Microsoft Java Virtual Machine: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
do we really need to cover ms-openjdk here
m Bot: http → https
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 46:
 
==External links==
*[https://java.visualstudio.com/ Modern support of Java at Microsoft]
*{{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140108120009/http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/interoperability/java/default.aspx |date=January 8, 2014 |title=Microsoft Java Virtual Machine Support }}
*{{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/java/faq.mspx |date=* |title=Microsoft Java transition FAQ }}
*{{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121111054630/http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/press/1998/dec98/javavmpr.aspx |date=November 11, 2012 |title=Award-Winning Virtual Machine Continues to Provide Fastest, Most Integrated Java Language Support }}. Microsoft Press release, Dec. 7, 1998
*Darryl K. Taft - [httphttps://www.eweek.com/mobile/microsoft-to-junk-flagship-products-cites-java-settlement Microsoft to Junk Flagship Products, Cites Java Settlement]. December 5, 2003. [[eWeek]]
*Joe Wilcox and Stephen Shankland - [https://www.cnet.com/news/microsofts-java-decision-a-mixed-bag/ Microsoft's Java decision a mixed bag]. [[CNET]], March 18, 2002
*[http://java-virtual-machine.net/download.html Microsoft Virtual Machine Download Links]
Line 59 ⟶ 58:
 
[[Category:Discontinued Java virtual machines]]
[[Category:Discontinued Microsoft software|Java Virtual Machine]]
[[Category:Microsoft litigation]]