Content deleted Content added
→Statement of the theorem: Thinking of the index as time is neither necessary nor sufficient to describe the role of the index set $T$. Tag: Reverted |
m Moving Category:Theorems regarding stochastic processes to Category:Theorems about stochastic processes per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 6:
==Statement of the theorem==
Let <math>T</math> denote some [[Interval (mathematics)|interval]] (thought of as "[[time]]"), and let <math>n \in \mathbb{N}</math>. For each <math>k \in \mathbb{N}</math> and finite [[sequence]] of distinct times <math>t_{1}, \dots, t_{k} \in T</math>, let <math>\nu_{t_{1} \dots t_{k}}</math> be a [[probability measure]] on <math>(\mathbb{R}^{n})^{k}.</math> Suppose that these measures satisfy two consistency conditions:
1. for all [[permutation]]s <math>\pi</math> of <math>\{ 1, \dots, k \}</math> and measurable sets <math>F_{i} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{n}</math>,
Line 74:
* Aldrich, J. (2007) [http://www.emis.de/journals/JEHPS/Decembre2007/Aldrich.pdf "But you have to remember P.J.Daniell of Sheffield"] [http://www.emis.de/journals/JEHPS/indexang.html Electronic Journ@l for History of Probability and Statistics] December 2007.
[[Category:Theorems
| |||