Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Header: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Dreamy Jazz (talk | contribs) add |
Closetside (talk | contribs) Redirect vexatious to vexbysterang; the term for bad commenters |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="plainlinks" style="text-align: center
<span style="font-size: 125%;">'''[{{fullurl:Special:NewSection/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement|preload=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/preload&editintro=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/editintro}} Click here to add a new enforcement request]'''</span><br/>'''For appeals: [[Special:NewSection/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement|create a new section]] and use the template {{tl|Arbitration enforcement appeal}}'''<br/> See also: [[Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log|Logged AE sanctions]] </div>
<div class="plainlinks" style="margin: 1px;">
Line 5 ⟶ 6:
| type = delete
| image =
| style =
| text = <span style="font-size: 1.3em; text-decoration: underline;">'''Important information'''</span>{{shortcut|WP:AE|WP:ARE}}
Please use this page
*request administrative action against
*request contentious topic restrictions against a [[Wikipedia:AC/CT#Awareness of contentious topics|previously alerted]]
*request [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics#Page_restrictions|page restrictions]] (e.g. revert restrictions) on pages that are being disrupted in topic areas designated as contentious topics, or
*[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Procedures#Standard_provision:_appeals_and_modifications|appeal arbitration enforcement actions]] (including contentious topic restrictions) to uninvolved administrators.
For all other problems, including content disagreements or the enforcement of community-imposed sanctions, please use the other fora described in the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution process]]. To appeal Arbitration Committee decisions, please use [[WP:ARCA|the clarification and amendment noticeboard]].
'''Only [[WP:autoconfirmed|autoconfirmed]] users may file enforcement requests here
[[File:Symbol information vote.svg|frameless|15px|link=|alt=]] {{emu|'''The scope of a discussion is limited to the conduct of two parties''': the filer and the user being reported.}} If additional editors are to be reported, separate AE reports must be opened for each. AE admins may waive this rule if the particular issue warrants doing so.
To make an enforcement request, click on the link above this box and supply all required information. Incomplete requests may be ignored. Requests reporting diffs older than one week may be declined as stale. To appeal a contentious topic restriction or other enforcement decision, please create a new section and use the template {{tl|Arbitration enforcement appeal}}.
{{cot|
The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics|procedures]] relating to modifications of contentious topic restrictions state the following:<!-- Last updated 18 Jan 2023 -->
{{ivmbox|1=All contentious topic restrictions (and [[#Warnings|logged warnings]]) may be appealed. Only the restricted editor may appeal an editor restriction. Any editor may appeal a page restriction.
The appeal process has three possible stages. An editor appealing a restriction may:
Line 56 ⟶ 59:
# the action was inconsistent with the contentious topics procedure or applicable policy (i.e. the action was out of process),
# the action represents an unreasonable exercise of administrative enforcement discretion, or
# compelling circumstances warrant the full Committee's action.}}
{{notelist}}
{{cob}}
{{cot|Appeals and administrator modifications of other arbcom sanctions}}
{{ivmbox|1=
The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures|procedures]] relating to modifications and appeals state:<!-- Last updated 18 Jan 2023 -->
Line 86 ⟶ 91:
# <li value="2"> While asking the enforcing administrator and seeking reviews at AN or AE are not mandatory prior to seeking a decision from the committee, once the committee has reviewed a request, further substantive review at any forum is barred. The sole exception is editors under an active sanction who may still request an easing or removal of the sanction on the grounds that said sanction is no longer needed, but such requests may only be made once every six months, or whatever longer period the committee may specify.
# These provisions apply only to contentious topic restrictions placed by administrators and to blocks placed by administrators to enforce arbitration case decisions. They do not apply to sanctions directly authorized by the committee, and enacted either by arbitrators or by arbitration clerks, or to special functionary blocks of whatever nature.
# All actions designated as arbitration enforcement actions, including those alleged to be out of process or against existing policy, must first be appealed following arbitration enforcement procedures to establish if such enforcement is inappropriate before the action may be reversed or formally discussed at another venue.}}
{{cob}}
{{cot|Information for administrators processing requests}}
Thank you for participating in this area. AE works best if there are a variety of admins bringing their expertise to each case. There is no expectation to comment on every case, and the Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) thanks all admins for whatever time they can give.
A couple of reminders:
:* The enforcement measures in arbitration cases should be construed liberally in order to protect Wikipedia and keep it running efficiently. Not all enforcement requests will show behavior restricted by ArbCom. It may, however, violate other Wikipedia policies and guidelines which you may use administrative discretion to deal with.▼
:* More than one side in a dispute may have Arbitration Committee conduct rulings applicable to them.▼
* Before commenting, please familiarise yourself with the referenced ArbCom case. Please also read all the evidence (including diffs) presented in the AE request.
:* Once an issue is resolved, enclose it between {{tl|hat}} and {{tl|hab}} tags, after which a bot should archive it in 7 days.▼
:* You can use the templates {{tl|uw-aeblock}} (for blocks) or {{tl|AE sanction}} (for other contentious topic restrictions) to give notice of sanctions on user talk pages.▼
▲
▲:* When a request widens to include editors beyond the initial request, these editors must be notified and the notifications recorded in the same way as for the initial editor against whom sanctions were requested. Where some part of the outcome is clear, a partial close may be implemented and noted under ''Result concerning X''.
▲
Closing a thread:
▲
* Please consider [[WP:ARCA|referring the case to ARCA]] if the outcome is a recommendation to do so or the issue regards administrator conduct.
▲
* Please log sanctions in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log|Arbitration enforcement log]].
Thanks again for helping. If you have any questions, please post on the [[WT:AE|talk page]].
{{cob}}
Line 102 ⟶ 117:
[[Category:Wikipedia arbitration templates|Requests/Enforcement/Header]]
</noinclude>
<includeonly>{{namespace detect
|wikipedia = [[Category:Wikipedia arbitration]]
[[Category:Wikipedia requests]]
}}</includeonly>
|