Wikipedia

Talk:String theory/Archive index: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Legobot (talk | contribs)
Bots
1,703,078 edits
m BOT: Updating index
Legobot (talk | contribs)
Bots
1,703,078 edits
Bot: Updating index
 
(43 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1:
<!-- HBC Archive Indexerbot can blank this -->

Report generated based on a request from [[Talk:String theory]]. It matches the following masks: Talk:String theory/Archive <#>, Talk:String theory.<br>
{{last edited by}}
<br />
It was generated at 04:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC) by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]].
{| class="sortable"
! Discussion Topic !! Replies (estimated) !! Archive Link
 
|-
| Miscellaneous comments || 43 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#Miscellaneous%20comments comments]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Fixed article a bit || 2 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#Fixed%20article%20a%20bit article a bit]]
 
|-
| Two questions and clarifications || 32 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#Two%20questions%20and%20clarifications questions and clarifications]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
Line 18 ⟶ 19:
 
|-
| "&#34;String theory, as with any current theory of quantum gravity, is unverifiable, and therefore it is also unfalsifiable."&#34; || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#%22String%20theory%2C%20as%20with%20any%20current%20theory%20of%20quantum%20gravity%2C%20is%20unverifiable%2C%20and%20therefore%20it%20is%20also%20unfalsifiable&#34;String theory, as with any current theory of quantum gravity, is unverifiable, and therefore it is also unfalsifiable.%22&#34;]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Superstring theory || 2 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#Superstring%20theory theory]]
 
|-
| what about the philosophy of a sphere? || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#what%20about%20the%20philosophy%20of%20a%20sphere%3F about the philosophy of a sphere?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Troublegarden withhose this articlething || 01 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#Trouble%20with%20this%20articlegarden hose thing]]
 
|-
| QuestionNot about timetestable? || 19 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#Question%20about%20timeNot testable?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| gardenProblem hosewith thingString Theory Problems || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#garden%20hose%20thingProblem with String Theory Problems]]
 
|-
| QuestionWhat is wrong with string theory? || 01 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#QuestionWhat is wrong with string theory?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| How does string theory explain matter/anti-matter anihilation?Consciousness || 05 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#How%20does%20string%20theory%20explain%20matter/anti-matter%20anihilation%3FConsciousness]]
 
|-
| Extrapeople Dimentionsworking on string theory || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#Extra%20Dimentionspeople working on string theory]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| NotQuestion testable?- Re Popper || 98 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#Not%20testable%3FQuestion - Re Popper]]
 
|-
| ProblemFalse withVacuum String Theory ProblemsDecay || 27 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#Problem%20with%20String%20Theory%20ProblemsFalse Vacuum Decay]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| MultipleSome Dimensionsbasic caveats added by 67.169.24.49 || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#Multiple%20DimensionsSome basic caveats added by 67.169.24.49]]
 
|-
| What is wrong with string theory?Sidebar || 16 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#What%20is%20wrong%20with%20string%20theory%3FSidebar]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ConsciousnessPataphysics criticism added by 172.135.99.87 || 51 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#ConsciousnessPataphysics criticism added by 172.135.99.87]]
 
|-
| peopleDimensions workingand on string theoryMeasurement. || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#people%20working%20on%20string%20theoryDimensions and Measurement.]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| QuestionPataphysics -a Revalid Popperaddition to the critical nomenclature of string theory || 81 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#Question%20-%20Re%20PopperPataphysics a valid addition to the critical nomenclature of string theory]]
 
|-
| SomeMultiple basic caveats added by 67.169.24.49Dimensions || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#Some%20basic%20caveats%20added%20by%2067.169.24.49Multiple Dimensions]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| SidebarString hypothesis? || 63 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 12#SidebarString hypothesis?]]
 
|-
| &#34;South Pole Neutrino Detector Could Yield Evidences of String Theory&#34; || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#&#34;South Pole Neutrino Detector Could Yield Evidences of String Theory&#34;]]
| Pataphysics criticism added by 172.135.99.87 || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 1#Pataphysics%20criticism%20added%20by%20172.135.99.87]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| DimensionsAnon and Measurement.comment || 13 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 12#Dimensions%20and%20Measurement.Anon comment]]
 
|-
| PataphysicsWeird aanonymous valid addition to the critical nomenclature of string theorydeletions || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 12#Pataphysics%20a%20valid%20addition%20to%20the%20critical%20nomenclature%20of%20string%20theoryWeird anonymous deletions]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FalseString Vacuumtheory Decayis indeed testable and falsifiable and verifiable || 75 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 12#False%20Vacuum%20DecayString theory is indeed testable and falsifiable and verifiable]]
 
