Reliability theory of aging and longevity: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:33, 11 April 2017

Latest revision as of 20:55, 23 May 2025

(32 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{short description|Biophysics theory}}

{{merge|Leonid Gavrilov|discuss=Talk:Leonid Gavrilov#Proposed merge with Reliability theory of aging and longevity|date=September 2015}}

{{notability|date=September 2015}}

{{use dmy dates|date=September 2015}}

{{use list-defined references|date=September 2015}}

The '''reliability theory of aging''' is an attempt to apply the principles of [[reliability theory]] to create a [[mathematical model]] of [[senescence]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Gavrilov |first1=Leonid A. |last2=Gavrilova |first2=Natalia S. |title=Chapter 1 - Reliability Theory of Aging and Longevity |journal=Handbook of the Biology of Aging (Sixth Edition) |series=Handbooks of Aging |date=1 January 2005 |pages=3–42 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780120883875500042 |publisher=Academic Press|doi=10.1016/B978-012088387-5/50004-2 |isbn=978-0-12-088387-5 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> The theory was published in Russian by Leonid A. Gavrilov and Natalia S. Gavrilova as ''Biologiia prodolzhitelʹnosti zhizni'' in 1986, and in English translation as ''The Biology of Life Span: A Quantitative Approach'' in 1991.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Gavrilov |first1=Leonid A. |last2=Gavrilova |first2= Natalia S. |editor1-last=Skulachev |editor1-first=V.P. |editor1-link=Vladimir P. Skulachev |title=Биология продолжительности жизни: Количественные аспекты |year=1986 |trans-title=Biology of Life Span: A Quantitative Approach |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zMY5AAAAIAAJ |language=ru |edition=1st |___location=Moscow |publisher=[[Nauka (publisher)|Nauka]] |publication-date=1986 |pages=167}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Gavrilov |first1=Leonid A. |last2=Gavrilova |first2= Natalia S. |editor1-last=Skulachev |editor1-first=V.P. |editor1-link=Vladimir P. Skulachev |title=Биология продолжительности жизни: Количественные аспекты |year=1991 |trans-title=Biology of Life Span: A Quantitative Approach |url=https://textarchive.ru/c-1387064-pall.html |language=ru |edition=2nd |___location=Moscow |publisher=[[Nauka (publisher)|Nauka]] |publication-date=1991 |pages=280 |isbn=5-02-013445-7}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Gavrilov |first1=Leonid A. |last2=Gavrilova |first2= Natalia S. |editor1-last=Skulachev |editor1-first=V.P. |editor1-link=Vladimir P. Skulachev |title=Biology of Life Span: A Quantitative Approach |date=7 March 1991 |language=en |edition=1st |___location=New York |publisher=Chur |publication-date=1991 |pages=385 |isbn=978-3718649839}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|author=A.J.S. Rayl |date=2002-05-13 |title=Aging, in Theory: A Personal Pursuit. Do body system redundancies hold the key? |url=http://longevity-science.org/TheScientist.pdf |journal=[[The Scientist (magazine)|The Scientist]] |volume=16 |issue=10 |pages=20 |doi= |pmc= |pmid=}}</ref>

The '''reliability theory of aging''' is an attempt to apply the principles of [[reliability theory]] to create a [[mathematical model]] of [[aging]]. The theory was published in Russian by [[Leonid A. Gavrilov]] and Natalia S. Gavrilova as ''Biologiia prodolzhitelʹnosti zhizni'' in 1986, and in English translation as ''The Biology of Life Span: A Quantitative Approach'' in 1991.{{r|gav|rayl}}

One of the models suggested in the book is based on an analogy with the reliability theory. The underlying [[hypothesis]] is based on the previously suggested premise that humans are born in a highly defective state. This is then made worse by environmental and mutational damage; exceptionally high [[Redundancy (engineering)|redundancy]] due to the extremely high number of low-reliable components (e.g.., [[cell (biology)|cell]]s) allows the organism to survive for a while.<ref>{{rcite web|url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/engineering-and-aging-the-best-is-yet-to-be |title=Engineering and Aging: The Best Is Yet to Be |work=[[IEEE Spectrum]] |date=2004-09-01}}</ref><ref name=gg2001/>

The theory suggests an explanation of two aging phenomena for higher organisms: the [[Gompertz law]] of exponential increase in mortality rates with age and the "late-life mortality plateau" (mortality deceleration compared to the Gompertz law at higher ages).<ref name=gg2001>Gavrilov, Gavrilova (2001).</ref>

The book criticized a number of hypotheses known at the time, discussed drawbacks of the hypotheses put forth by the authors themselves, and concluded that regardless the suggested mathematical models, the underlying biological mechanisms remain unknown.<ref>"Conclusion" section of the book</ref>

The book criticizes a number of hypotheses known at the time, discusses drawbacks of the hypotheses put forth by the authors themselves, and concludes that regardless of the suggested mathematical models, the underlying biological mechanisms remain unknown.<ref>"Conclusion" section of the book</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Gavrilov |first1=Leonid A. |last2=Gavrilova |first2=Natalia S. |date=2001-12-21 |title=The reliability theory of aging and longevity |url= https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11613344 |journal=Journal of Theoretical Biology |volume=213 |issue=4 |pages=527–545 |doi=10.1006/jtbi.2001.2430 |pmid=11742523|bibcode=2001JThBi.213..527G |citeseerx=10.1.1.295.6141 }}</ref>

==See also==

• [[DNA damage theory of aging]]

==References==

{{reflist|refs=}}

<ref name=gav>Leonid A. Gavrilov, Natalia S. Gavrilova; V.P. Skulachev (ed.); John and Liliya Payne (trans.) (1991). ''The Biology of Life Span: A Quantitative Approach''. Chur; New York: Harwood Academic Publishers. ISBN 9783718649839.</ref>

<ref name=ieee>[s.n.] (1 September 2004). [https://web.archive.org/web/20140423124046/http://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/devices/engineering-and-aging-the-best-is-yet-to-be Engineering and Aging: The Best Is Yet to Be]. IEEE Spectrum. Archived 23 April 2014.</ref>

<ref name=rayl>A.J.S. Rayl (May 2002). <!--- please do not link to healthsters.com - copyright violation--->Aging, in Theory: A Personal Pursuit. Do body system redundancies hold the key? ''The Scientist'' '''16''' (10): 20.</ref>

}}

{{senescence}}

Line 30 ⟶ 23:

[[Category:Reliability engineering]]

[[Category:Failure]]

[[Category:Ageing]]

[[Category:Gerontology]]

[[Category:Survival analysis]]

[[Category:DemographyTheories of biological ageing]]

[[Category:Theories of aging]]

[[Category:Theories of biological aging]]