Content deleted Content added
→Weakening: again with the pidgeons... |
|||
(20 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Jewish body of laws}}
{{Kehuna and Kohanim}}
{{More citations needed|date=May 2025}}
The '''Priestly Code''' (in Hebrew '''''Torat Kohanim''''', תורת כהנים) is the name given, by academia,<ref>The book of Leviticus: composition and reception - Page 55 Rolf Rendtorff, Robert A. Kugler, Sarah Smith Bartel - 2003 "Research agrees that its relation to the "Priestly Code" is the central, literary historical problem of Leviticus. However, there are major differences when it comes to solving this problem."</ref> to the body of laws expressed in the [[Torah]] which do not form part of the [[Holiness Code]], the [[Covenant Code]], the [[Ritual Decalogue]], or the [[Ethical Decalogue]]. The Priestly Code constitutes the majority of [[Leviticus]], as well as some of the laws expressed in [[Book of Numbers|Numbers]]. The code forms a large portion, approximately one third, of the commandments of the Torah, and thus is a major source of [[Jewish
It is termed the Priestly
==Constituent parts==
Although
*Law of [[circumcision]] ([[Book of Genesis|Genesis]] 17)
*Laws concerning consumption of the [[Passover]] meal ([[Book of Exodus|Exodus]] 12:43-49)
Line 14 ⟶ 16:
*List of clean and unclean animals (Leviticus 11)
*Laws of purification and atonement (Leviticus 12, Leviticus 13, and Leviticus 15)
*Laws
**The prohibition against consuming the naturally dead (Leviticus 17:15-16)
**The order to make trespass offerings after sexual involvement with an engaged slavewoman (Leviticus 19:21-22)
Line 22 ⟶ 24:
**The order for a trumpet sounding on Yom Kippur (Leviticus 25:9b)
**Rules concerning redeeming property (Leviticus 25:23 and 25:26-34)
**Order to only keep
**Rules concerning redeeming people (Leviticus 25:48-52, and 25:54)
*Law concerning the commutation of vows (Leviticus 27)
*Miscellaneous laws concerning [[leper]]s, and dedicated things (Numbers 5:1-10)
*Law concerning [[Sotah|women suspected of
*Law of the "Little Passover" (Numbers 9:9-14)
*Laws concerning the duties and revenue of priests and Levites (Numbers 18)
Line 45 ⟶ 47:
*Rule of [[tzitzit|fringes]] (Leviticus 15:37-41)
*Ritual of [[Yom Kippur]] (Leviticus 16:3-34, 25:9b)
*Rituals
**The order to keep the [[Shabbat|sabbath]], [[passover]], and [[passover|feast of unleavened bread
]] (Leviticus 23:1-10a)
Line 61 ⟶ 63:
The majority of the Priestly Code is presented in the Torah as the Law which is given to Moses directly by God at [[Mount Sinai]]. Unlike the Decalogues, however, [[Yahweh]] speaks the
laws to Moses while descended, in a cloud, upon the [[Tabernacle]] which the Israelites have constructed. The remainder is present as scattered laws either given by Moses directly, or by being given in a similar manner to the majority, via the tabernacle, but after the Israelites have moved elsewhere, taking the tabernacle with them. The implication, therefore, is that the tabernacle is the place where God
==Composition==
{{main|
It is evident that rules of priestly procedure must have accompanied the institution of the priesthood, and in the earliest of times, before writing was invented, these rules probably were transmitted orally. When writing was first employed in connection with them, it is likely that only some general directions, or some details deemed most important, were committed to writing. As time passed on the importance given to written law would lead the priesthood to commit more and more of the details to writing. Critical scholars assert that in addition to this, over time, variations of detail would develop, authority for which must be committed to writing, so that actual practise would become justified by law. One would, therefore, suppose beforehand that such a code would exhibit evidence of gradual growth.
Line 101 ⟶ 103:
Leviticus 4 is of this vein, extending the laws of the "sin-offering" to specify the penalty for each level of sin. Additionally, the ritual for the offering itself is more elaborate than that described elsewhere, for example at Leviticus 9:8-11, and utilizes a bullock, rather than the goat that is required according to Leviticus 9:15, 16:8, and Numbers 15:24. Critical scholars, therefore, regard this chapter as being a much later addition to the ''sin-offering'' laws.
Different stages of precision are also thought evident in Numbers 8. Numbers 8:15b-26 repeats the rules of Numbers 8:6-15a, but also connects the ownership of the firstborn with [[the Exodus]] from Egypt, as well as adding rules concerning a minimum age and a [[retirement]] age. Standard textual criticism, as well as the repetition, is thought to indicate that the second portion is by a different writer, creating an explanation that
Such increasing of precision is not only present in direct modification of the law, and there are examples of instances where narrative frameworks present modifications of the law, but openly admitting that they are extra rules, not present when the laws were originally given out. For example, the law of the ''little passover'' in Numbers 9:9-14 adds rules concerning how people who have become unclean can manage to carry out the passover rules of Exodus 12:1-20. In a similar manner, the [[case law]] example, involving the daughters of Zelophehad, at Numbers 27:1-11, is returned to at Numbers 36, conveniently providing a framework to express a quite different law.
Line 109 ⟶ 111:
There are also examples of clauses which appear to water down preceding laws. Leviticus 14:21-32 provides for the substitution of two turtledoves (or pigeons) for a lamb, reducing the cost to the provider of the sacrifice. While this is presented as being a response for poor sinners, critical scholarship interprets the section as indicating that, historically, an earlier sacrificial ''offering'', of a lamb, was increasingly being replaced, over time, by a pair of turtledoves.
Modification of
==Provenance==
Line 122 ⟶ 124:
ritual of atonement, and yet others, such as Leviticus 13:47-59 do not mention atonement at all.
Another distinct style is that of [[case law]], in which the basic outline of a brief problem is described, such as Leviticus 15:32-41, discussing how to deal with a man who has collected sticks on the sabbath, and whether that constitutes a violation of the rule not to commit work on that day, and then the solution is explained by Moses, often after he has consulted with God. This is present on multiple occasions, such as concerning the daughters of [[Zelophehad]], as well when the issue of the ''little passover'' was raised at Numbers 9:1-14. While many of these instances have, according to textual criticism, the resemblance of a single source, there are
Much of the remainder of the Priestly Code is viewed as more disparate. The [[benediction]] at Leviticus 6:22-27 is viewed as a late addition to that chapter, including for linguistic reasons concerning the manner of wording used within it as dating from an historically later period. Even later still is, according to critical scholarship, Leviticus 27, regarding vows, which mentions a [[Cattle tithe|tithe
==References==
Line 136 ⟶ 138:
[[Category:Priesthood (Judaism)]]
[[Category:Book of Leviticus]]
[[Category:Mitzvoth]]
|