|-
| Assessmentdeleting commenta formula || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 12#Assessment%20commentdeleting a formula]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| StringFalsifiable hypothesis?vs. predictive || 38 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#String%20hypothesis%3FFalsifiable vs. predictive]]
 
|-
| "SouthQuestionable Polesentence Neutrinoin Detector Could Yield Evidences of String Theory"&#34;History&#34; || 02 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#%22South%20Pole%20Neutrino%20Detector%20Could%20Yield%20Evidences%20of%20String%20Theory%22Questionable sentence in &#34;History&#34;]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| AnonTable commentcorrected || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Anon%20commentTable corrected]]
 
|-
| Weirdstring anonymoustheory &#61; deletionsB.S. || 17 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Weird%20anonymous%20deletionsstring theory &#61; B.S.]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| String theory is indeed testable and falsifiable andrecent verifiableedits || 52 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#String%20theory%20is%20indeed%20testable%20and%20falsifiable%20and%20verifiablerecent edits]]
 
|-
| Bad&#34;Evidence Sentenceof instring Historytheory?&#34; Sectionsection || 01 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Bad%20Sentence%20in%20History%20Section&#34;Evidence of string theory?&#34; section]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| deletingFalse a formulahistory || 113 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#deleting%20a%20formulaFalse history]]
 
|-
| FalsifiableEditing vs.the predictiveOverview || 81 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Falsifiable%20vs.%20predictiveEditing the Overview]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| QuestionableCan&#39;t sentenceedit inFootnotes "History"Section || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Questionable%20sentence%20in%20%22History%22Can&#39;t edit Footnotes Section]]
 
|-
| TableBrief correctedQuestion || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Table%20correctedBrief Question]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| stringEdits theorymade =on B.S.11th September || 75 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#string%20theory%20%3D%20B.S.Edits made on 11th September]]
 
|-
| recentJust editsa question. || 2 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#recent%20editsJust a question.]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| "EvidenceMade ofsome string theory?" sectioncorrections || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#%22Evidence%20of%20string%20theory%3F%22%20sectionMade some corrections]]
 
|-
| FalseNumber historyof Dimensions || 134 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#False%20historyNumber of Dimensions]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| EditingModel theor OverviewFramework? || 14 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Editing%20the%20OverviewModel or Framework?]]
 
|-
| BriefGA QuestionRe-Review and In-line citations || 26 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Brief%20QuestionGA Re-Review and In-line citations]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Can't edit Footnotes SectionQuestion || 13 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Can%27t%20edit%20Footnotes%20SectionQuestion]]
 
|-
| Edits madeArchive on 11th SeptemberBox || 51 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Edits%20made%20on%2011th%20SeptemberArchive Box]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| JustAssessment a question.comment || 23 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 21#Just%20a%20question.Assessment comment]]
 
|-
| MadeAdded some correctionsSection || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Made%20some%20correctionsAdded Section]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| NumberThe neutrality of Dimensionsthis article is disputed. || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Number%20of%20DimensionsThe neutrality of this article is disputed.]]
 
|-
| ModelAdded or Framework?Sentence || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Model%20or%20Framework%3FAdded Sentence]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| GAInformation Re-Reviewon andextra In-line citationsdimensions? || 62 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#GA%20Re-Review%20and%20In-line%20citationsInformation on extra dimensions?]]
 
|-
| QuestionA speculation on the 10 dimensions || 32 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#QuestionA speculation on the 10 dimensions]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| AddedReferences Sectionand Popper || 14 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Added%20SectionReferences and Popper]]
 
|-
| Archive BoxVerifiability || 14 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Archive%20BoxVerifiability]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| The&#34;want neutrality of this article is disputed.to&#34;? || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#The%20neutrality%20of%20this%20article%20is%20disputed.&#34;want to&#34;?]]
 
|-
| Added SentenceHuh? || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Added%20SentenceHuh?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Information on extra dimensions?Introduction... || 23 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Information%20on%20extra%20dimensions%3FIntroduction...]]
 
