Generalized complex structure: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Property of a differential manifold that includes complex structures}}
{{No footnotes|date=June 2020}}
In the field of [[mathematics]] known as [[differential geometry]], a '''generalized complex structure''' is a property of a [[differential manifold]] that includes as special cases a [[linear complex structure|complex structure]] and a [[symplectic structure]]. Generalized complex structures were introduced by [[Nigel Hitchin]] in 2002 and further developed by his students [[Marco Gualtieri]] and [[Gil Cavalcanti]].
 
Line 7 ⟶ 9:
===The generalized tangent bundle===
 
Consider an [[Manifold|''N''-manifold]] ''M''. The [[tangent bundle]] of ''M'', which will be denoted '''T''', is the [[vector bundle]] over ''M'' whose fibers consist of all [[tangent vector]]s to ''M''. A [[fiber bundle#Sections|section]] of '''T''' is a [[vector field]] on ''M''. The [[cotangent bundle]] of ''M'', denoted '''T'''<sup>*</sup>, is the vector bundle over ''M'' whose sections are [[differential form|one-forms]] on ''M''.
 
In [[complex geometry]] one considers structures on the tangent bundles of manifolds. In [[symplectic geometry]] one is instead interested in [[Exterior algebra#The exteriorExterior power|exterior powers]] of the cotangent bundle. Generalized geometry unites these two fields by treating sections of the '''generalized tangent bundle''', which is the [[direct sum of vector bundles|direct sum]] <math>\mathbf{T} \oplus \mathbf{T}^*</math> of the tangent and cotangent bundles, which are formal sums of a vector field and a one-form.
 
The fibers are endowed with a natural [[inner product]] with [[Metric signature (topology)|signature]] (''N'',&nbsp;''N''). If ''X'' and ''Y'' are vector fields and ''ξ'' and ''η'' are one-forms then the inner product of ''X+ξ'' and ''Y+η'' is defined as
 
:<math>\langle X+\xi,Y+\eta\rangle=\frac{1}{2}(\xi(Y)+\eta(X)).</math>
Line 29 ⟶ 31:
 
Such subbundle ''L'' satisfies the following properties:
{{ordered list | list-style-type=lower-roman
 
(i)|1= the intersection with its [[complex conjugate]] is the zero section: <math>L\cap\overline{L}=0</math>;
(ii)|2= ''L'' is '''maximal isotropic''', i.e. its complex [[rank (linear algebra)|rank]] equals ''N'' and <math>\langle\ell, \ell' \rangle =0</math> for all <math>\ell,\ell'\in L.</math>}}
 
(ii) ''L'' is '''maximal isotropic''', i.e. its complex [[rank (linear algebra)|rank]] equals ''N'' and <math>\langle\ell, \ell' \rangle =0</math> for all <math>\ell,\ell'\in L.</math>
 
Vice versa, any subbundle ''L'' satisfying (i), (ii) is the <math>\sqrt{-1}</math>-eigenbundle of a unique generalized almost complex structure, so that the properties (i), (ii) can be considered as an alternative definition of generalized almost complex structure.
Line 45 ⟶ 46:
where <math>\mathcal{L}_X</math> is the [[Lie derivative]] along the vector field ''X'', ''d'' is the [[exterior derivative]] and ''i'' is the [[Exterior algebra#The interior product or insertion operator|interior product]].
 
===The definitionDefinition===
A '''generalized complex structure''' is a generalized almost complex structure such that the space of smooth sections of ''L'' is closed under the Courant bracket.
 
