal=The Astrophysical Journal |volume=834 |issue=2 |pages= 165|doi=10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/165 |bibcode=2017ApJ...834..165H |arxiv=1701.04149 |s2cid=568182 |doi-access=free }}</ref> The discrepancy is highlighted in a so-called "Schramm plot", named in honor of astrophysicist [[David Schramm (astrophysicist)|David Schramm]], which depicts these primordial abundances as a function of cosmic baryon content from standard [[Big Bang nucleosynthesis|BBN]] predictions.

[[File:Schramm plot BBN review 2019.png|thumb|400px|This "Schramm plot"<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Tanabashi, | first1=M., et| allast2=Hagiwara | first2=K. (| last3=Hikasa | first3=K. | last4=Nakamura | first4=K. | last5=Sumino | first5=Y. | last6=Takahashi | first6=F. | last7=Tanaka | first7=J. | last8=Agashe | first8=K. | last9=Aielli | first9=G. | last10=Amsler | first10=C. | display-authors=5|collaboration=Particle Data Group),| Phys.title=Review Rev.of Particle Physics | journal=Physical Review D 98,| 030001publisher=American Physical Society (2018APS) | volume=98 | issue=3 | date=2018-08-17 | issn=2470-0010 | doi=10.1103/physrevd.98.030001 | page=030001| bibcode=2018PhRvD..98c0001T |doi-access=free| hdl=10044/1/68623 | hdl-access=free }} and 2019 update.</ref> depicts primordial abundances of ⁴He, D, ³He, and ⁷Li as a function of cosmic baryon content from standard BBN predictions. CMB predictions of 7Li⁷Li (narrow vertical bands, at 95% [[confidence level|CL]]) and the BBN D&nbsp;+&nbsp;⁴He concordance range (wider vertical bands, at 95% CL) should overlap with the observed light element abundances (yellow boxes) to be in agreement. This occurs in ⁴He and is well constrained in D, but is not the case for ⁷Li, where the observed Li observations lie a factor of 3−4 below the BBN+WMAP prediction.]]

==Origin of lithium==

Minutes after the Big Bang, the universe was made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, with trace amounts of lithium and beryllium, and negligibly small abundances of all heavier elements.<ref name="habitable"/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://physics.unc.edu/the-cosmological-lithium-problem/|title=Cosmological lithium problem|website=University of North Carolina|date=14 September 2020 }}</ref>

===Lithium synthesis in the Big Bang===

Line 37:

|}

The amount of lithium generated in the Big Bang can be calculated.<ref>{{cite journal | bibcode= 1985ARA&A..23..319B | title= Big bang nucleosynthesis – Theories and observations | last1= Boesgaard | first1=A. M. | last2= Steigman | first2= G. | volume= 23 |date= 1985 | pages= 319–378 | journal= [[Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics]] |id=A86-14507 04–90 |___location=Palo Alto, CA | doi= 10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001535}}</ref> [[Hydrogen-1]] is the most abundant [[nuclide]], comprising roughly 92% of the atoms in the Universe, with [[helium-4]] second at 8%. Other isotopes including ²H, ³H, ³He, ⁶Li, ⁷Li, and ⁷Be are much rarer; the estimated abundance of primordial lithium is 10⁻¹⁰ relative to hydrogen.<ref name=23bbn>{{cite book |last1=Tanabashi |first1=M. |display-authors=et al. |editor-last1=Fields |editor-first1=B. D. |editor-last2=Molaro |editor-first2=P. |editor-last3=Sarkar |editor-first3=S. |title=The Review |date=2018 |chapter=Big-bang nucleosynthesis |journal=Physical Review D |volume=98 |issue=3 |pages=377–382 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001 |bibcode=2018PhRvD..98c0001T |url=https://pdg.lbl.gov/2019/reviews/rpp2018-rev-bbang-nucleosynthesis.pdf

}}</ref> The calculated abundance and ratio of ¹H and ⁴He is in agreement with data from observations of young stars.<ref name="habitable">{{cite book |isbn=978-0691140063|title=How to Build a Habitable Planet: The Story of Earth from the Big Bang to Humankind|last1=Langmuir|first1=C. H.|last2=Broecker|first2=W. S.|year=2012|publisher=Princeton University Press }}</ref>

