Content deleted Content added
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5 |
m Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot. |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 18:
There have been many attempts to develop a process model but so far none have been universally accepted. Part of the reason for this may be due to the fact that many of the process models were designed for a specific environment, such as law enforcement, and they therefore could not be readily applied in other environments such as incident response.<ref name="adams" /> This is a list of the main models since 2001 in chronological order:<ref name="adams" />
* The Abstract Digital Forensic Model (Reith, et al., 2002)
* The Integrated Digital Investigative Process (Carrier & Spafford, 2003) [https://web.archive.org/web/20181223073625/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/915b/524318e2f0689b586ba7ae89ea39e9b22ce3.pdf ]
* An Extended Model of Cybercrime Investigations (Ciardhuain, 2004)
* The Enhanced Digital Investigation Process Model (Baryamureeba & Tushabe, 2004)[https://www.dfrws.org/sites/default/files/session-files/pres-the_enhanced_digital_investigation_process_model.pdf ] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180401144648/https://www.dfrws.org/sites/default/files/session-files/pres-the_enhanced_digital_investigation_process_model.pdf |date=2018-04-01 }}
* The Digital Crime Scene Analysis Model (Rogers, 2004)
* A Hierarchical, Objectives-Based Framework for the Digital Investigations Process (Beebe & Clark, 2004)
* Framework for a Digital Investigation (Kohn, et al., 2006)[http://mo.co.za/open/dfframe.pdf ]
* The Four Step Forensic Process (Kent, et al., 2006)
* FORZA - Digital forensics investigation framework (Ieong, 2006)[https://dfrws.org/sites/default/files/session-files/paper-forza_-_digital_forensics_investigation_framework_that_incorporate_legal_issues.pdf ] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808232356/https://www.dfrws.org/sites/default/files/session-files/paper-forza_-_digital_forensics_investigation_framework_that_incorporate_legal_issues.pdf |date=2017-08-08 }}
* Process Flows for Cyber Forensics Training and Operations (Venter, 2006)
* The Common Process Model (Freiling & Schwittay, (2007) [https://www.imf-conference.org/imf2007/2%20Freiling%20common_model.pdf ]
* The Two-Dimensional Evidence Reliability Amplification Process Model (Khatir, et al., 2008)[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232619841_Two-Dimensional_Evidence_Reliability_Amplification_Process_Model_for_Digital_Forensics Two-Dimensional Evidence Reliability Amplification Process Model for Digital Forensics | Request PDF]
* The Digital Forensic Investigations Framework (Selamat, et al., 2008)
* The Systematic Digital Forensic Investigation Model (SRDFIM) (Agarwal, et al., 2011)[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228410430_Systematic_Digital_Forensic_Investigation_Model (PDF) Systematic Digital Forensic Investigation Model]
* The Advanced Data Acquisition Model (ADAM): A process model for digital forensic practice (Adams, 2012) [http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/14422/2/02Whole.pdf Research Portal]
==Seizure==
Line 85:
<ref name="first" >{{cite web|title='Electronic Crime Scene Investigation Guide: A Guide for First Responders|publisher=National Institute of Justice|year=2001|url=http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/187736.pdf}}</ref>
<ref name="casey">{{cite book|last=Casey|first=Eoghan|title=Digital Evidence and Computer Crime, Second Edition|year=2004|publisher=Elsevier|isbn=0-12-163104-4|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Xo8GMt_AbQsC&q=Digital%20Evidence%20and%20Computer%20Crime,%20Second%20Edition}}</ref>
<ref name="carrier" >{{cite web|last=Carrier|first=B|title=Defining digital forensic examination and analysis tools|citeseerx = 10.1.1.14.8953|publisher=Digital Research Workshop II|year=2001 |url=https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.14.8953}}</ref>
<ref name="horenbeeck">{{cite web|title=Technology Crime Investigation|url=http://www.daemon.be/maarten/forensics.html|accessdate=17 August 2010|author=Maarten Van Horenbeeck|date=24 May 2006|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080517022757/http://www.daemon.be/maarten/forensics.html|archivedate=17 May 2008}}</ref>
<ref name="ijde-2002" >{{cite web|title=An examination of digital forensic models|citeseerx = 10.1.1.13.9683|publisher=International Journal of Digital Evidence|author1=M Reith |author2=C Carr |author3=G Gunsch |year=2002 |url=https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.13.9683}}</ref>
<ref name="rule702" >{{cite web|title=Federal Rules of Evidence #702|url=http://federalevidence.com/rules-of-evidence#Rule702|accessdate=23 August 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100819114909/http://federalevidence.com/rules-of-evidence#Rule702|archive-date=19 August 2010|url-status=dead}}</ref>
<ref name="df-basics">{{cite web|last=Carrier|first=Brian D|title=Basic Digital Forensic Investigation Concepts|url=http://www.digital-evidence.org/di_basics.html|date=7 June 2006}}</ref>
Line 100:
==Further reading==
* {{cite journal|last=Carrier|first=Brian D.|title=Risks of live digital forensic analysis|journal=Communications of the ACM|date=February 2006|volume=49|issue=2|pages=56–61 |doi=10.1145/1113034.1113069|s2cid=16829457|url=http://portal.acm.org.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/citation.cfm?doid=1113034.1113069|accessdate=31 August 2010|issn=0001-0782|url-access=subscription}}
{{Digital forensics}}
| |||