Line 55 ⟶ 56:
Given a pair <math>(\mathbf{E}, \varepsilon)</math> one can construct a maximally isotropic subbundle <math>L(\mathbf{E}, \varepsilon)</math> of <math>\mathbf{T} \oplus \mathbf{T}^*</math> as follows. The elements of the subbundle are the [[formal sum]]s <math>X+\xi</math> where the [[vector field]] ''X'' is a section of '''E''' and the one-form ''ξ'' restricted to the [[dual space]] <math>\mathbf{E}^*</math> is equal to the one-form <math>\varepsilon(X).</math>
 
To see that <math>L(\mathbf{E}, \varepsilon)</math> is isotropic, notice that if ''Y'' is a section of '''E''' and <math>\xi</math> restricted to <math>\mathbf{E}^*</math> is <math>\varepsilon(X)</math> then <math>\xi(Y) =\varepsilon(X,Y),</math> as the part of <math>\xi</math> orthogonal to <math>\mathbf{E}^*</math> annihilates ''Y''. TheseforeTherefore if <math>X+\xi</math> and <math>Y+\eta</math> are sections of <math>\mathbf{T} \oplus \mathbf{T}^*</math> then
 
:<math>\langle X+\xi,Y+\eta\rangle=\frac{1}{2}(\xi(Y)+\eta(X))=\frac{1}{2}(\varepsilon(Y,X)+\varepsilon(X,Y))=0</math>
 
and so <math>L(\mathbf{E}, \varepsilon)</math> is isotropic. Furthermore, <math>L(\mathbf{E}, \varepsilon)</math> is maximal because there are <math>\dim(\mathbf{E})</math> (complex) dimensions of choices for <math>\mathbf{E},</math> and <math>\varepsilon</math> is unrestricted on the [[complement (complexity)|complement]] of <math>\mathbf{E}^*,</math> which is of (complex) dimension <math>n-\dim(\mathbf{E}).</math> Thus the total (complex) dimension inis ''n''. Gualtieri has proven that all maximal isotropic subbundles are of the form <math>L(\mathbf{E}, \varepsilon)</math> for some <math>\mathbf{E}</math> and <math>\varepsilon.</math>
 
===Type===
The '''type''' of a maximal isotropic subbundle <math>L(\mathbf{E}, \varepsilon)</math> is the real dimension of the subbundle that annihilates '''E'''. Equivalently it is 2''N'' minus the real dimension of the [[projection (mathematics)|projection]] of <math>L(\mathbf{E}, \varepsilon)</math> onto the tangent bundle '''T'''. In other words, the type of a maximal isotropic subbundle is the codimension of its projection onto the tangent bundle. In the complex case one uses the complex dimension and the type is sometimes referred to as the '''complex type'''. While the type of a subbundle can in principle be any integer between 0 and 2''N'', generalized almost complex structures cannot have a type greater than ''N'' because the sum of the subbundle and its complex conjugate must be all of <math>(\mathbf{T} \oplus \mathbf{T}^*) \otimes \Complex.</math>
 
The type of a maximal isotropic subbundle is [[Invariant (mathematics)|invariant]] under [[diffeomorphisms]] and also under shifts of the [[Kalb-RamondKalb–Ramond field|B-field]], which are [[isometry|isometries]] of <math>\mathbf{T} \oplus \mathbf{T}^*</math> of the form
 
:<math>X+\xi\longrightarrow X+\xi+i_XB</math>
Line 82 ⟶ 83:
The canonical bundle is a one complex dimensional subbundle of the bundle <math>\mathbf{\Lambda}^* \mathbf{T} \otimes \Complex</math> of complex differential forms on ''M''. Recall that the [[gamma matrices]] define an [[isomorphism]] between differential forms and spinors. In particular even and odd forms map to the two chiralities of [[Spinor#Weyl spinors|Weyl spinors]]. Vectors have an action on differential forms given by the interior product. One-forms have an action on forms given by the wedge product. Thus sections of the bundle <math>(\mathbf{T} \oplus \mathbf{T}^*) \otimes \Complex</math> act on differential forms. This action is a [[group representation|representation]] of the action of the [[Clifford algebra]] on spinors.
 