|-
| AAnalogy speculationwith onGuitar the 10 dimensionsStrings || 23 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#A%20speculation%20on%20the%2010%20dimensionsAnalogy with Guitar Strings]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| References and PopperEclipse || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#References%20and%20PopperEclipse]]
 
|-
| VerifiabilityString Theory vs. Superstring Theory || 43 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#VerifiabilityString Theory vs. Superstring Theory]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| "wantDirectly Testable Alternative to"? String Theory || 23 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#%22want%20to%22%3FDirectly Testable Alternative to String Theory]]
 
|-
| Huh?Overview not up to standard || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Huh%3FOverview not up to standard]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Introduction...Clarification || 3 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Introduction...Clarification]]
 
|-
| AnalogyQuantum with Guitar Stringsstrings ? || 32 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Analogy%20with%20Guitar%20StringsQuantum strings ?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| EclipseString theory stub || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#EclipseString theory stub]]
 
|-
| StringNew Theoryarticle vs.on SuperstringString Theoryduality ? || 23 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#New article on String%20Theory%20vs.%20Superstring%20Theory duality ?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| DirectlyToo Testablemuch Alternativerepetitive to String Theoryinfo. ? || 31 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Directly%20Testable%20Alternative%20to%20String%20TheoryToo much repetitive info. ?]]
 
|-
| Overview not up to standardMirman || 17 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Overview%20not%20up%20to%20standardMirman]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ClarificationAsians? || 3 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#ClarificationAsians?]]
 
|-
| ThanksWhere forare that&#39;the same set of equations&#39; ? || 13 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Thanks%20for%20thatWhere are &#39;the same set of equations&#39; ?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| QuantumSupersymmetry stringsand ?String Theory || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Quantum%20strings%20%3FSupersymmetry and String Theory]]
 
|-
| StringRemoved theorydead stublink || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#String%20theory%20stubRemoved dead link]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| NewThanks articlefor on String duality ?that || 32 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#New%20article%20on%20String%20duality%20%3FThanks for that]]
 
|-
| TooPredicted muchextra repetitive info. ?dimensions || 14 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Too%20much%20repetitive%20info.%20%3FPredicted extra dimensions]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| MirmanLast Edit || 72 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#MirmanLast Edit]]
 
|-
| Asians?Problems with String Theory || 37 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Asians%3FProblems with String Theory]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| WhereBackground are 'the same set of equations' ?Independence || 34 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Where%20are%20%27the%20same%20set%20of%20equations%27%20%3FBackground Independence]]
 
|-
| SupersymmetryTechnical and String TheoryPage? || 13 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Supersymmetry%20and%20String%20TheoryTechnical Page?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| RemovedIntegrated dead linkFunctionality??? || 17 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Removed%20dead%20linkIntegrated Functionality???]]
 
|-
| PredictedSome extrarestraint dimensionsin adding preprints || 43 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Predicted%20extra%20dimensionsSome restraint in adding preprints]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| LastWebsite Editabout String Theory and the 10 Dimensions. || 23 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Last%20EditWebsite about String Theory and the 10 Dimensions.]]
 
|-
| ProblemsPrinceton physicists connect string theory with Stringestablished Theoryphysics || 71 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Problems%20with%20String%20TheoryPrinceton physicists connect string theory with established physics]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BackgroundUhhhh... IndependenceWow. || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Background%20IndependenceUhhhh... Wow.]]
 
|-
| TechnicalTesting Page?String Theory || 31 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Technical%20Page%3FTesting String Theory]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| IntegratedRemoved Functionality???an apparently incorrect quotation || 61 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Integrated%20Functionality%3F%3F%3FRemoved an apparently incorrect quotation]]
 
|-
| SomeRemoved restraint in adding preprintsquote || 31 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Some%20restraint%20in%20adding%20preprintsRemoved quote]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| WebsiteWhat aboutis Stringthe Theorymeaning andof the 10 Dimensions.remark? || 31 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Website%20about%20String%20Theory%20and%20the%2010%20Dimensions.What is the meaning of the remark?]]
 
|-
| Princetonlink physiciststo connectpseudoscientific stringexplanation theory with established physicsdeleted || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Princeton%20physicists%20connect%20string%20theory%20with%20established%20physicslink to pseudoscientific explanation deleted]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Uhhhh... Wow.Preface || 14 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Uhhhh...%20Wow.Preface]]
 
|-
| TestingRemoved String TheoryLine || 13 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Testing%20String%20TheoryRemoved Line]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| RemovedString anTheory apparentlyis incorrecta quotationtightly constrained theory? || 13 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Removed%20an%20apparently%20incorrect%20quotationString Theory is a tightly constrained theory?]]
 
|-
| RemovedA quotesensible quantum gravity? || 13 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Removed%20quoteA sensible quantum gravity?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| WhatDoes isstring theory predict the meaningnumber of thespace-time remarkdimensions? || 14 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#What%20is%20the%20meaning%20of%20the%20remark%3FDoes string theory predict the number of space-time dimensions?]]
 
