Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modular agile transit: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Modular agile transit.
 
Modular agile transit: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: var(--background-color-progressive-subtle, #F3F9FF); color: var(--color-base, inherit); margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-subtle, #AAAAAA);">
===[[:Modular agile transit]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:var(--color-error, red);">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|U}}
<!--Template:Afd top
 
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
 
The result was '''delete'''‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Reading Whoisjohngalt's "that seems reasonable" as a retraction of the keep !vote, we have no opposition to deletion. [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 02:20, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
===[[:Modular agile transit]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Modular agile transit}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modular agile transit|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 18#{{anchorencode:Modular agile transit}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1290929497/cur|edits since nomination]])
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Modular agile transit}})
The lead says ''". While not yet a standardized system, MAT represents an emerging idea in transportation research to address challenges".'' iI'm not sure that an evolving, conceptual notion meets WP Notability requirements. The article reads like ad brochure for a startup ... lots of bullet points. If there is no concrete product; and if there is no international standard ... what is there? A research project? Not sure that qualifies as encyclopedic.
 
There are several sources listed at bottom of article, but most are not _about_ the "Modular agile transit" ... most of the sources simply support individual facts stated in the article (but the sources do not mention the M.A.T.). [[User:Noleander|Noleander]] ([[User talk:Noleander|talk]]) 00:22, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Transportation|list of Transportation-related deletion discussions]]. '''[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">WC</span>''<span style="color:#999933">Quidditch</span>'']]''' [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style="color:#999933">✎</span>]] 00:33, 18 May 2025 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' Honestly surprised to see such a poor article from such a long-time editor. Cite 1 has the wrong DOI# but should link to [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0968090X22000729], which is a computer model about modular vehicles but is not about "agile" transit or an actual system. 2 is some totally irrelevant software source, 3 is about carsharing not transit, 4 seems relevant but is also just a model, 5 has a title that's merely about electric buses but the DOI link goes to something else, 6 seems relevant but is also just a computer model and does not use "agile", 7 is a good book but irrelevant, and 8 is also irrelevant. So the article is a lot of fluff, unsourced statements, and ref-bomb material. What is going on here? Like I understand what the article's getting at, but since it's just a research concept I agree with nom that this reads as a student article rather than something that should have a standalone page. [[User:Reywas92|Reywas92]]<sup>[[User talk:Reywas92|Talk]]</sup> 02:20, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
*:The faulty citations are characteristic of LLM output. With that in mind, I have to wonder if the rest of the article is LLM-generated as well. [[User:Omphalographer|Omphalographer]] ([[User talk:Omphalographer|talk]]) 01:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
*::Yes, I was thinking the same for this author's [[Repast (funeral)]], which I also AFDed.<span id="Reywas92:1747664917200:WikipediaFTTCLNArticles_for_deletion/Modular_agile_transit" class="FTTCmt"> [[User:Reywas92|Reywas92]]<sup>[[User talk:Reywas92|Talk]]</sup> 14:28, 19 May 2025 (UTC)</span>
* '''Keep''' – As the article’s primary author, I appreciate the feedback in this AfD and have significantly revised the article to address the raised concerns. The original version was overly complex and included some irrelevant sources, which I acknowledge made it read like a promotional piece. I have rewritten it into a concise Start-class article, focusing only on the core concept of modular transit supported by two peer-reviewed sources directly discussing the topic. These sources establish notability per [[WP:GNG]] by providing significant coverage of modular transit systems in reputable journals (Transportation Research Parts C and A). I've removed unsourced claims, bullet points, and promotional language to comply with [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:MOS]] and clarified that MAT is a research concept, not a product, addressing concerns about its "evolving notion" status. While not a deployed system, the concept’s coverage in academic literature makes it encyclopedic, similar to other research-stage transport concepts like [[Hyperloop]]. I'm open to further suggestions for improvement. [[User:Whoisjohngalt|Whoisjohngalt]] ([[User talk:Whoisjohngalt|talk]]) 16:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
**Thank you for eliminating the fluff, unsourced content, and ref-bomb sources. But as I implied there's now not enough content or sources to justify a standalone article on simply a research concept. Since both sources are about autonomous transit, [[Vehicular automation#Buses]] seems like a better place for a couple sentences to include the primary sources.<span id="Reywas92:1747761214366:WikipediaFTTCLNArticles_for_deletion/Modular_agile_transit" class="FTTCmt"> [[User:Reywas92|Reywas92]]<sup>[[User talk:Reywas92|Talk]]</sup> 17:13, 20 May 2025 (UTC)</span>
*** That seems reasonable, Thanks.[[User:Whoisjohngalt|Whoisjohngalt]] ([[User talk:Whoisjohngalt|talk]]) 18:39, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:var(--color-error, red)">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>