Content deleted Content added
→Not Moderne: new section |
→Confusing: Reply |
||
Line 65:
:I didn't notice your comment until now, and I hope I've addressed some of the problems in the last few hours. At least it's a start. I really must stop now, sorry. [[User:Arminden|Arminden]] ([[User talk:Arminden|talk]]) 03:27, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
::Another point: what the style was called by contemporaries is probably little more than a curiosity on Wiki, which is mainly a general-interest resource; what the mainstream terminology is ''now'' is, I guess, the most relevant. Anyhow, we cannot have articles w/o clear definitions of the topic at hand, and here things are still far from well. [[User:Arminden|Arminden]] ([[User talk:Arminden|talk]]) 10:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
:::I totally agree with you: there is no need to have articles for obscure terms of the past (Mike Hope puts the number of related terms into dozens, see [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Art_Deco_Architecture/a3maDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA1909]), an no good sources to describe them anyhow. However, redirects for all these terms (most likely, to [[Art Deco]]) might be very useful. The regional varieties quite likely can be adequately covered in sources and thus might end up as articles, similarly to [[Pisan Romanesque]] of the [[Romanesque style]]. [[User:Викидим|Викидим]] ([[User talk:Викидим|talk]]) 19:48, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
== Not Moderne ==
| |||