Content deleted Content added
JoNeedsSleep (talk | contribs) |
JoNeedsSleep (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 97:
::::::::For the redirect, are you sure you don't want the redirect to point to the article on mechanistic interpretability? I know mechanistic interpretability is more narrow than interpretability, but I suppose that's what people are interested in most of the time when they search for "Interpretability". [[User:Alenoach|Alenoach]] ([[User talk:Alenoach|talk]]) 09:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::Thanks for the feedback, really appreciate it. I am not opposed to redirecting interp to mech interp. XAI is definitely not what people are looking for when they search interp and that interp section is way too brief, though my main concern is that I described mech interp more in its precise sense, and there’s non-“mechanistic” interpretability especially in various disconnected parts of academia. I do plan to incorporate more history of mech interp in academia in my next revision. Would you recommend I expand the scope of this article in my next revisiob? [[User:JoNeedsSleep|JoNeedsSleep]] ([[User talk:JoNeedsSleep|talk]]) 15:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::Not necessary to expand the scope I would say, unless you think it would make the article better. Interpretability in general has a more fuzzy scope, and the overlap with explainability might confuse readers. I know redirecting from "Interpretability (machine learning)" to "Mechanistic interpretability" is not an exact match, but I suppose the link to "Mechanistic interpretability" would still be more useful, so I have a slight preference for redirecting to that. [[User:Alenoach|Alenoach]] ([[User talk:Alenoach|talk]]) 15:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::That makes sense, I'm with you on that judgment. [[User:JoNeedsSleep|JoNeedsSleep]] ([[User talk:JoNeedsSleep|talk]]) 16:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
| |||