Talk:Ruby (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:18, 22 October 2020

Latest revision as of 12:13, 17 April 2025

(22 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{afd-merged-from|History of Ruby|History of Ruby|28 March 2025}}

{{Talk header|search=yes}}

{{Vital article|topic=Technology|level=5|class=B}}

{{WikiProject Computingbanner shell|class=B |importance=Mid |free-softwarevital=yes |free-software-importance1=High |software=yes }}

{{WikiProject Computer science |importance=High}}

{{auto archiving notice|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=30|dounreplied=yes}}

{{WikiProject Computing |importance=High|free-software=yes |free-software-importance=High |software=yes }}

}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

|target=Talk:Ruby (programming language)/Archive index

Line 27 ⟶ 29:

:* "Your best bet", and the first thing on that site is a link requesting money donations. Looks like link spam, so no. [[User:Fbergo|Fbergo]] ([[User talk:Fbergo|talk]]) 12:10, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

:* You are a good hunter of those... I never noticed it without you pointing out. BTW Wikipedia has an equally unobtrusive Donate link on the sidebar... so what. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/193.245.81.13|193.245.81.13]] ([[User talk:193.245.81.13#top|talk]]) 18:43, 7 December 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== A suggestion for the lede: include the fact that Ruby is free ==

I am fully aware that what goes into the lede is a touchy subject where outsiders are usually wrong. But I went to Wikipedia with the sole purpose of knowing whether Ruby is freely available, something any devotee of open source learning would want to know. I had to go past the lede to learn that Ruby costs nothing. --- Just something to think about. --[[User:Guy vandegrift|guyvan52]] ([[User talk:Guy vandegrift|talk]]) 01:57, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

:OK, I just found the info in the box situated in the lede. I am not qualified to address the question of whether you want to include the word "free" in the first three or four sentences.

::Ruby is a programming language. It would be notable to state if a programming language *isn't* free.

== Nonsense claim in the metaprogramming section ==

"To implement the equivalent in many other languages, the programmer would have to write each method (in_black, in_red, in_green, etc.) separately."

That is absurd: I have worked in over a dozen languages, and I can't think of one of them where one would need to write a method per color! In C, for instance, you would write a print_in_color() function, and pass in an array index (e.g., 'BLUE') for which HTML code you wanted to output. This appears to have been written by someone who has not programmed in any language but Ruby. [[User:GeneCallahan|GeneCallahan]] ([[User talk:GeneCallahan|talk]]) 19:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

:I'm certainly no fan of Ruby (currently struggling with it for work...) but this claim seems legitimate. The result is that the user can write "in_blue(x)", the fact that blue is chosen is part of the identifier for the function. You are saying "blue" can be passed as an argument to the function but that is different. I would suspect lisp can do this pretty easily, and probably most interpreted languages can do something like this but perhaps using non-portable code specific to a given interpreter.[[User:Spitzak|Spitzak]] ([[User talk:Spitzak|talk]]) 21:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

== Version table ==

Line 74 ⟶ 63:

Taken and adapted from [[Template:Version]] This is just intended as an example and may not contain all required information. [[User:Jrmh|Jrmh]] ([[User talk:Jrmh|talk]]) 12:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

:I see we have a [[Ruby (programming_language)#Table of versions]] which [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruby_%28programming_language%29&type=revision&diff=701467310&oldid=701330509 was added] 24 January 2016 by [[User:V975]]. Looks good. -- [[User:Harry Wood|Harry Wood]] ([[User talk:Harry Wood|talk]]) 17:34, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

::Hey, I'm pretty sure that, per [[WP:NOTCHANGELOG]], the table of versions isn't suitable for inclusion in the article. I have since removed it. If I missed something or if the table is vital to the article, feel free to revert. [[User:Moon motif|Moon motif]] ([[User talk:Moon motif|talk]]) 03:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

:::[[WP:NOTCHANGELOG]] is about '''Exhaustive'' logs of software updates". A version history table is not a changelog and not ''exhaustive''.

:::It connects together the release date of an version and its deprecation, which are generally years apart in diverse changelogs and news. That information is relevant for instance when investigating dependencies between different softwares.

