Unary coding: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
flagging term "optimally efficient" as something that needs explanation and citation.
shorten wording on thermometer code.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Entropy encoding}}
'''Unary coding''',<ref group="nb" name="NB1"/> or the [[unary numeral system]], is an [[entropy encoding]] that represents a [[natural number]], ''n'', with ''n'' ones followed by a zero (if the term ''natural number'' is understood as ''non-negative integer'') or with ''n''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;1 ones followed by a zero (if the term ''natural number'' is understood as ''strictly positive integer''). A unary number's code length would thus be ''n''&nbsp;+&nbsp;1 with that first definition, or ''n'' with that second definition. A unary code is sometimes called a '''thermometer code''', because a unaryUnary code writtenwhen verticallyvertical behaves like mercury in a [[thermometer]] that gets taller or shorter as ''n'' gets bigger or smaller, and so is sometimes called '''thermometer code'''.<ref>{{Cite web |title=University of Alberta Dictionary of Cognitive Science: Thermometer Code |url=http://www.bcp.psych.ualberta.ca/~mike/Pearl_Street/Dictionary/contents/T/thermcode.html |access-date=2025-05-31 |website=www.bcp.psych.ualberta.ca}}</ref> An alternative representation uses ''n'' or ''n''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;1 zeros followed by a one, effectively swapping the ones and zeros, [[without loss of generality]]. For example, the first ten unary codes are:
{| class="wikitable"
! Unary code !! Alternative
Line 144:
 
==Symmetric unary codes==
FollowingThe setfollowing ofsymmetric unary codes are symmetric and can be read in any direction. It is alsoand instantaneously decodabledecoded in either direction.:
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
! n (strictly positive) !! Unary code
!Alternative
!n (non-negative)
!n (strictly positive)
|-
| 1 || 1
|0
|0
|1
|-
| 2 || 00
|11
|1
|2
|-
| 3 || 010
|101
|2
|3
|-
| 4 || 0110
|1001
|3
|4
|-
| 5 || 01110
|10001
|4
|5
|-
| 6 || 011110
|100001
|5
|6
|-
| 7 || 0111110
|1000001
|6
|7
|-
| 8 || 01111110
|10000001
|7
|8
|-
| 9 || 011111110
|100000001
|8
|9
|-
| 10 || 0111111110
|1000000001
|9
|10
|-
| colspan="4" | ...
|}
 
== Canonical unary codes ==
{{See also|Canonical Huffman code}}
For unary values where the maximum is known, one can use canonical unary codes that are of a somewhat numerical nature and different from character based codes. It involves starting with numerical '0' or '-1' ( <math>\operatorname2^{n} - 1\,</math>) and the maximum number of digits then for each step reducing the number of digits by one and increasing/decreasing the result by numerical '1'.
For unary values where the maximum is known, one can use canonical unary codes that are of a somewhat numerical nature and different from character based codes. The largest ''n'' numerical '0' or '-1' ( <math>\operatorname2^{n} - 1\,</math>) and the maximum number of digits then for each step reducing the number of digits by one and increasing/decreasing the result by numerical '1'.{{Clarify|date=May 2025|reason=(1) Poor grammar. (2) Are canonical codes only for the positive natural number convention? (3) Shouldn't this say that we are starting with the largest n for this 0 or 2^(n-1) code? (4) Why use red to write the final code (in this example corresponding to n=10)? Does it belong or not belong to the canonical format? (6) Why is there an extra row after the n=10 row? (Shouldn't we delete that empty row to indicate that there are no more codes after the maximum?) (7) Is the maximum code corresponding to n=10 or n=9, which this table both uses 9 digits to express. (We should delete this n=10 row if is beyond the maximum...the algorithm part about "reducing the number of digits by one" would only make sense if 9 is the maximum.)}}
{| class="wikitable"
! n !! Unary code
Line 231 ⟶ 243:
| colspan="3" |
|}
Canonical codes can [http://www.cs.ucf.edu/courses/cap5015/Huff.pdf require less processing time to decode]{{Clarification|reason=Citation deals with [[Canonical Huffman code]]. Is the statement relevant only for when dealing with [[Huffman encoding]], or is this a general statement about Canonical unary code?|date=May 2025}} when they are processed as numbers not a string. If the number of codes required per symbol length is different to 1, i.e. there are more non-unary codes of some length required, those would be achieved by increasing/decreasing the values numerically without reducing the length in that case.
 
==Generalized unary coding==