Content deleted Content added
modified my comment |
JoNeedsSleep (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 92:
:::::Redirects, technically, are pages that only contain a link to another article. We could for example modify the redirect page "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interpretability_(machine_learning)&redirect=no Interpretability (machine learning)]" to point to the new "Mechanistic interpretability" article instead of "Explainable artificial intelligence".
:::::But maybe you meant when you said redirect is "[[MOS:LINK|internal link]]". I guess the only thing that needs to be done in this article on xAI is to add either a [[Template:main article|main article template]] in the "[[Explainable artificial intelligence#Interpretability|Interpretability]]" subsection to the new article, or a simple internal link. [[User:Alenoach|Alenoach]] ([[User talk:Alenoach|talk]]) 19:58, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
::::::Hi Alenoach, thanks for the suggestion - that is my plan. I wrote the article here [[Talk:Mechanistic Interpretability]] but the url redirects to this page still. Do you have any advice for redirecting the mechanistic interpretability url to the right page? Thanks! [[User:JoNeedsSleep|JoNeedsSleep]] ([[User talk:JoNeedsSleep|talk]]) 03:42, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
:::::::Actually, I moved the redirect page. Would appreciate your feedback on [[Mechanistic Interpretability]]. On the point of redirecting Interpretability to Mech Interp, I think Mech Interp is historically a lot narrower than interpretability and would propose still redirecting it to xai, except with an expanded section. [[User:JoNeedsSleep|JoNeedsSleep]] ([[User talk:JoNeedsSleep|talk]]) 03:47, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
::::::::The article is well-written. I made [[Special:Diff/1290020387|some]] modifications. It would benefit though from having more sources from reliable news outlets or peer-reviewed journals, Wikipedia is pretty strict on which sources are [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|considered reliable]].
::::::::For the redirect, are you sure you don't want the redirect to point to the article on mechanistic interpretability? I know mechanistic interpretability is more narrow than interpretability, but I suppose that's what people are interested in most of the time when they search for "Interpretability". [[User:Alenoach|Alenoach]] ([[User talk:Alenoach|talk]]) 09:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::Thanks for the feedback, really appreciate it. I am not opposed to redirecting interp to mech interp. XAI is definitely not what people are looking for when they search interp and that interp section is way too brief, though my main concern is that I described mech interp more in its precise sense, and there’s non-“mechanistic” interpretability especially in various disconnected parts of academia. I do plan to incorporate more history of mech interp in academia in my next revision. Would you recommend I expand the scope of this article in my next revisiob? [[User:JoNeedsSleep|JoNeedsSleep]] ([[User talk:JoNeedsSleep|talk]]) 15:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::Not necessary to expand the scope I would say, unless you think it would make the article better. Interpretability in general has a more fuzzy scope, and the overlap with explainability might confuse readers. I know redirecting from "Interpretability (machine learning)" to "Mechanistic interpretability" is not an exact match, but I suppose the link to "Mechanistic interpretability" would still be more useful, so I have a slight preference for redirecting to that. [[User:Alenoach|Alenoach]] ([[User talk:Alenoach|talk]]) 15:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::That makes sense, I'm with you on that judgment. [[User:JoNeedsSleep|JoNeedsSleep]] ([[User talk:JoNeedsSleep|talk]]) 16:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
| |||