A spinor is said to be a '''pure spinor''' if it is annihilated by half of a set of a set of generators of the Clifford algebra. Spinors are sections of our bundle <math>\mathbf{\Lambda}^* \mathbf{T},</math> and generators of the Clifford algebra are the fibers of our other bundle <math>(\mathbf{T} \oplus \mathbf{T}^*) \otimes \Complex.</math> Therefore, a given pure spinor is annihilated by a half-dimensional subbundle '''E''' of <math>(\mathbf{T} \oplus \mathbf{T}^*) \otimes \Complex.</math> Such subbundles are always isotropic, so to define an almost complex structure one must only impose that the sum of '''E''' and its complex conjugate is all of <math>(\mathbf{T} \oplus \mathbf{T}^*) \otimes \Complex.</math> This is true whenever the [[wedge product]] of the pure spinor and its complex conjugate contains a top-dimensional component. Such pure spinors determine generalized almost complex structures.
 
Given a generalized almost complex structure, one can also determine a pure spinor up to multiplication by an arbitrary [[complex function]]. These choices of pure spinors are defined to be the sections of the canonical bundle.
Line 114 ⟶ 115:
===Local holomorphicity===
 
Near non-regular points, the above [[classification theorem]] does not apply. However, about any point, a generalized complex manifold is, up to diffeomorphism and B-field, a product of a symplectic manifold with a generalized complex manifold which is of complex type at the point, much like Weinstein's theorem for the local structure of [[Poisson manifold]]s. The remaining question of the local structure is: what does a generalized complex structure look like near a point of complex type? In fact, it will be induced by a holomorphic [[Poisson manifold|Poisson structure]].
 
==Examples==
Line 143 ⟶ 144:
Some of the almost structures in generalized complex geometry may be rephrased in the language of [[G-structure]]s. The word "almost" is removed if the structure is integrable.
 
The bundle <math>(\mathbf{T} \oplus \mathbf{T}^*) \otimes \Complex</math> with the above inner product is an {{math|O(2''n'',&nbsp; 2''n'')}} structure. A generalized almost complex structure is a reduction of this structure to a {{math|U(''n'',&nbsp; ''n'')}} structure. Therefore, the space of generalized complex structures is the coset
 
:<math>\frac{O(2n,2n)}{U(n,n)}.</math>
Line 157 ⟶ 158:
==References==
 
*[[{{cite journal |authorlink=Nigel Hitchin |last=Hitchin, |first=Nigel]] [https://dx.|doi.org/=10.1093/qmath/hag025 |title=Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds], |journal=[[Quarterly Journal of Mathematics]] '''|volume=54''' (|year=2003), no. |issue=3, |pages=281&ndash;308. }}
*{{cite thesis |last=Gualtieri, |first=Marco, [https://|arxiv.org/abs/=math.DG/0401221 |title=Generalized complex geometry], |type=PhD Thesis (|date=2004). }}
*{{cite journal |last=Gualtieri, |first=Marco, [https://dx.|doi.org/=10.4007/annals.2011.174.1.3 |title=Generalized complex geometry], |journal=[[Annals of Mathematics]] |series=(2) '''|volume=174''' (|year=2011), no. |issue=1, |pages=75&ndash;123 |doi-access=free |arxiv=0911.0993 }}
*{{cite journal |last=Graña, |first=Mariana, [https://|arxiv.org/abs/abs/=hep-th/0509003 |title=Flux compactifications in string theory: a comprehensive review], |journal=Phys. Rep. |volume=423 (|year=2006) 91-158|issue=3 |pages=91–158 |doi=10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.008 |s2cid=119508517 }}
*[[{{cite journal |authorlink=Robbert Dijkgraaf]], [[|first1=Robbert |last1=Dijkgraaf |authorlink2=Sergei Gukov]], |first2=Sergei |last2=Gukov |first3=Andrew |last3=Neitzke, and|authorlink4=Cumrun [[Vafa |first4=Cumrun |last4=Vafa]], [http://projecteuclid-org.ezproxy.neu.edu/euclid.atmp/1144070454 |title=Topological M-theory as unification of form theories of gravity], |journal=[[Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics]] '''|volume=9''' (|year=2005), no. |issue=4, |pages=603&ndash;665 |doi=10.4310/ATMP.2005.v9.n4.a5 |doi-access=free |arxiv=hep-th/0411073 }}
 
{{String theory topics |state=collapsed}}