|-
| linkguitar tostring pseudoscientific explanation deletedanalogy || 13 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#link%20to%20pseudoscientific%20explanation%20deletedguitar string analogy]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| PrefaceAdded diagram || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#PrefaceAdded diagram]]
 
|-
| RemovedVERIFICATION, LineFALSIFICATION, PHILSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND STRING THEORY || 34 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Removed%20LineVERIFICATION, FALSIFICATION, PHILSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND STRING THEORY]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| String Theory is a tightly constrained theory?Kaluza-Klein || 3 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#String%20Theory%20is%20a%20tightly%20constrained%20theory%3FKaluza-Klein]]
 
|-
| AToo sensiblemuch quantum gravityjargon? || 3 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#A%20sensible%20quantum%20gravity%3FToo much jargon?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| DoesUnified stringField theory predict the number of space-time dimensions?Theory || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Does%20string%20theory%20predict%20the%20number%20of%20space-time%20dimensions%3FUnified Field Theory]]
 
|-
| guitarOpinion stringon analogy&#34;relative-ness&#34; of extra dimensions? || 31 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#guitar%20string%20analogyOpinion on &#34;relative-ness&#34; of extra dimensions?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| AddedCurrent/planned projects to find evidence of string theory diagramsection? || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Added%20diagramCurrent/planned projects to find evidence of string theory section?]]
 
|-
| VERIFICATION,Description FALSIFICATION,of PHILSOPHYan OFatom SCIENCE AND STRING THEORYwrong || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#VERIFICATION%2C%20FALSIFICATION%2C%20PHILSOPHY%20OF%20SCIENCE%20AND%20STRING%20THEORYDescription of an atom wrong]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Kaluza-KleinHistory of String Theory (&#38; SUSY) || 34 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Kaluza-KleinHistory of String Theory (&#38; SUSY)]]
 
|-
| TooTen muchvs. jargon?Eleven || 31 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Too%20much%20jargon%3FTen vs. Eleven]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| UnifiedCompact Fielddimensions : Structure vs TheoryHolonomy || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Unified%20Field%20TheoryCompact dimensions : Structure vs Holonomy]]
 
|-
| OpinionNew on "relative-ness" of extra dimensions?image || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Opinion%20on%20%22relative-ness%22%20of%20extra%20dimensions%3FNew image]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Current/plannedLoopholes projects to find evidence of string theoryand section?Implications || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Current/planned%20projects%20to%20find%20evidence%20of%20string%20theory%20section%3FLoopholes and Implications]]
 
|-
| DescriptionOn of an atom wrongTerminology || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Description%20of%20an%20atom%20wrongOn Terminology]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| History of String Theory (& SUSY)Weaseling || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#History%20of%20String%20Theory%20%28%26%20SUSY%29Weaseling]]
 
|-
| TenSimplified vs. Elevenversion? || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Ten%20vs.%20ElevenSimplified version?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| GreatNonsymmetric Article!Tensor || 01 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Great%20Article%21Nonsymmetric Tensor]]
 
|-
| Tachyon has "&#34;imaginary"&#34; mass, or "&#34;negative"&#34; mass, or something else altogether? || 2 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Tachyon%20has%20%22imaginary%22%20mass%2C%20or%20%22negative%22%20mass%2C%20or%20something%20else%20altogether%3F has &#34;imaginary&#34; mass, or &#34;negative&#34; mass, or something else altogether?]]▼
| Compact dimensions : Structure vs Holonomy || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Compact%20dimensions%20%3A%20Structure%20vs%20Holonomy]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Newsubatomic imagelevel || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#New%20imagesubatomic level]]
 
|-
| Loopholeslack andof Implicationsquantitative data || 27 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 23#Loopholes%20and%20Implicationslack of quantitative data]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Onconceptual Terminologyinconsistency || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 23#On%20Terminologyconceptual inconsistency]]
 
|-
| WeaselingUnreferenced speculation || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 23#WeaselingUnreferenced speculation]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| SimplifiedHistory version?Section || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 23#Simplified%20version%3FHistory Section]]
 
|-
| NonsymmetricString Theory Makes No TensorPredictions || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 23#Nonsymmetric%20TensorString Theory Makes No Predictions]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| HistoryIs string theory falsifiable? || 122 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#HistoryIs string theory falsifiable?]]▼
▲| Tachyon has "imaginary" mass, or "negative" mass, or something else altogether? || 2 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 2#Tachyon%20has%20%22imaginary%22%20mass%2C%20or%20%22negative%22%20mass%2C%20or%20something%20else%20altogether%3F]]
 
