Cumulative density function: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
no one got around to closing the RfC and it expired, but I think the outcome was pretty clear
Tag: New redirect
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1:
*#redirect [[cumulativeCumulative distribution function]].
'''''Cumulative density function''''' is a self-contradictory phrase resulting from confusion between:
 
* [[probability density function]], and
* [[cumulative distribution function]].
 
The two words ''cumulative'' and ''density'' contradict each other. The value of a density function in an interval about a point depends only on probabities of sets in arbitrarily small neighborhoods of that point, so it is not cumulative.
 
That is to say, if values are taken from a population of values described by the density function, and plotted as points on a linear axis, the density function reflects the density with which the plotted points will accumulate. The probability of finding a point between {{math|''x''<sub>1</sub>}} and {{math|''x''<sub>2</sub>}} is the integral of the probability density function over this range.
 
This is related to the [[probability mass function]] which is the equivalent for variables that assign positive probability to individual points. The probability mass function is therefore sometimes referred to as the ''discrete density function''.
 
In both cases, the cumulative distribution function is the integral (or, in the discrete case, the sum) for all values less than or equal to the current value of {{math|''x''}}, and so shows the accumulated probability so far. This is the sense in which it is ''cumulative''. Thus the probability density function of the [[normal distribution]] is a bell-curve, while the corresponding cumulative distribution function is a strictly increasing function approaching 0 at −∞ and approaching 1 at&nbsp;+∞.
 
{{disambig}}