Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Header: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Separate CT and non-CT appeals and modifications procedures |
Closetside (talk | contribs) Redirect vexatious to vexbysterang; the term for bad commenters |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="plainlinks" style="text-align: center
<span style="font-size: 125%;">'''[{{fullurl:Special:NewSection/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement|preload=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/preload&editintro=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/editintro}} Click here to add a new enforcement request]'''</span><br/>'''For appeals: [[Special:NewSection/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement|create a new section]] and use the template {{tl|Arbitration enforcement appeal}}'''<br/> See also: [[Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log|Logged AE sanctions]] </div>
<div class="plainlinks" style="margin: 1px;">
Line 5 ⟶ 6:
| type = delete
| image =
| style =
| text = <span style="font-size: 1.3em; text-decoration: underline;">'''Important information'''</span>{{shortcut|WP:AE|WP:ARE}}
Please use this page
*request administrative action against
*request contentious topic restrictions against a [[Wikipedia:AC/CT#Awareness of contentious topics|previously alerted]]
*request [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics#Page_restrictions|page restrictions]] (e.g. revert restrictions) on pages that are being disrupted in topic areas designated as contentious topics, or
*[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Procedures#Standard_provision:_appeals_and_modifications|appeal arbitration enforcement actions]] (including contentious topic restrictions) to uninvolved administrators.
For all other problems, including content disagreements or the enforcement of community-imposed sanctions, please use the other fora described in the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution process]]. To appeal Arbitration Committee decisions, please use [[WP:ARCA|the clarification and amendment noticeboard]].
'''Only [[WP:autoconfirmed|autoconfirmed]] users may file enforcement requests here
[[File:Symbol information vote.svg|frameless|15px|link=|alt=]] {{emu|'''The scope of a discussion is limited to the conduct of two parties''': the filer and the user being reported.}} If additional editors are to be reported, separate AE reports must be opened for each. AE admins may waive this rule if the particular issue warrants doing so.
To make an enforcement request, click on the link above this box and supply all required information. Incomplete requests may be ignored. Requests reporting diffs older than one week may be declined as stale. To appeal a contentious topic restriction or other enforcement decision, please create a new section and use the template {{tl|Arbitration enforcement appeal}}.
{{cot|
The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics|procedures]] relating to modifications of contentious topic restrictions state the following:<!-- Last updated 18 Jan 2023 -->
Line 58 ⟶ 61:
# compelling circumstances warrant the full Committee's action.}}
{{notelist}}
The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures|procedures]] relating to modifications and appeals state:<!-- Last updated 18 Jan 2023 -->▼
{{cob}}
{{cot|Appeals and administrator modifications of
{{ivmbox|1=
▲The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures|procedures]] relating to modifications and appeals state:<!-- Last updated 18 Jan 2023 -->
;Appeals by sanctioned editors
Line 92 ⟶ 95:
{{cot|Information for administrators processing requests}}
Thank you for participating in this area. AE works best if there are a variety of admins bringing their expertise to each case. There is no expectation to comment on every case, and the Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) thanks all admins for whatever time they can give.
A couple of reminders:
:* The enforcement measures in arbitration cases should be construed liberally in order to protect Wikipedia and keep it running efficiently. Not all enforcement requests will show behavior restricted by ArbCom. It may, however, violate other Wikipedia policies and guidelines which you may use administrative discretion to deal with.▼
:* More than one side in a dispute may have Arbitration Committee conduct rulings applicable to them.▼
* Before commenting, please familiarise yourself with the referenced ArbCom case. Please also read all the evidence (including diffs) presented in the AE request.
:* Once an issue is resolved, enclose it between {{tl|hat}} and {{tl|hab}} tags, after which a bot should archive it in 7 days.▼
:* You can use the templates {{tl|uw-aeblock}} (for blocks) or {{tl|AE sanction}} (for other contentious topic restrictions) to give notice of sanctions on user talk pages.▼
▲
▲:* When a request widens to include editors beyond the initial request, these editors must be notified and the notifications recorded in the same way as for the initial editor against whom sanctions were requested. Where some part of the outcome is clear, a partial close may be implemented and noted under ''Result concerning X''.
▲
Closing a thread:
▲
* Please consider [[WP:ARCA|referring the case to ARCA]] if the outcome is a recommendation to do so or the issue regards administrator conduct.
▲
* Please log sanctions in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log|Arbitration enforcement log]].
Thanks again for helping. If you have any questions, please post on the [[WT:AE|talk page]].
{{cob}}
Line 104 ⟶ 117:
[[Category:Wikipedia arbitration templates|Requests/Enforcement/Header]]
</noinclude>
<includeonly>{{namespace detect
|wikipedia = [[Category:Wikipedia arbitration]]
[[Category:Wikipedia requests]]
}}</includeonly>
|