|-
| subatomicGA levelReassessment || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 23#subatomic%20levelGA Reassessment]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| UnreferencedPopular speculationculture section || 128 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#Unreferenced%20speculationPopular culture section]]
 
|-
| lackString oftheory quantitativeis dataBS || 74 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#lack%20of%20quantitative%20dataString theory is BS]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| conceptualSparticles inconsistencyand Superpartners || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#conceptual%20inconsistencySparticles and Superpartners]]
 
|-
| Historyan Sectioninteresting article || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#History%20Sectionan interesting article]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| StringMathematics Theoryof MakesString No Predictionstheory || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#Mathematics of String%20Theory%20Makes%20No%20Predictions theory]]
 
|-
| GAHistory Reassessmentsection again || 112 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#GA%20ReassessmentHistory section again]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| StringSomething theoryto isconsider BS... || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#String%20theory%20is%20BSSomething to consider ...]]
 
|-
| IsHow stringWould theoryYou Find falsifiableStrings? || 224 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#Is%20string%20theory%20falsifiable%3FHow Would You Find Strings?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| SparticlesIs andstring Superpartnerstheory predictive? || 23 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#Sparticles%20and%20SuperpartnersIs string theory predictive?]]
 
|-
| anString interestingtheory, articleM-brane, whatever || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#an%20interesting%20articleString theory, M-brane, whatever]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Popular culture sectionTags || 2817 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#Popular%20culture%20sectionTags]]
 
|-
| HistoryTheory, sectionor againHypothesis? || 123 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#History%20section%20againTheory, or Hypothesis?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Mathematics of String theoryWhat? || 27 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#Mathematics%20of%20String%20theoryWhat?]]
 
|-
| SomethingNO to consider ...THEORY || 13 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#Something%20to%20consider%20...NO THEORY]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| IsI stringdon&#39;t theoryreally predictive?get how strings work. || 32 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#Is%20string%20theory%20predictive%3FI don&#39;t really get how strings work.]]
 
|-
| StringI theory,don´t M-brane,like whateverthe first picture || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#String%20theory%2C%20M-brane%2C%20whateverI don´t like the first picture]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| HowBrane WouldWorld Youscenario Find Strings?section || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 35#How%20Would%20You%20Find%20Strings%3FBrane World scenario section]]
 
|-
| TagsWhat&#39;s new ? || 171 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#TagsWhat&#39;s new ?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Theory,Cutting orthe Hypothesis?lead || 3 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#Theory%2C%20or%20Hypothesis%3FCutting the lead]]
 
|-
| NOCritical THEORYdimension and consistency || 31 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#NO%20THEORYCritical dimension and consistency]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| IConsciousness don'tas really get howvibrating strings work. || 23 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 34#I%20don%27t%20really%20get%20how%20strings%20work.Consciousness as vibrating strings]]
 
|-
| I don´t like the first pictureHistory || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#I%20don%C2%B4t%20like%20the%20first%20pictureHistory]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| What's new ?Falsifiability || 17 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 34#What%27s%20new%20%3FFalsifiability]]
 
|-
| CriticalExaggeration dimensionregarding testability and consistencyscience || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 34#Critical%20dimension%20and%20consistencyExaggeration regarding testability and science]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| What?Construction || 71 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 35#What%3FConstruction]]
 
|-
| CuttingPossible thestrings leadas fibers instead of circles. || 31 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 34#Cutting%20the%20leadPossible strings as fibers instead of circles.]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| &#34;11-dimensional space&#34; was corrected to &#34;11-dimensional spacetime&#34; || 2 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 4#&#34;11-dimensional space&#34; was corrected to &#34;11-dimensional spacetime&#34;]]
▲| History || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 3#History]]
 
|-
| Consciousness as vibrating stringsTestable? || 32 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 4#Consciousness%20as%20vibrating%20stringsTestable?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ExaggerationGood regarding testability and scienceArticle || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 4#Exaggeration%20regarding%20testability%20and%20scienceGood Article]]
 
|-
| Possible strings as fibers instead of circles.Formula? || 13 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 4#Possible%20strings%20as%20fibers%20instead%20of%20circles.Formula?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Testable?How to test it. || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 4#Testable%3FHow to test it.]]
 
