Drug Interventions Programme: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:39, 11 September 2023

Latest revision as of 17:02, 25 May 2025

(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 18:

| archive-date = 2007-10-17

| url-status = dead

}}</ref> In their 2010 Drug Strategy, the Conservative / Liberal Democrat coalition state their continued intention to support DIP.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/alcohol-drugs/drugs/drug-strategy/drug-strategy-2010?view=Binary|title = Drug strategy 2010}}</ref><ref>[https://quest2recovery.com/ Drug Interventions Programme Guide]</ref>

==Overview==

Line 53:

===Test on Arrest===

Under the [[Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984]](PACE), it had been possible for police to drug test Detained Prisoners since 1984. The Drugs Act 2005 introduced, at selected "intensive DIP area" police stations, a mandatory drug test for every individual who had been arrested for a specified list of "trigger offences." Trigger offences were first set out in the Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000, and constitute a list of offences known have a clear link to substance misuse (such as [[Theft]]). Arrestees may also be tested for 'non-trigger' offences (including, for example, those related to prostitution) with the authority of a police inspector. Individuals who refused to take this test, a "non-intimate saliva sample", could face up to three months in [[police custodyArrest|custody]] and a £2,500 [[Fine (penalty)|fine]]. Individuals who tested positive were then compelled to undergo a two-part "Required Assessment" with a drug worker from their local DIP.

===Required Assessment===

Line 59:

===Restrictions on Bail===

Restrictions on Bail had been introduced under the [[Criminal Justice Act 2003]]. This piece of [[legislation]] amended the [[Bail Act 1976]] by reversing the presumption of [[bail]] to anyone who had tested positive tofor a class A drug, unless they agreed to undergo assessment and treatment with their local DIP for the duration of their court bail. This effectively obliged courts to implement a bail condition compelling such persons to attend their local DIP. The stated aim of this was to "prevent offending on bail". Failure to abide by this condition could result in the denial of further court [[bail]]. Restrictions on Bail was initially piloted in a number of areas but now operates across England and Wales

===Non-Intensive DIPs===

Line 73:

| archive-date = 2007-06-10

| url-status = dead

}}</ref>

}}</ref><ref>[https://ethancrossingspringfield.com/ Drug Rehab Ohio], 11 September 2023</ref>

==Controversy==