Content deleted Content added
GreenC bot (talk | contribs) Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#citeftp |
|||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
[[File:Biegeanimation 2D.gif|300px|thumb|Plastic deformation of a thin metal sheet.]]
'''Flow plasticity''' is a [[
In flow plasticity theories it is assumed that the total [[deformation (mechanics)|strain]] in a body can be decomposed additively (or multiplicatively) into an elastic part and a plastic part. The elastic part of the strain can be computed from a [[linear elasticity|linear elastic]] or [[hyperelastic material|hyperelastic]] constitutive model. However, determination of the plastic part of the strain requires a [[flow rule (plasticity)|flow rule]] and a [[hardening model (plasticity)|hardening model]].
== Small deformation theory ==
[[File:Rock plasticity compression plain.svg|thumb|right|300px|Stress-strain curve showing typical plastic behavior of materials in uniaxial compression. The strain can be decomposed into a recoverable elastic strain (<math>\varepsilon_e</math>) and an inelastic strain (<math>\varepsilon_p</math>). The stress at initial yield is <math>\sigma_0</math>. For strain hardening materials (as shown in the figure) the yield stress increases with increasing plastic deformation to a value of <math>\sigma_y</math>.]]
Typical flow plasticity theories for unidirectional loading (for small deformation perfect plasticity or hardening plasticity) are developed on the basis
# The material has a linear elastic range.
# The material has an elastic limit defined as the stress at which plastic deformation first takes place, i.e., <math>\sigma = \sigma_0</math>.
Line 15:
# The work done of a loading-unloading cycle is positive or zero, i.e., <math>d\sigma\,d\varepsilon = d\sigma\,(d\varepsilon_e + d\varepsilon_p) \ge 0</math>. This is also called the [[Drucker stability]] postulate and eliminates the possibility of strain softening behavior.
The above requirements can be expressed in three
* '''Elasticity''' ([[Hooke's law]]). In the linear elastic regime the stresses and strains in the
:::<math>
\boldsymbol{\sigma} = \mathsf{
</math>
:::where the stiffness matrix <math>\mathsf{
* '''Elastic limit''' ([[Yield surface]]). The elastic limit is defined by a yield surface that does not depend on the plastic strain and has the form
:::<math>
f(\boldsymbol{\sigma}) = 0 \,.
</math>
* '''Beyond the elastic limit'''. For strain hardening
:::<math>
f(\boldsymbol{\sigma}, \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_p) = 0 \,.
</math>
* '''Loading'''. For general states of stress, plastic '''loading''' is indicated if the state of stress is on the yield surface and the stress increment is directed toward the outside of the yield surface; this occurs if the inner product of the stress increment and the outward normal of the yield surface is positive, i.e.,
:::<math>
d\boldsymbol{\sigma}:\frac{\partial f}{\partial \boldsymbol{\sigma}} \ge 0 \,.
</math>
:::The above equation, when it is equal to zero, indicates a state of '''neutral loading''' where the stress state moves along the yield surface
* '''Unloading''': A similar argument is made for unloading for which situation <math> f < 0 </math>, the material is in the elastic ___domain, and
:::<math>
Line 80:
=== Kinematics of multiplicative plasticity ===
The concept of multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient into elastic and plastic parts was first proposed independently by [[Bruce Bilby|B. A. Bilby]],<ref>{{Citation|last1=Bilby|first1=B. A.|last2=Bullough|first2=R.|last3=Smith|first3= E.|year=1955|title= Continuous distributions of dislocations: a new application of the methods of non-Riemannian geometry|journal= [[Proceedings of the Royal Society
:<math>
\boldsymbol{F} = \boldsymbol{F}^e\cdot\boldsymbol{F}^p
</math>
where '''''F'''''<sup>e</sup> is the elastic (recoverable) part and '''''F'''''<sup>p</sup> is the plastic (unrecoverable) part of the deformation. The [[finite strain theory#Time-derivative of the deformation gradient|spatial velocity gradient]] is given by
:
:<math>
\begin{align}
Line 123 ⟶ 124:
\boldsymbol{M} := \tfrac{1}{2}(\boldsymbol{C}^e\cdot\boldsymbol{S} + \boldsymbol{S}\cdot\boldsymbol{C}^e)
</math>
where '''''S''''' is the [[stress measures|second Piola-Kirchhoff stress]]. A possible hyperelastic model in terms of the logarithmic strain is <ref>{{Citation|last=Anand|first= L.|year=1979|title= On H. Hencky's approximate strain-energy function for moderate deformations|journal=
:<math>
\boldsymbol{M} = \frac{\partial W}{\partial \boldsymbol{E}^e} = J\,\frac{dU}{dJ} + 2\mu\,\text{dev}(\boldsymbol{E}^e)
</math>
where ''W'' is a strain energy density function, ''J'' = det('''''F'''''), ''μ'' is a modulus, and "dev" indicates the deviatoric part of a tensor.
=== Flow rule ===
Application of the [[Clausius-Duhem inequality]] leads, in the absence of a plastic spin, to the finite strain flow rule
:<math>
\boldsymbol{D}^p = \dot{\lambda}\,\frac{\partial f}{\partial \boldsymbol{M}} \,.
</math>
=== Loading-unloading conditions ===
The loading-unloading conditions can be shown to be equivalent to the [[Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions]]
:<math>
\dot{\lambda} \ge 0 ~,~~ f \le 0~,~~ \dot{\lambda}\,f = 0 \,.
</math>
=== Consistency condition ===
The consistency condition is identical to that for the small strain case,
:<math>
\dot{\lambda}\,\dot{f} = 0 \,.
</math>
== References ==
Line 134 ⟶ 153:
== See also ==
* [[Plasticity (physics)]]
{{Authority control}}
[[Category:Continuum mechanics]]
| |||