|-
| Falsifiability&#34;Correct&#34; || 75 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 4#Falsifiability&#34;Correct&#34;]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| "11-dimensionalHow space"is wasthe correctedstring to "11-dimensionaltheory spacetime"scientific? || 210 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 4#%2211-dimensional%20space%22%20was%20corrected%20to%20%2211-dimensional%20spacetime%22How is the string theory scientific?]]
 
|-
| GoodUnified ArticleStrings (u21s19) Theory - NASA Conference Presentation || 23 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 4#Good%20ArticleUnified Strings (u21s19) Theory - NASA Conference Presentation]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Formula?Two small points on history || 32 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 4#Formula%3FTwo small points on history]]
 
|-
| Howwidely believed to testbe it.consistant? || 16 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 4#How%20to%20test%20it.widely believed to be consistant?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| "Correct"Popper and testability || 519 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 4#%22Correct%22Popper and testability]]
 
|-
| UnifiedPopper Stringstestability (u21s19)following Theoryfrom -testability NASAof Conferencedependent Presentationtheories. || 382 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 4#Unified%20Strings%20%28u21s19%29%20Theory%20-%20NASA%20Conference%20PresentationPopper testability following from testability of dependent theories.]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| HowOther is the string theory scientific?falsifications || 1059 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 45#How%20is%20the%20string%20theory%20scientific%3FOther falsifications]]
 
|-
| TwoNew smallintro pointsto onprediction historysection || 26 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 45#Two%20small%20points%20on%20historyNew intro to prediction section]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| "&#34; The theory has yet to make novel experimental predictions at accessible energy scales, leading some scientists to claim that it cannot be considered a part of [[science]]"&#34; || 3 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 5#%22%20The%20theory%20has%20yet%20to%20make%20novel%20experimental%20predictions%20at%20accessible%20energy%20scales%2C%20leading%20some%20scientists%20to%20claim%20that%20it%20cannot%20be%20considered%20a%20part%20of%20science%22&#34; The theory has yet to make novel experimental predictions at accessible energy scales, leading some scientists to claim that it cannot be considered a part of science&#34;]]▼
| widely believed to be consistant? || 6 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 4#widely%20believed%20to%20be%20consistant%3F]]
 
|-
| PopperMissing and testabilityword? || 192 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 45#Popper%20and%20testabilityMissing word?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| PopperThe testabilityString followingTheory fromis testabilitynot of dependent theories.science || 825 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 45#Popper%20testability%20following%20from%20testability%20of%20dependent%20theories.The String Theory is not science]]
 
|-
| OtherEdit falsificationsrequest on 7 September 2012 || 592 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 5#Other%20falsificationsEdit request on 7 September 2012]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BraneNew WorldString scenarioTheory sectionWebsite for the general public || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 5#Brane%20World%20scenario%20sectionNew String Theory Website for the general public]]
 
|-
| ConstructionUh... || 2 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 5#ConstructionUh...]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| NewIn introlayman toterms, predictionstring sectiontheory is what? || 62 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 5#New%20intro%20to%20prediction%20sectionIn layman terms, string theory is what?]]
 
|-
| Missing word?Unintelligible || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 5#Missing%20word%3FUnintelligible]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| &#34;Theory&#34; vs. &#34;research framework&#34; || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 5#&#34;Theory&#34; vs. &#34;research framework&#34;]]
▲| " The theory has yet to make novel experimental predictions at accessible energy scales, leading some scientists to claim that it cannot be considered a part of [[science]]" || 3 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 5#%22%20The%20theory%20has%20yet%20to%20make%20novel%20experimental%20predictions%20at%20accessible%20energy%20scales%2C%20leading%20some%20scientists%20to%20claim%20that%20it%20cannot%20be%20considered%20a%20part%20of%20science%22]]
 
|-
| EditLittle request on 7 September 2012things... || 23 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 5#Edit%20request%20on%207%20September%202012Little things...]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| New String Theory Website forWhy the generalrefimprove publictag ? || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 5#New%20String%20Theory%20Website%20for%20the%20general%20publicWhy the refimprove tag ?]]
 
|-
| Uh...The &#34;Criticisms&#34; section || 24 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 5#Uh...The &#34;Criticisms&#34; section]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| InThree laymanspatial terms,dimensions stringimplied theory is(in whatinflation)? || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 5#In%20layman%20terms%2C%20string%20theory%20is%20what%3FThree spatial dimensions implied (in inflation)?]]
 