===The P-P II branch===

Line 52:

-->:{| border="0"

|- style="height:2em;"

|{{nuclide|link=yes|helium|3}}&nbsp;||+&nbsp;||{{nuclide|link=yes|helium|4}}&nbsp;||→&nbsp;||{{nuclide|link=yes|beryllium|7}}&nbsp;||+&nbsp;||{{math|{{SubatomicParticle|link=yes|Gamma}}}}

|- style="height:2em;"

|{{nuclide|link=yes|beryllium|7}}&nbsp;||+&nbsp;||{{SubatomicParticle|link=yes|Electron}}&nbsp;||→&nbsp;||{{nuclide|link=yes|lithium|7|charge=-}}&nbsp;||+&nbsp;||{{math|{{SubatomicParticle|link=yes|Electron Neutrino}}}}&nbsp;||+&nbsp;||{{val|0.861|u=MeV}}&nbsp;||/&nbsp;||{{val|0.383|u=MeV}}

|- style="height:2em;"

|{{nuclide|link=yes|lithium|7}}&nbsp;||+&nbsp;||{{nuclide|link=yes|hydrogen|1}}&nbsp;||→&nbsp;||2&nbsp;{{nuclide|link=yes|helium|4}}

Line 65:

==Observed abundance of lithium==

Despite the low theoretical abundance of lithium, the actual observable amount is less than the calculated amount by a factor of 3-43–4.<ref name=fields11>{{cite journal |last=Fields |first=B. D. |date=2011 |title=The primordial lithium problem |journal=[[Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science]] |volume=61 |issue=1 |pages=47–68 |doi=10.1146/annurev-nucl-102010-130445| doi-access=free |arxiv=1203.3551 |bibcode=2011ARNPS..61...47F}}</ref> This contrasts with the observed abundance of isotopes of [[hydrogen]] (¹H and [[deuterium|²H]]) and [[helium]] ([[helium-3|³He]] and [[helium-4|⁴He]]) that are consistent with predictions.<ref name=HouStats/>

[[Image:SolarSystemAbundances.svg|thumb|center|800px|Abundances of the chemical elements in the Solar System. Hydrogen and helium are most common, residuals within the paradigm of the Big Bang.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Stiavelli |first1=M. |year=2009 |title=From First Light to Reionization the End of the Dark Ages |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iCLNBElRTS4C&pg=PA8 |page=8 |publisher=[[Wiley-VCH]] |___location=Weinheim, Germany |isbn=9783527627370|bibcode=2009fflr.book.....S }}</ref> Li, Be and B are rare because they are poorly synthesized in the Big Bang and also in stars; the main source of these elements is [[cosmic ray spallation]].]]

