Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Old AfD multi| date = 17 June 2013 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = Go! (programming_language) (2nd_nomination) }}
{{
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=C |1=
▲{{oldafdfull | date = Nov 12 2009 | result = Keep | page = Go! (programming language) }}
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Low |science=yes |science-importance=Low |software=yes |software-importance=Low |free-software=yes |free-software-importance=Low}}
}}
== Book ==
Line 177 ⟶ 179:
::I forgot to say: "thanks Google!" The corps will make a heroic figure ("villain" hero for one of the conflict sides) in its mortal combat where it will demise in the battle of all proprietary forces it has challenged. It will be a beautiful spectacle for all neutral onlookers (like me), who will compose poems and songs of the grand battle. May their souls be blessed in eternity, ... '''sob'''... (I'm becoming a little emotional here) ... and eternal bliss be in the afterlife... ... said: [[User:Rursus|Rursus]] ([[User talk:Rursus|'''<span style="color: #CC0044; background: #CCFF88"><sup>m</sup><u>bork³</u></span>''']]) 14:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
== Does anyone use this language? ==
Certainly the level of detail in the article is far in excess of that for substantially more developed and utilized languages.
If this language merits any discussion of its details at all, then we should at least provide a link to the page of the active Go! developers community, where people can go to find out more.
If none exists, we should greatly attenuate the page: tell people what it was, that it was known primarily for a naming controversy, and that its download page is no longer active. That's a single paragraph. [[Special:Contributions/2620:0:1003:1005:D267:E5FF:FEEC:D1C0|2620:0:1003:1005:D267:E5FF:FEEC:D1C0]] ([[User talk:2620:0:1003:1005:D267:E5FF:FEEC:D1C0|talk]]) 22:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
:The language should just be briefly mentioned on the Go page and nothing more. 100% of the article sources are either primary sources or related to the naming controversy. There is no Go! developer community, this is pretty much a dead language with zero notability. [[User:WikiLaurent|Laurent]] ([[User talk:WikiLaurent|talk]]) 16:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
== source tag edit-war ==
[[user:Yobot]], [[user:Bgwhite]] and now also [[user:Magioladitis]] are repeatedly adding <nowiki><source></nowiki>. Could you please explain why you are doing this? Doing so breaks the formatting of this article. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 00:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
: {{U|John Vandenberg}} I've stated why. Again, you keep treating people as idiots. You call me names and want to block me. How many times do I have to say to not to contact me. GET THE HELL AWAY FROM ME!!!! WHAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND ABOUT THAT!!!! Go bully somebody else to make you feel important. [[User:Bgwhite|Bgwhite]] ([[User talk:Bgwhite|talk]]) 01:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
:: Sigh. Where have I called you names or threatened to block you? I am guessing that you are referring to [[User_talk:Bgwhite#Go!]], where you did not answer this question, at least not correctly. A lang=foo is needed, and afaik this language has never been supported by the source highlighter. Since the switch to pygments, it is now an error condition to not specify a language. I am still struggling to understand why so many administrators are participating in an edit war, and each time an administrator edits this page they make it render incorrectly. I see [[user:Hydriz]]'s edits also had the same effect, by using <nowiki><pre></nowiki>. I must be missing something that is bringing so many people to 'fix' this obscure article. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 01:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
The problem is that things this is source code with comments. I have not noticed this before. Using code as plain text has the effect that some things like <code>{}}</code> catch attention as broken template or something. -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 05:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
:You have not noticed the leading space syntax before? What tool is detecting this page as having a broken template? <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 05:18, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
* (time goes by)... I've marked it up as syntax. The footnotes are adequately addressed outside of the code block. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox|talk]]</span> 01:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
== Removing sentence about not supporting inheritance ==
In the Design section, there's a sentence "As a deliberate design choice to reduce complexity, Go! does not support inheritance." which lacks a citation. I think it may have been mistakenly added to this page as a result of confusing it for that of [[Go (programming language)]], as it is a true statement about that language (and omitted the ! [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Go!_(programming_language)&diff=423342228&oldid=423341343 when it was originally added|]). "Ontology Oriented Programming in Go!" from the references/further reading seems to suggest that Go! does in fact support inheritance, saying things such as "Sub-class relationships are reflected using both type and theory inheritance rules.", "We may define a new class as a modification/extension of an existing class using inheritance.", and "In both Go! and Owl a class may inherit from more than one superclass." I've tentatively removed that sentence from the article. --[[User:Surinna|Surinna]] ([[User talk:Surinna|talk]]) 03:12, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
== External links modified ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on [[Go! (programming language)]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=759842700 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091115151833/http://www.informatica.si:80/vol30.htm to http://www.informatica.si/vol30.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 12:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
== Gender is not binary! ==
Gender variable should be called "sex" if it's trying to determine XX XY birth chromosome sort of stuff. Maybe then Gender can be a string [[User:Edjez|Edjez]] ([[User talk:Edjez|talk]]) 22:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
| |||