Wikipedia:Using maps and analogous media: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:45, 19 March 2023

Latest revision as of 19:40, 8 April 2025

(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Essay|WP:MAPCITE}}

{{Nutshell|[[Map|Maps]]s and [[Lineline chart|line charts]]s used as illustrations followare theequally samesubject rulesto asthe picturesguidelines that are used asfor illustrations.|Maps and line charts may be used as sources, butare equally subject to the core content policies of [[WP:V|Verifiabilityverifiability]], and [[WP:NOROR|Nono original research]] still apply.|It is not [[WP:OR|original research]] to extract information from a map or line chart using standard techniques, particularly if those techniquesemployed areacross common to two or moremultiple disciplines.|The core content policies of [[WP:V|Verifiability]], and [[WP:NOR|No original research]] apply to user-made maps.}}

[[File:1930 D&RGW WP.jpg|thumb|300pxupright=1.35|This map is a commercial map of the [[Denver and Rio Grande Western]] and [[Western Pacific Railroad]]s as they existed in 1914. This map is valuable as a source of information and as illustration for what it depicts. The map depicts the general route of the two railroads advertised, the route of their primary rivals, several long abandoned [[short line railroad]]s and short-lived mining [[boomtown]]s in the [[western United States]], and this map is used appropriately in articles about these subjects. However, the map's limitations should also be understood. Comparing this map with others will reveal that this commercial map is drawn on an inconsistent scale, perhaps to minimize the fact that the competing [[Overland Route (Union Pacific Railroad)|Overland Route]] is more direct than the route of the railroads advertised.]]

Any map or line chart used in Wikipedia should conform with Wikipedia's policies of [[WP:neutrality|neutrality]], [[WP:reliabilityverifiability|reliabilityverifiability]], and [[WP:verifiabilityNOR|verifiabilityno original research]]. Maps can be used for two purposes in Wikipedia articles, as sources or as illustration. Regardless of the point of using a map in an article, the following points should be kept in mind:

*The presence of an object on a map is not sufficient by itself to show [[WP:notability|notability]] of a subject.

*Even maps produced using reliable sources (such as [[GIS]] data) can have minor errors as a result of errors in the underlying database, or the cartographer trying to overlay data from two non-linear sources. Minor map errors are common, for that reason any map detail that is key to the article should be confirmed with a separate map from a different publisher. Rarely are map errors notable, even if they have gone uncorrected for decades.

*Many cartographers intentionally introduce minor errors in inconspicuous locations as a form of [[copyright trap]]. Likewise, rarely are such introductions notable.

*Many companies publish a yearly edition of a map, and include the year as part of the title (e.g. 2009 Road Atlas). As these have to be drafted in advance, often times the cartagrophercartographer will draw projects under construction as completed, or proposed projects as under construction. This is an effort to increase the shelf life of the map, so as to not be obsolete before the year on the edition name has finished. (e.g. a highway expected to be completed by 2009 may be drawn as complete in the 2009 edition, even though it was still under construction when the map was drafted) This can introduce another source of error in an otherwise reliable map, should a project be cancelled or significantly changed. Such errors can be detected by comparing multiple editions of the same map.

*Any cultural bias apparent in a map should be clearly explained in a neutral fashion. For example, Wikipedia's article about the [[Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute]] features side-by-side maps showing the rival naming conventions used by [[Argentina]] and the [[United Kingdom]] for the named features of the islands, without implying one is correct. In cases where it is not practical or possible to show maps from each POV in a boundary or sovereignty dispute, a caption should explain which details of the map are disputed.

*Editors who use maps should be aware that maps covering large areas almost always have one type of distortion or another, depending on the [[map projection]] used. Care should be taken to select a map whose projection is appropriate for the purpose to which it is being put.

Line 41:

==Description==

Maps are often used to provide a description of linear features, such as a waterway, mountain range, road, railroad, or pipeline, etc., when doing so a single map should not be used the sole source used to provide the description. While a map is useful to source details in a general description section, other types of sources should also be used, if available. For some subjects the only sources available will be maps and it will be necessary to have the entire general description sourced from maps. Keep in mind that different types of information will be visible depending on the type of map used (i.e. road map, political map, topographical map, or recreational map). Ideally a map of each of those types should at least be consulted in drafting a description, if not used. For example if only a road map is used, the summary would consist almost exclusively of road features, and neglect geographical or political considerations. Using different maps of the same type (e.g. two road maps from different publishers) would likely not enhance the description, however may provide value to confirm a suspected map error or controversial detail. If a description only contains details from one map, the reader could save time by just looking at the map to get this information. The author should remember that a good article will describe an object above and beyond what is visible in a map.

== See also ==

* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Maps/Conventions]], standard practices for displaying maps on Wikipedia

* [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Diagrams and maps]], an inactive style guideline proposal

* [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Using maps as sources]]

{{Essays on building Wikipedia}}