Content deleted Content added
→Broken Link: new section |
Undid revision 1284678300 by 2A02:9B0:4003:5B8B:51D8:1FAD:8F18:9EF8 (talk) ??? |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Low |science=yes |science-importance=Low |software=y |software-importance=Low |hardware=yes |hardware-importance=Low}} }}
== Title ==
Line 153 ⟶ 155:
no longer works for me. [[Special:Contributions/64.16.131.2|64.16.131.2]] ([[User talk:64.16.131.2|talk]]) 21:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
:Thanks for the information. I've just updated the URL. — [[User:Vincent Lefèvre|Vincent Lefèvre]] ([[User talk:Vincent Lefèvre|talk]]) 21:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
== request about discussion / seek consensus for the info about different understanding of the encodings ==
I added an info about 'integral understanding of the significand', fully backed by IEEE standard paper and with citation, the user Vincent Lefèvre like to delete it repeatedly. IMHO it's against WP policy about different opinions, he should seek consenus here!
== request to block user Vincent Lefèvre from 'silly reverts' ==
I am not the only user who is annoyed by stupid aggressive deletions by the user Vincent Lefèvre, see his talk page. Is there a way to stop this blockwart behavior?
|