Older stars seem to have less lithium than they should, and some younger stars have much more.<ref name="MWoo">{{cite web|title=The Cosmic Explosions That Made the Universe|url=http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170220-the-cosmic-explosions-that-made-the-universe|last=Woo|first=M.|date=21 Feb 2017|website=earth|publisher=BBC|url-status=live|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170221214442/http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170220-the-cosmic-explosions-that-made-the-universe|archivedate=21 February 2017|access-date=21 Feb 2017|quote=A mysterious cosmic factory is producing lithium. Scientists are now getting closer at finding out where it comes from|df=dmy-all}}</ref> TheOne lackproposed ofmodel is that lithium inproduced olderduring starsa star's youth sinks beneath the star's atmosphere (where it is apparentlyobscured causedfrom bydirect observation) due to effects the authors describe as "turbulent mixing" ofand lithium"diffusion," intowhich theare interiorsuggested ofto stars,increase whereor itaccumulate isas destroyed,the star ages.<ref name=cld>{{Cite newsjournal |last1=Richard |first1=O. |last2=Michaud |first2=G. |last3=Richer |first3=J. |date=2005-01-20 |title=Implications of WMAP Observations on Li Abundance and Stellar Evolution Models |url=httphttps://wwwdoi.universetodayorg/10.com1086/476426470 |journal=The Astrophysical Journal |language=en |volume=619 |issue=1 |pages=538–548 |doi=10.1086/why426470 |arxiv=astro-oldph/0409672 |bibcode=2005ApJ...619..538R |s2cid=14299934 |issn=0004-637X}}</ref> Spectroscopic observations of stars in [[NGC 6397]], a metal-seem-to-lack-poor globular cluster, are consistent with an inverse relation between lithium/ abundance and age, but a theoretical mechanism for diffusion has not been formalized.<ref>{{Cite journal |titlelast1=WhyKorn Old|first1=A. StarsJ. Seem|last2=Grundahl to|first2=F. Lack|last3=Richard Lithium|first3=O. |datelast4=16Barklem August|first4=P. 2006S. |lastlast5=CainMashonkina |firstfirst5=FL. |url-statuslast6=liveCollet |archiveurlfirst6=https://webR.archive |last7=Piskunov |first7=N.org/web/20160604044857/http |last8=Gustafsson |first8=B. |date=August 2006 |title=A probable stellar solution to the cosmological lithium discrepancy |url=https://www.universetodaynature.com/476/why-old-stars-seem-to-lack-lithiumarticles/nature05011 |archivedatejournal=4Nature June|language=en 2016|volume=442 |issue=7103 |pages=657–659 |doi=10.1038/nature05011 |pmid=16900193 |dfarxiv=dmyastro-allph/0608201 |bibcode=2006Natur.442..657K |s2cid=3943644 |issn=1476-4687}}</ref> while lithium is produced in younger stars. Though it [[lithium burning|transmutes]] into two atoms of [[helium]] due to collision with a [[proton]] at temperatures above 2.4 million degrees Celsius (most stars easily attain this temperature in their interiors), lithium is more abundant than current computations would predict in later-generation stars.<ref name=emsley/><ref name="Cain">{{cite web|url=http://www.universetoday.com/24593/brown-dwarf/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110225032434/http://www.universetoday.com/24593/brown-dwarf/|archivedate=25 February 2011|title=Brown Dwarf |accessdate=17 November 2009 |last=Cain |first=F.Fraser |publisher=Universe Today}}</ref>

[[File:Nova Centauri 2013 ESO.jpg|thumb|[[Nova Centauri 2013]] is the first in which evidence of lithium has been found.<ref>{{cite web|title=First Detection of Lithium from an Exploding Star|url=http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1531/|accessdate=29 July 2015|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150801001700/http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1531/|archivedate=1 August 2015|df=dmy-all}}</ref>]]

Lithium is also found in [[brown dwarf]] substellar objects and certain anomalous orangemetal-poor stars. Because lithium is present in cooler, less- massive brown dwarfs, but is destroyed in hotter [[red dwarf]] stars, its presence in the stars' spectra can be used in the "lithium test" to differentiate the two, as both are smaller than the Sun.<ref name=emsley/><ref name="Cain"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www-int.stsci.edu/~inr/ldwarf3.html |archive-url=https://archive.istoday/20130521055905/http://www-int.stsci.edu/~inr/ldwarf3.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=21 May 2013 |title=L Dwarf Classification|accessdate=6 March 2013 | first =N. | last = Reid | date = 10 March 2002}}</ref>

<!-- dummy edit to identify attribution ; can be deleted. -->

Lithium is also found in [[brown dwarf]] substellar objects and certain anomalous orange stars. Because lithium is present in cooler, less-massive brown dwarfs, but is destroyed in hotter [[red dwarf]] stars, its presence in the stars' spectra can be used in the "lithium test" to differentiate the two, as both are smaller than the Sun.<ref name=emsley/><ref name="Cain"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www-int.stsci.edu/~inr/ldwarf3.html |archive-url=https://archive.is/20130521055905/http://www-int.stsci.edu/~inr/ldwarf3.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=21 May 2013 |title=L Dwarf Classification|accessdate=6 March 2013 | first =N. | last = Reid | date = 10 March 2002}}</ref>

===Less lithium in Sun-like stars with planets===

StarsSun-like stars without planets have 10 times the lithium as Sun-like stars with planets in a sample of 500 stars.<ref name="Discover">{{cite journal |url=https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/want-a-planet-you-might-want-to-avoid-lithium |last1=Plait |first1=P. |authorlink1=Phil Plait |journal= Discover| title=Want a planet? You might want to avoid lithium |date=11 November 2009}}</ref> The sun has 1% of the amount of lithium in gas clouds. It is suspected that the gravitational pull of planets might churn up a star's surface, driving the lithium to hotter cores where [[lithium burning]] occurs.<ref name ="Discover"/> The absence of lithium could also be a way to find new planetary systems.<ref name="DiscoverIsraelian"/>