|-
| TheUnbalanced StringCriticism Theorysection is&#38; notpossibly sciencemore || 526 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 56#The%20String%20Theory%20is%20not%20scienceUnbalanced Criticism section &#38; possibly more]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| UnintelligibleA lack of mathematical language || 13 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 56#UnintelligibleA lack of mathematical language]]
 
|-
| LittleA things...clear explanation of the problems it solves is needed || 31 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 56#Little%20things...A clear explanation of the problems it solves is needed]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Why the refimprove tagOne dimentional? || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 56#Why%20the%20refimprove%20tag%20%3FOne dimentional?]]
 
|-
| The "Criticisms" sectionExplanations || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 56#The%20%22Criticisms%22%20sectionExplanations]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| "Theory"&#34;Failure&#34; vs.claim "researchappears framework"unsupported || 123 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 56#%22Theory%22%20vs.%20%22research%20framework%22&#34;Failure&#34; claim appears unsupported]]
 
|-
| ThreeLede, spatialre dimensionsgravity: impliedIs (in&#34;Besides inflation)this potential role...&#34; redundant? || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 56#Three%20spatial%20dimensions%20implied%20%28in%20inflation%29%3FLede, re gravity: Is &#34;Besides this potential role...&#34; redundant?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| 11 dimensions (11-dimensional) || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#11 dimensions (11-dimensional)]]
| Unbalanced Criticism section & [[Talk:String_theory#This_article_has_a_conspicuous_lack_of_mathematical_language.2C_which_is_at_the_crux_of_String_Theory_._._._Many_of_the_individuals_who_make_edits_seem_ignorant_of_basic_math_concepts.|possibly more]] || 18 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Unbalanced%20Criticism%20section%20%26%20possibly%20more]]
 
|-
| AString clearTheory/Quantum explanation of the problems it solves is neededPhysics || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#A%20clear%20explanation%20of%20the%20problems%20it%20solves%20is%20neededString Theory/Quantum Physics]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| OneString theory dimentionalproven? || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#One%20dimentional%3FString theory proven?]]
 
|-
| Lede,External relinks gravity: Is "Besides this potential role..." redundant?modified || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Lede%2C%20re%20gravity%3A%20Is%20%22Besides%20this%20potential%20role...%22%20redundant%3FExternal links modified]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| "Failure"Krauss claim appears unsupportedquote || 31 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#%22Failure%22%20claim%20appears%20unsupportedKrauss quote]]
 
|-
| A lack of mathematical languagePhenomenology || 34 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#A%20lack%20of%20mathematical%20languagePhenomenology]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| 11Superstring Theory 10-Dimensions and Supergravity dimensionsTheory (11-dimensional)Dimensions || 13 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Superstring Theory 10-Dimensions and Supergravity Theory 11%20dimensions%20%2811-dimensional%29Dimensions]]
 
|-
| StringThis Theory/Quantumarticle Physicshas a conspicuous lack of mathematical language || 23 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#String%20Theory/Quantum%20PhysicsThis article has a conspicuous lack of mathematical language]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Stringnon theorycausal proven?and axiomatic if not evolved || 2 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#String%20theory%20proven%3Fnon causal and axiomatic if not evolved]]
 
|-
| ExternalIs linksit modifieda theory? || 14 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#External%20links%20modifiedIs it a theory?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Kraussproof quoteof string theory or multidimensional universe? || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Krauss%20quoteproof of string theory or multidimensional universe?]]
 
|-
| PhenomenologyExtra Dimensions || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#PhenomenologyExtra Dimensions]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| nonTHERE causalIS andA axiomaticPHYSICAL ifFOUNDATION notFOR evolvedSTRING THEORY || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#non%20causal%20and%20axiomatic%20if%20not%20evolvedTHERE IS A PHYSICAL FOUNDATION FOR STRING THEORY]]
 
|-
| ThisSource article84 hasversus a conspicuous lack of mathematical languageclaim || 31 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#This%20article%20has%20a%20conspicuous%20lack%20of%20mathematical%20languageSource 84 versus claim]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| IsSemi-protected itedit arequest theory?on 2 September 2018 || 42 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Is%20it%20a%20theory%3FSemi-protected edit request on 2 September 2018]]
 
|-
| proofMove ofto stringquantum theory or multidimensional universe?strings || 15 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#proof%20of%20string%20theory%20or%20multidimensional%20universe%3FMove to quantum strings]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Superstring Theory 10-Dimensions and Supergravity Theory 11-DimensionsIntro || 34 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Superstring%20Theory%2010-Dimensions%20and%20Supergravity%20Theory%2011-DimensionsIntro]]
 
