Content deleted Content added
| (9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Talk Header}}
{{WikiProject
{{
{{WikiProject Physics
}}
Line 131 ⟶ 130:
::Five years later, and frankly, this article is still terrible. Guido's remark that one can only recognize the method at all from this article with great difficulty is spot-on. There are plenty of very intelligent people discussing the most banal of things on this discussion page - the "underlooked role" of one person or another in its history, etc. - can't we improve this article so that it is worth something? The article is terrible, folks, absolutely terrible. If making little changes is not going to improve the situation, then please, someone be bold and rewrite the whole thing. -[[Special:Contributions/24.13.162.248|24.13.162.248]] ([[User talk:24.13.162.248|talk]]) 00:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
:::What are you waiting for? Go ahead, make improvements if you have the ability (but please spare us with your opinion on how incapable all other editors are)! [[User:Tomeasy|<span style="color:#0000f1;font-family:Papyrus;cursor:help">'''''T<
== Not much use to a non-mathematician ==
Line 531 ⟶ 530:
:This is essentially Problem 1.1 in "Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method" by Claes Johnson. (1) implies that u"-f is orthogonal to any v. Pick any point x inside the interval and restrict v to have support in delta-neighborhood of x. By the mean value theorem for integrals, there is a point c in that delta-neighborhood such that (u"-f)v is zero at c, i.e. such that (u"-f)(c)=0. Now by continuity (u"-f)(x)=0 which implies P1 since x was arbitrary. [[User:Tzanio|Tzanio]] ([[User talk:Tzanio|talk]]) 03:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
== Crystal plasticity FEM ==
Franz Roters is not the progenitor of CPFEM it existed long before he even had a PhD. He is, though, involved in the on-going development of DAMASK which is a crystal plasticity software package. [[Special:Contributions/2601:940:C081:4980:E3F1:FD00:EBB0:B69E|2601:940:C081:4980:E3F1:FD00:EBB0:B69E]] ([[User talk:2601:940:C081:4980:E3F1:FD00:EBB0:B69E|talk]]) 00:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
== No mention of element types? ==
The article currently doesn't mention (at least explicitly) a lot of element types (e.g. CST, LST, Isoparametric, etc)....should it? Or is the intent to not get quite that deep? (I.e. just a general overview of the method.)[[User:Rja13ww33|Rja13ww33]] ([[User talk:Rja13ww33|talk]]) 16:45, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
:By the way, any suggestion for a source for element pics (that wouldn't be a copyright violation) would be welcome. Everything I can think of would create copyright problems. [[User:Rja13ww33|Rja13ww33]] ([[User talk:Rja13ww33|talk]]) 00:38, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
| |||