{{Cite journal

|last1=Israelian |first1=G.

|display-authors=etal

|date = 2009

|title = Enhanced lithium depletion in Sun-like stars with orbiting planets

|journal = [[Nature (journal)|Nature]]

|volume =462|issue=7270| pages=189–191

|doi=10.1038/nature08483

|pmid = 19907489

|bibcode=2009Natur.462..189I

|arxiv = 0911.4198

|s2cid=388656

|quote=<span style="font-family:LatinModern;"><small>... confirm the peculiar behaviour of Li in the effective temperature range 5600–5900 K ... We found that the immense majority of planet host stars have severely depleted lithium ... At higher and lower temperatures planet-host stars do not appear to show any peculiar behaviour in their Li abundance.</small></span>}}</ref> The Sun's surface layers have less than 1% the lithium of the original formation [[Formation and evolution of the Solar System#Formation|protosolar gas clouds]] despite the surface convective zone not being quite hot enough to burn lithium.<ref name = "Israelian"/> It is suspected that the gravitational pull of planets might enhance the churning up of the star's surface, driving the lithium to hotter cores where [[lithium burning]] occurs.<ref name="Discover"/><ref name = "Israelian"/> The absence of lithium could also be a way to find new planetary systems.<ref name="Discover"/> However, this claimed relationship has become a point of contention in the planetary astrophysics community, being frequently denied<ref name="BaumannRamírez2010">{{cite journal|last1=Baumann|first1=P.|last2=Ramírez|first2=I.|last3=Meléndez|first3=J.|last4=Asplund|first4=M.|last5=Lind|first5=K.|display-authors=2|title=Lithium depletion in solar-like stars: no planet connection|journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics|volume=519|year=2010|pages=A87|issn=0004-6361|doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201015137|arxiv=1008.0575 |bibcode=2010A&A...519A..87B |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="RamírezFish2012">{{cite journal|last1=Ramírez|first1=I.|last2=Fish|first2=J. R.|last3=Lambert|first3=D. L.|last4=Allende Prieto|first4=C.|display-authors=2|title=Lithium abundances in nearby FGK dwarf and subgiant stars: internal destruction, galactic chemical evolution, and exoplanets|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|volume=756|issue=1|year=2012|pages=46|issn=0004-637X|doi=10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/46|arxiv=1207.0499 |bibcode=2012ApJ...756...46R |hdl=2152/34872|s2cid=119199829 |hdl-access=free}}</ref> but also supported.<ref name="FigueiraFaria2014">{{cite journal|last1=Figueira|first1=P.|last2=Faria|first2=J. P.|last3=Delgado-Mena|first3=E.|last4=Adibekyan|first4=V. Zh.|last5=Sousa|first5=S. G.|last6=Santos|first6=N. C.|last7=Israelian|first7=G.|display-authors=2|title=Exoplanet hosts reveal lithium depletion|journal=Astronomy & Astrophysics|volume=570|year=2014|pages=A21|issn=0004-6361|doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201424218|doi-access=free|arxiv=1409.0890}}</ref><ref name="Delgado MenaIsraelian2014">{{cite journal|last1=Delgado Mena|first1=E.|last2=Israelian|first2=G.|last3=González Hernández|first3=J. I.|last4=Sousa|first4=S. G.|last5=Mortier|first5=A.|last6=Santos|first6=N. C.|last7=Adibekyan|first7=V. Zh.|last8=Fernandes|first8=J.|last9=Rebolo|first9=R.|last10=Udry|first10=S.|last11=Mayor|first11=M.|display-authors=2|title=Li depletion in solar analogues with exoplanets|journal=Astronomy & Astrophysics|volume=562|year=2014|pages=A92|issn=0004-6361|doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201321493|doi-access=free|arxiv=1311.6414}}</ref>