|-
| Extra Dimensions: 6D or 7D hyperspace + common 4D &#61; 10/11D spacetime || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Extra%20Dimensions Dimensions: 6D or 7D hyperspace + common 4D &#61; 10/11D spacetime]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| THEREMichio IS A PHYSICAL FOUNDATION FOR STRING THEORYKaku || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#THERE%20IS%20A%20PHYSICAL%20FOUNDATION%20FOR%20STRING%20THEORYMichio Kaku]]
 
|-
| SourceInvitation 84to versussubmit claimto the WikiJournal of Science || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Source%2084%20versus%20claimInvitation to submit to the WikiJournal of Science]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Semi-protected edit request on 215 SeptemberFebruary 20182019 || 2 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Semi-protected%20edit%20request%20on%202%20September%202018 edit request on 15 February 2019]]
 
|-
| ExtraSemi-protected Dimensions:edit 6Drequest oron 7D29 hyperspaceMarch + common 4D = 10/11D spacetime2019 || 14 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Extra%20Dimensions%3A%206D%20or%207D%20hyperspace%20%2B%20common%204D%20%3D%2010/11D%20spacetimeSemi-protected edit request on 29 March 2019]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| IntroPopularization || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#IntroPopularization]]
 
|-
| MichioString Theory is not a Scientific Theory with regards to KakuPopper || 29 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Michio%20KakuString Theory is not a Scientific Theory with regards to Popper]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Semi-protected&#34;Yarn edittheory&#34; requestlisted onat 15Redirects Februaryfor 2019discussion || 21 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Semi-protected%20edit%20request%20on%2015%20February%202019&#34;Yarn theory&#34; listed at Redirects for discussion]]
 
|-
| Semi-protectedGrammar edit request on 29 March 2019Error || 41 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Semi-protected%20edit%20request%20on%2029%20March%202019Grammar Error]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| PopularizationExperimental Evidence and Falsifiability Criterion || 12 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#PopularizationExperimental Evidence and Falsifiability Criterion]]
 
|-
| Witten || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Witten]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Brevity and clarity || 2 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Brevity and clarity]]
 
|-
| Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2022 || 2 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2022]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Semi-protected edit request on 10 May 2022 || 3 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Semi-protected edit request on 10 May 2022]]
 
|-
| First and Second Revolution? What was overthrown? Who was anointed to coin these exaggerations? || 3 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#First and Second Revolution? What was overthrown? Who was anointed to coin these exaggerations?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Title should be &#34;String hypothesis&#34; || 5 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Title should be &#34;String hypothesis&#34;]]
 
|-
| Any connection to matter waves? || 2 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Any connection to matter waves?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Dead Link || 2 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Dead Link]]
 
|-
| This article unrealistically hides string theory weakness || 4 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#This article unrealistically hides string theory weakness]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| add mention of criticism to summary paragraph || 1 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#add mention of criticism to summary paragraph]]
 
|-
| MoveWhy tomust [[quantumeverything strings]]be particle-based? || 57 || [[Talk:String theory/Archive 6#Move%20to%20quantum%20stringsWhy must everything be particle-based?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ExplanationsDyson&#39;s view of String Theory. || 08 || [[Talk:String theory#ExplanationsDyson&#39;s view of String Theory.]]
 
|-
| Overview section is pop-science, not encyclopedic. || 2 || [[Talk:String theory#Overview section is pop-science, not encyclopedic.]]
| Superstring's 6D hyperspace + 4 common dimensions = 10D spacetime or Supergravity & M-theorys' 7D hs + 4D = 11D st || 2 || [[Talk:String theory#Superstring%27s%206D%20hyperspace%20%2B%204%20common%20dimensions%20%3D%2010D%20spacetime%20or%20Supergravity%20%26%20M-theorys%27%207D%20hs%20%2B%204D%20%3D%2011D%20st]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Stringa Theorystring iswill notlook ajust Scientificlike Theoryan withordinary regards to Popperparticle || 95 || [[Talk:String theory#String%20Theory%20is%20not%20a%20Scientific%20Theory%20with%20regards%20to%20Poppera string will look just like an ordinary particle]]
 
|-
| Examples of Realistic Physics could be added to Particle Physics Section? || 3 || [[Talk:String theory#Examples of Realistic Physics could be added to Particle Physics Section?]]
| "Yarn theory" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] || 1 || [[Talk:String theory#%22Yarn%20theory%22%20listed%20at%20Redirects%20for%20discussion]]
 
|}
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:String_theory/Archive_index"