Talk:Ruby (programming language): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 12:14, 10 April 2025 edit Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Page movers 2,448,144 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Ruby (programming language)/Archive 1) (bot ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 12:13, 17 April 2025 edit undo Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Page movers 2,448,144 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Ruby (programming language)/Archive 1) (bot
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 82: ::::::I'd guess the "weird forking model" is they try to work in a single thread, to avoid any multithreading issues. The popularity seems only a question of usability (they don't ask modification of software or heavy configuration) and performance (benchmarks from Twitter or Deliveroo speaks about requests per seconds). The sources in the Unicorn and Puma article contains some hints about the adoption reasons. ::::::As I'm not a Ruby expert, I'd appreciate if you could review the articles to be sure they're readable. --[[User:Dereckson\|Dereckson]] ([[User talk:Dereckson\|talk]]) 13:04, 31 March 2018 (UTC) ~~== Keep "differences"? ==~~ About [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruby_(programming_language)&diff=769305703&oldid=765870761 this edit]. Is it bad to show differences? I didn't look over, saying any of them are true (or not). Just, if language A (Ruby) has for sure some syntax/semantics and some other language B something else, then ok with [[WP:V]]? I'm not even sure you need an official spec. [[User:Comp.arch\|comp.arch]] ([[User talk:Comp.arch\|talk]]) 14:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC) == Latest stable software release template == Line 126 ⟶ 120: @[[User:Xose.vazquez\|Xose.vazquez]]: please stop adding changelog-like material to this article without prior discussion. We are already in the "discuss" phase of [[WP:BRD\|bold, revert, discuss]] after the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Ruby\|History of Ruby AfD]] succeeded (albeit without much participation); I don't want to have to get more people to say content such as a "table of versions" is cruft and unencyclopedic. {{pb}} This is more of a personal note on your conduct, but the way you've been handling this situation has been frustrating. You did not participate in the AfD and it seems like you didn't want to participate in the discussion we were having after my bold [[WP:BLAR\|BLAR]]. Discussion is paramount to Wikipedia's growth as an encyclopedia, and I'm open to reasonable debate about whether or not documenting notable changes to software is Wikipedia's job. [[User:Gracen\|Gracen]] ([[User talk:Gracen\|they]]/[[Special:Contributions/Gracen\|them]]) 15:01, 9 April 2025 (UTC) == "[[:Ruby-gnome2]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion\|Redirects for discussion]] == [[File:Information.svg\|30px]] The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruby-gnome2&redirect=no Ruby-gnome2]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion\|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect\|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{section link\|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 16#Ruby-gnome2}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="color: #006233">[[User:Casablanca Rock\|Casablanca 🪨]]<sup>([[User talk:Casablanca Rock\|T]])</sup></span> 17:11, 16 April 2025 (UTC)