Flow-through test: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:18, 4 July 2016

Latest revision as of 17:42, 28 May 2025

(15 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Type of chemical test in which a water sample flows through a system}}

<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled -->

{{cs1 config|name-list-style=vanc}}

{{Article for deletion/dated|page=Flow-through test|timestamp=20160630115527|year=2016|month=June|day=30|substed=yes}}

'''Flow-through tests''' or '''immunoconcentration assays'''<ref name="Bernard">{{cite journal | last1 = Bernard | first1 = Branson |title=Point-of-Care Rapid Tests for HIV Antibody |journal=J Lab Med |date=2003 |volume=27 |pages=288-295288–295 |url=http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/testing/resources/journal_article/J_Lab_Med_20031.htm |accessdate=3 July 2016 |url-status=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120503112410/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/testing/resources/journal_article/J_Lab_Med_20031.htm |accessdatearchivedate=May 3, July2012 2016}}</ref> are a type of diagnostic assay that allows users to test for the presence of a [[biomarker]], usually a specific [[antibody]], in a sample such as blood. They are a type of [[point of care]] test, a test designed to be used by a healthcare provider at patient contact. Point of care tests often allow for rapid detection of a specific biomarker without specialized lab equipment and training; this aids in diagnosis and allows therapeutic action to be initiated more quickly. Flow-through tests began development in the early 1980s and were the first type of immunostrip to be developed, although [[lateral flow test]]s have subsequently become the dominant immunostrip point of care device.<ref name="John">{{cite journal |last1 vauthors = St John|first1=Andrew|last2= A, Price CP |first2=Christopher| title = Existing and Emerging Technologies for Point-of-Care Testing | journal =Clin BiochemThe Clinical RevBiochemist. Reviews / Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists |date=2014| volume = 35 | issue = 3 | pages =155–167 155–67 |url date =http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4204237/ August 2014 |accessdate pmid =3 July25336761 | pmc = 4204237 2016}}</ref>

<!-- Once discussion is closed, please place on talk page: {{Old AfD multi|page=Flow-through test|date=30 June 2016|result='''keep'''}} -->

<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->

{{multiple issues|

{{COI|date=June 2016}}

{{original research|date=June 2016}}

{{primary sources|date=June 2016}}

}}

{{Orphan|date=September 2013}}

'''Flow-through tests''' or '''immunoconcentration assays'''

<ref name="Bernard">{{cite journal|last1=Bernard|first1=Branson|title=Point-of-Care Rapid Tests for HIV Antibody|journal=J Lab Med|date=2003|volume=27|pages=288-295|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20120503112410/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/testing/resources/journal_article/J_Lab_Med_20031.htm|accessdate=3 July 2016}}</ref> are a type of diagnostic assay that allows users to test for the presence of a biomarker, usually a specific [[antibody]], in a sample such as blood. They are a type of [[point of care]] test, a test designed to be used by a healthcare provider at patient contact. Point of care tests often allow for rapid detection of a specific biomarker without specialized lab equipment and training; this aids in diagnosis and allows therapeutic action to be initiated more quickly. Flow-through tests began development in the early 1980s and were the first type of immunostrip to be developed, although [[lateral flow test]]s have subsequently become the dominant immunostrip point of care device.<ref name="John">{{cite journal|last1=St John|first1=Andrew|last2=Price|first2=Christopher|title=Existing and Emerging Technologies for Point-of-Care Testing|journal=Clin Biochem Rev.|date=2014|volume=35|pages=155–167|url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4204237/|accessdate=3 July 2016}}</ref>

== History ==

The first flow-through test was developed in 1985 to test for the presence of [[Human chorionic gonadotropin|beta-human chorionic gonadotropin]] in urine.<ref name="John"/><ref name="Valkirs">{{cite journal |last1 vauthors = Valkirs|first1=Gunars|last2= GE, Barton R |first2=Richard| title =ImmunoConcentration—a ImmunoConcentration — a new format for solid-phase immunoassays | journal =Clin ChemClinical Chemistry | volume = 31 | issue = 9 | pages = 1427–31 | date = September 1985 |volume doi = 10.1093/clinchem/31.9.1427 |pages pmid =1427-1431 4028392 | url = http://www.clinchem.org/content/31/9/1427.long |accessdate url-access =4 Julysubscription 2016}}</ref>

== Principle of flow-through tests ==

Flow-through assays are by principle binding- assays.<ref name="Valkirs" /> In practice, they are mostly applied to detect the interaction of an [[antibody]], as from e.g.a sample of the test-subjects subject's blood-sample, with immobilized [[antigen]]s, resulting in the formation of an antigen-antibody complex.{{citation needed|date=July 2016}} However, other types of capture-assays are technically feasible; this also, includesincluding small molecule capture-assays or antigen tests.<ref name="Valkirs" /> Flow-through assays for the detection of [[mycotoxins]], based on [[enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay|ELISA]], have been available since the 1980s and can be used in field analyses.<ref name="Zheng">{{cite journal | vauthors = Zheng MZ, Richard JL, Binder J | title = A review of rapid methods for the analysis of mycotoxins | journal = Mycopathologia | volume = 161 | issue = 5 | pages = 261–73 | date = May 2006 | pmid = 16649076 | doi = 10.1007/s11046-006-0215-6 | s2cid = 6667768 }}</ref>

Flow-through tests typically come in the form of cassettes divided into four parts: an upper casing, a reactive membrane panel, an absorbent panel, and a lower casing.<ref name="overview">{{cite web|title=Flow-through tests, an overview|url=http://sites.path.org/dx/rapid-dx/technologies/flow-through/|publisher=PATH|accessdate=4 July 2016}}</ref> To beperform performeda test, a diluted sample is applied to the reactive membrane panel where itand flows through to the absorbent pad, with the target analyte being captured in the membrane.<ref name="overview"/><ref name="works">{{cite web|title=Flow-through: how it works|url=http://sites.path.org/dx/rapid-dx/technologies/flow-through/how-it-works/|publisher=PATH|accessdate=4 July 2016}}</ref> The membrane is then washed to remove unbound, non-target molecules, washed again with a solution containing a signal reagent, and washed again to remove unbound signal reagent.<ref name="overview"/><ref name="works"/> If the analyte was present in the original sample, then by the end of this process it should be bound to the membrane, with the signal reagent bound to it, revealing (usually through visual meansvisually) the presence of the analyte on the membrane.<ref name="overview"/><ref name="works"/>

== Advantages and disadvantages ==

Flow-through tests can be performed quickermore quickly than lateral flow tests.<ref name="overview"/> They exhibit good sensitivity to antibodies, but their detection of antigens is generally less sensitive than lateral flow tests.<ref name="overview"/>

== References ==

Flow-through tests can be performed quicker than lateral flow tests.<ref name="overview"/> They exhibit good sensitivity to antibodies, but their detection of antigens is generally less sensitive than lateral flow tests.<ref name="overview"/>

==References==

{{reflist}}