===Higher than expected lithium in metal-poor stars===

Certain orangemetal-poor stars can also contain aan abnormally high concentration of lithium.<ref name="high">{{cite journal |doi=10.3847/2041-8213/aaa438|title=Enormous Li Enhancement Preceding Red Giant Phases in Low-mass Stars in the Milky Way Halo|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|volume=852|issue=2|pages=L31|year=2018|last1=Li|first1=H. |last2=Aoki|first2=W. |last3=Matsuno|first3=T. |last4=Kumar|first4=Y. Bharat|last5=Shi|first5=J. |last6=Suda|first6=T. |last7=Zhao|first7=G. |last8=Zhao|first8=G.|bibcode=2018ApJ...852L..31L|arxiv=1801.00090|s2cid=54205417 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Those orangeThese stars foundtended to have a higher than usual concentration of lithium orbit massive objects—neutron stars or black holes—whose gravity evidently pulls heavier lithium to the surface of a hydrogen-helium star, causing more lithium to be observed.<ref name=emsley>{{Cite book|last=Emsley |first=J. |title=Nature's Building Blocks |publisher=Oxford University Press |___location=Oxford|date=2001 |isbn=978-0-19-850341-5}}</ref>

==Proposed solutions==

Line 88 ⟶ 100:

=== Astrophysical solutions ===

Considering the possibility that BBN predictions are sound, the measured value of the primordial Lithiumlithium abundance should be in error and astrophysical solutions offer revision to it. For example, systematic errors, including ionization correction and inaccurate stellar temperatures determination could affect Li/H ratios in stars. Furthermore, more observations on Lithiumlithium depletion remain important since present Lithiumlithium levellevels might not reflect the initial abundance in the star. In summary, accurate measurements of the primordial Lithiumlithium abundance is the current focus of progress, and it could be possible that the final answer does not lie in astrophysical solutions.<ref name="fields11" />

Some astronomers suggest that the velocities of nucleons do not follow a [[Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution]]. They test the framework of Tsallis non-extensive statistics. Their result suggest that {{nowrap|1.069 < q < 1.082}} is a possible new solution to the cosmological lithium problem.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hou |first1=S. Q. |last2=He |first2=J. J. |last3=Parikh |first3=A. |last4=Kahl |first4=D. |last5=Bertulani |first5=C. A. |last6=Kajino |first6=T. |last7=Mathews |first7=G. J. |last8=Zhao |first8=G. |title=Non-Extensive Statistics to the Cosmological Lithium Problem |date=2017-01-11 |journal=The Astrophysical Journal |volume=834 |issue=2 |pages=165 |doi=10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/165 |arxiv=1701.04149 |bibcode=2017ApJ...834..165H |s2cid=568182 |issn=1538-4357 |doi-access=free }}</ref>

=== Nuclear Physics solutions ===

Now consider the possibility that the measured primordial Lithium abundance is correct and based on the [[Standard Model]] of particle physics and the standard cosmology, then the Lithium problem implies errors in the BBN light element predictions. Although standard BBN rests on well-determined physics, the weak and strong interactions are complicated for BBN and therefore might be the weak point in standard BBN calculation.<ref name="fields11" />

=== Nuclear Physicsphysics solutions ===

First, reactions missing or incorrect could lead to Lithium problem. For incorrect reactions, major thoughts lie within revision to cross-section errors and standard thermonuclear rates according to recent studies.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Angulo|first=C.|last2=Casarejos|first2=E.|last3=Couder|first3=M.|last4=Demaret|first4=P.|last5=Leleux|first5=P.|last6=Vanderbist|first6=F.|last7=Coc|first7=A.|last8=Kiener|first8=J.|last9=Tatischeff|first9=V.|last10=Davinson|first10=T.|last11=Murphy|first11=A. S.|date=September 2005|title=The 7Be(d,p)2α Cross Section at Big Bang Energies and the Primordial 7Li Abundance|url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...630L.105A/abstract|journal=ApJL|language=en|volume=630|issue=2|pages=L105–L108|doi=10.1086/491732|issn=0004-637X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Boyd|first=Richard N.|last2=Brune|first2=Carl R.|last3=Fuller|first3=George M.|last4=Smith|first4=Christel J.|date=November 2010|title=New nuclear physics for big bang nucleosynthesis|url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PhRvD..82j5005B/abstract|journal=PhRvD|language=en|volume=82|issue=10|pages=105005|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.82.105005|issn=1550-7998}}</ref>