:::The table has been appropriately moved to [[History of Ruby]]. [[User:V975|V975]] ([[User talk:V975|talk]]) 23:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

== Unicorns are extinct? ==

Line 87 ⟶ 82:

::::::I'd guess the "weird forking model" is they try to work in a single thread, to avoid any multithreading issues. The popularity seems only a question of usability (they don't ask modification of software or heavy configuration) and performance (benchmarks from Twitter or Deliveroo speaks about requests per seconds). The sources in the Unicorn and Puma article contains some hints about the adoption reasons.

::::::As I'm not a Ruby expert, I'd appreciate if you could review the articles to be sure they're readable. --[[User:Dereckson|Dereckson]] ([[User talk:Dereckson|talk]]) 13:04, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Ruby (programming language)]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=713121697 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:

*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www-4.ibm.com/software/developer/library/ruby.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 02:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

== Relevance of old version sections? ==

I'm not sure what the sections that basically amount to release "cliffnotes" (''especially'' for the versions that are obsolete) add to this page. Is there a reason to include them? The table with version numbers and support status seems like it would suffice. [[User:Rubah|rubah]] ([[User talk:Rubah|talk]]) 05:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

== Keep "differences"? ==

About [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruby_(programming_language)&diff=769305703&oldid=765870761 this edit]. Is it bad to show differences? I didn't look over, saying any of them are true (or not).

Just, if language A (Ruby) has for sure some syntax/semantics and some other language B something else, then ok with [[WP:V]]? I'm not even sure you need an official spec. [[User:Comp.arch|comp.arch]] ([[User talk:Comp.arch|talk]]) 14:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

== Latest stable software release template ==

Line 135 ⟶ 107:

: Because the subject of this article is completely unrelated to [[Ruby character]]. A link for that is in the disambiguation page on the very top of the article. [[User:Fbergo|Fbergo]] ([[User talk:Fbergo|talk]]) 12:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

== "Ruby (programming language" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==

[[File:Information.svg|30px]]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect [[:Ruby (programming language]] and has thus listed it [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|for discussion]]. This discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Ruby (programming language]] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Steel1943|<span style="color: #3F00FF;">'''''Steel1943'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Steel1943|talk]]) 19:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

:Ohhhhhh yerrrp [[Special:Contributions/2600:1702:21E0:4110:6C92:3F59:5093:54E6|2600:1702:21E0:4110:6C92:3F59:5093:54E6]] ([[User talk:2600:1702:21E0:4110:6C92:3F59:5093:54E6|talk]]) 14:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

== New alternative implementation ==

[https://www.artichokeruby.org/ Artichoke] is a Ruby implementation written in [[Rust (programming language)|Rust]]. --<span style="font-family:Fira Sans,sans-serif">[[User:Keyacom|'''''<span style="color:#fa3">Ke</span><span style="color:#4f4">ya</span><span style="color:#66f">com</span>''''']] ([[User talk:Keyacom|💬]] | [[Special:Contributions/Keyacom|🖊]])</span> 21:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

== Changelog cruft ==

@[[User:Xose.vazquez|Xose.vazquez]]: please stop adding changelog-like material to this article without prior discussion. We are already in the "discuss" phase of [[WP:BRD|bold, revert, discuss]] after the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Ruby|History of Ruby AfD]] succeeded (albeit without much participation); I don't want to have to get more people to say content such as a "table of versions" is cruft and unencyclopedic. {{pb}} This is more of a personal note on your conduct, but the way you've been handling this situation has been frustrating. You did not participate in the AfD and it seems like you didn't want to participate in the discussion we were having after my bold [[WP:BLAR|BLAR]]. Discussion is paramount to Wikipedia's growth as an encyclopedia, and I'm open to reasonable debate about whether or not documenting notable changes to software is Wikipedia's job. [[User:Gracen|Gracen]] ([[User talk:Gracen|they]]/[[Special:Contributions/Gracen|them]]) 15:01, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

== "[[:Ruby-gnome2]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==

[[File:Information.svg|30px]]

The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruby-gnome2&redirect=no Ruby-gnome2]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 16#Ruby-gnome2}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="color: #006233">[[User:Casablanca Rock|Casablanca 🪨]]^{([[User talk:Casablanca Rock|T]])}</span> 17:11, 16 April 2025 (UTC)