Talk:Finite element method: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:54, 31 January 2023

Latest revision as of 00:38, 20 May 2025

(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Talk Header}}

{{VitalWikiProject articlebanner shell|class=C|levelvital=5yes|topic1=Mathematics}}

{{WikiProject Banner ShellMathematics|1importance=mid}}

{{MathsWikiProject rating|frequentlyviewed=yes|class=CPhysics|importance=mid|field=applied mathematics}}

{{WikiProject Physics|class=C|importance=mid}}

}}

Line 535 ⟶ 534:

Franz Roters is not the progenitor of CPFEM it existed long before he even had a PhD. He is, though, involved in the on-going development of DAMASK which is a crystal plasticity software package. [[Special:Contributions/2601:940:C081:4980:E3F1:FD00:EBB0:B69E|2601:940:C081:4980:E3F1:FD00:EBB0:B69E]] ([[User talk:2601:940:C081:4980:E3F1:FD00:EBB0:B69E|talk]]) 00:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

== No mention of element types? ==

The article currently doesn't mention (at least explicitly) a lot of element types (e.g. CST, LST, Isoparametric, etc)....should it? Or is the intent to not get quite that deep? (I.e. just a general overview of the method.)[[User:Rja13ww33|Rja13ww33]] ([[User talk:Rja13ww33|talk]]) 16:45, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

:By the way, any suggestion for a source for element pics (that wouldn't be a copyright violation) would be welcome. Everything I can think of would create copyright problems. [[User:Rja13ww33|Rja13ww33]] ([[User talk:Rja13ww33|talk]]) 00:38, 20 May 2025 (UTC)