NowWhen considerone considers the possibility that the measured primordial Lithiumlithium abundance is correct and based on the [[Standard Model]] of particle physics and the standard cosmology, then the Lithiumlithium problem implies errors in the BBN light element predictions. Although standard BBN rests on well-determined physics, the weak and strong interactions are complicated for BBN and therefore might be the weak point in standard BBN calculation.<ref name="fields11" />

SecondFirstly, startingincorrect fromor [[Fredmissing Hoyle]]'sreactions greatcould discoverygive ofrise [[carbon-12]]to resonance,the [[Resonancelithium (particleproblem. physics)|resonance]]For incorrect reactions, somemajor ofthoughts whichlie mightwithin haverevision evadedto experimental[[cross detectionsection or(physics)|cross whosesection]] effectserrors haveand beenstandard underestimated, becomethermonuclear possiblerates solutionsaccording to the Lithium problem and are studied by manyrecent recentlystudies.<ref>{{Cite journal|lastlast1=HammacheAngulo|firstfirst1=FC.|last2=CocCasarejos|first2=AE.|last3=de SérévilleCouder|first3=NM.|last4=StefanDemaret|first4=IP.|last5=RousselLeleux|first5=P.|last6=AncelinVanderbist|first6=SF.|last7=AssiéCoc|first7=MA.|last8=AudouinKiener|first8=LJ.|last9=BeaumelTatischeff|first9=DV.|last10=FranchooDavinson|first10=ST.|last11=Fernandez-DominguezMurphy|first11=BA. S.|date=DecemberSeptember 20132005|title=SearchThe for7Be(d,p)2α newCross resonantSection statesat inBig 10CBang and 11CEnergies and their impact on the cosmologicalPrimordial lithium7Li problem|url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PhRvC..88f2802H/abstractAbundance|journal=PhRvCAstrophysical Journal Letters|language=en|volume=88630|issue=62|pages=062802L105–L108|doi=10.11031086/PhysRevC491732|arxiv=astro-ph/0508454 |bibcode=2005ApJ.88.062802.630L.105A |issn=05560004-637X|doi-2813access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|lastlast1=O'MalleyBoyd|firstfirst1=P.Richard DN.|last2=BardayanBrune|first2=D.Carl WR.|last3=AdekolaFuller|first3=A.George SM.|last4=AhnSmith|first4=S.|last5=Chae|first5=K.Christel Y.|last6=Cizewski|first6=J. A.|last7=Graves|first7=S.|last8=Howard|first8=M. E.|last9=Jones|first9=K. L.|last10=Kozub|first10=R. L.|last11=Lindhardt|first11=L.|date=OctoberNovember 20112010|title=SearchNew fornuclear aphysics resonantfor enhancementbig of the 7Be + d reaction and primordial 7Libang abundancesnucleosynthesis|url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PhRvC2010PhRvD..84d2801O82j5005B/abstract|journal=PhRvCPhysical Review D |language=en|volume=8482|issue=410|pages=042801105005|doi=10.1103/PhysRevCPhysRevD.8482.042801105005|issn=05561550-28137998|arxiv=1008.0848|bibcode=2010PhRvD..82j5005B |s2cid=119265813 }}</ref>

Second, starting from [[Fred Hoyle]]'s discovery of a [[Resonance (particle physics)|resonance]] in [[carbon-12]], an important factor in the [[triple-alpha process]], resonance reactions, some of which might have evaded experimental detection or whose effects have been underestimated, become possible solutions to the lithium problem.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Hammache|first1=F.|last2=Coc|first2=A.|last3=de Séréville|first3=N.|last4=Stefan|first4=I.|last5=Roussel|first5=P.|last6=Ancelin|first6=S.|last7=Assié|first7=M.|last8=Audouin|first8=L.|last9=Beaumel|first9=D.|last10=Franchoo|first10=S.|last11=Fernandez-Dominguez|first11=B.|date=December 2013|title=Search for new resonant states in 10C and 11C and their impact on the cosmological lithium problem|url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PhRvC..88f2802H/abstract|journal=Physical Review C|language=en|volume=88|issue=6|pages=062802|doi=10.1103/PhysRevC.88.062802|issn=0556-2813|arxiv=1312.0894|bibcode=2013PhRvC..88f2802H |s2cid=119110688 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=O'Malley|first1=P. D.|last2=Bardayan|first2=D. W.|last3=Adekola|first3=A. S.|last4=Ahn|first4=S.|last5=Chae|first5=K. Y.|last6=Cizewski|first6=J. A.|author6-link= Jolie Cizewski |last7=Graves|first7=S.|last8=Howard|first8=M. E.|last9=Jones|first9=K. L.|last10=Kozub|first10=R. L.|last11=Lindhardt|first11=L.|date=October 2011|title=Search for a resonant enhancement of the 7Be + d reaction and primordial 7Li abundances|url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PhRvC..84d2801O/abstract|journal=Physical Review C|language=en|volume=84|issue=4|pages=042801|doi=10.1103/PhysRevC.84.042801|bibcode=2011PhRvC..84d2801O |issn=0556-2813}}</ref> These include:

All these nuclear physics solutions are accessible in experimental validation, which make them highly possible resulted in a true answer.

{| border="0"

|- style="height:2em;"

|{{nuclide|link=yes|beryllium|7}}&nbsp;||+&nbsp;||{{nuclide|link=yes|hydrogen|2}}&nbsp;||→&nbsp;||{{nuclide|link=yes|boron|9}}&nbsp;*

|- style="height:2em;"

|{{nuclide|link=yes|beryllium|7}}&nbsp;||+&nbsp;||{{nuclide|link=yes|hydrogen|3}}&nbsp;||→&nbsp;||{{nuclide|link=yes|boron|10}}&nbsp;*

|-

|{{nuclide|link=yes|beryllium|7}}&nbsp;

| +&nbsp;

|{{nuclide|link=yes|helium|3}}&nbsp;

|→&nbsp;

|{{nuclide|link=yes|carbon|10}}&nbsp;*

|}Experimental and theoretical analyses rule out the first and third reactions.<ref name="o946">{{cite journal |last=Cyburt |first=Richard H. |last2=Fields |first2=Brian D. |last3=Olive |first3=Keith A. |last4=Yeh |first4=Tsung-Han |date=2016-02-23 |title=Big bang nucleosynthesis: Present status |url=https://link.aps.org/accepted/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015004 |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=88 |issue=1 |page= |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015004 |issn=0034-6861 |access-date=2025-03-30 |doi-access=free|arxiv=1505.01076 }}</ref>

''[[BBC Science Focus]]'' wrote in 2023 that "recent research seems to completely discount" such theories; the magazine held that mainstream lithium nucleosynthesis calculations are probably correct.<ref name=BBC2023>{{cite news |url=https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/lithium-shortage-universe/ |title=The lithium problem: Why the element keeps disappearing |work=BBC Science Focus Magazine |date=16 June 2023 |author=Alastair Gunn |access-date=17 June 2023}}</ref>

=== Beyond the Standard Model solutions ===

Under the assumptions of all correct calculation, solutions beyond the existing Standard Model or standard cosmology might be needed.<ref name="fields11" />

=== BeyondSolutions beyond the Standard Model solutions ===

Dark Matter Decay and [[Supersymmetry]] provide one possibility, in which  decaying dark matter scenarios introduce a rich array of novel processes that can alter light elements during and after BBN, and find the well-motivated origin in supersymmetric cosmologies. With fully operational [[Large Hadron Collider|LHC]], much of minimal supersymmetry lies within reach, which would revolutionize particle physics and cosmology if discovered.<ref name="fields11" />

Under the assumptions of all correct calculation, solutions [[beyond the standard model|beyond]] the existing [[Standard Model]] or standard cosmology might be needed.<ref name="fields11" />

Dark matter decay and [[supersymmetry]] provide one possibility, in which decaying dark matter scenarios introduce a rich array of novel processes that can alter light elements during and after BBN, and find the well-motivated origin in supersymmetric cosmologies. With the fully operational [[Large Hadron Collider]] (LHC), much of minimal supersymmetry lies within reach, which would revolutionize particle physics and cosmology if discovered;<ref name="fields11" /> however, results from the ATLAS experiment in 2020 have excluded many supersymmetric models.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Collaboration|first=Atlas|year=2021|title=Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}$ =13 TeV $pp$ collision data with the ATLAS detector|journal=Jhep |volume=02 |page=143 |language=en|doi=10.1007/JHEP02(2021)143|arxiv=2010.14293 |s2cid=256039464 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Sutter|first=Paul|date=2021-01-07|title=From squarks to gluinos: It's not looking good for supersymmetry|url=https://www.space.com/no-signs-supersymmetry-large-hadron-collider|access-date=2021-10-29|website=Space.com|language=en}}</ref>

Changing Fundamental Constants can be one possible solution, and it implies that first, atomic transitions in metals residing in high-redshift regions might behave differently from our own; second, Standard Model couplings and particle masses might vary; third, variation in nuclear physics parameters is needed.<ref name="fields11" />

Changing Fundamental[[fundamental Constantsconstants]] can be one possible solution, and it implies that first, atomic transitions in metals residing in high-[[redshift]] regions might behave differently from our own;. secondAdditionally, Standard Model couplings and particle masses might vary; third, and variation in nuclear physics parameters iswould be needed.<ref name="fields11" />

Nonstandard Cosmologies indicate variation of baryon to photon ratio in different regions. One proposal is a result of large-scale inhomogeneities in cosmic density, different from homogeneity defined in the [[cosmological principle]]. However, this possibility requires a large amount of observations to test it.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Holder|first=Gilbert P.|last2=Nollett|first2=Kenneth M.|last3=van Engelen|first3=Alexander|date=June 2010|title=On Possible Variation in the Cosmological Baryon Fraction|url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...716..907H/abstract|journal=ApJ|language=en|volume=716|issue=2|pages=907–913|doi=10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/907|issn=0004-637X}}</ref>

Nonstandard Cosmologiescosmologies indicate variation of the baryon to photon ratio in different regions. One proposal is a result of large-scale inhomogeneities in cosmic density, different from homogeneity defined in the [[cosmological principle]]. However, this possibility requires a large amount of observations to test it.<ref>{{Cite journal|lastlast1=Holder|firstfirst1=Gilbert P.|last2=Nollett|first2=Kenneth M.|last3=van Engelen|first3=Alexander|date=June 2010|title=On Possible Variation in the Cosmological Baryon Fraction|url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...716..907H/abstract|journal=ApJAstrophysical Journal|language=en|volume=716|issue=2|pages=907–913|doi=10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/907|arxiv=0907.3919 |bibcode=2010ApJ...716..907H |issn=0004-637X|doi-access=free}}</ref>

== See also ==

==See also==

* [[Big Bang]]

* [[Halo nucleus]]

* [[Isotopes of lithium]]

* [[List of unsolved problems in physics]]

* [[Lithium burning]]

==Further reading==

* {{cite journal |last1=Fields |first1=Brian D. |title=The Primordial Lithium Problem |journal=Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science |volume=61 |year=2011 |pages=47–68 |doi=10.1146/annurev-nucl-102010-130445 |arxiv=1203.3551|bibcode=2011ARNPS..61...47F }}

* {{cite journal |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.83.063006 |title=Resonant destruction as a possible solution to the cosmological lithium problem |date=2011 |last1=Chakraborty |first1=Nachiketa |last2=Fields |first2=Brian D. |last3=Olive |first3=Keith A. |journal=Physical Review D |volume=83 |issue=6 |page=063006 |arxiv=1011.0722 |bibcode=2011PhRvD..83f3006C }}

* {{cite journal |doi=10.1142/S0218301312500048 |title=Resonant Enhancement of Nuclear Reactions as a Possible Solution to the Cosmological Lithium Problem |date=2012 |last1=Cyburt |first1=Richard H. |last2=Pospelov |first2=Maxim |journal=International Journal of Modern Physics E |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=1250004-1-1250004-13 |arxiv=0906.4373 |bibcode=2012IJMPE..2150004C }}

* {{cite journal |last1=Hou |first1=S. Q. |last2=Yan |first2=H. L. |last3=Li |first3=X. Y. |last4=Zhou |first4=X. H. |last5=Sun |first5=B. |title=Non-Extensive Statistics to the Cosmological Lithium Problem |journal=The Astrophysical Journal |volume=834 |issue=2 |year=2017 |pages=165 |doi=10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/165 |doi-access=free |arxiv=1701.03700|bibcode=2017ApJ...834..165H }}

==References==