Content deleted Content added
→Removing sentence about not supporting inheritance: new section |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Old AfD multi| date = 17 June 2013 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = Go! (programming_language) (2nd_nomination) }}
{{Old AfD multi| date = Nov 12 2009 | result = Keep | page = Go! (programming language) }}
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Low |science=yes |science-importance=Low |software=yes |software-importance=Low |free-software=yes |free-software-importance=Low}}
}}
== Book ==
Line 196 ⟶ 197:
The problem is that things this is source code with comments. I have not noticed this before. Using code as plain text has the effect that some things like <code>{}}</code> catch attention as broken template or something. -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 05:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
:You have not noticed the leading space syntax before? What tool is detecting this page as having a broken template? <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 05:18, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
* (time goes by)... I've marked it up as syntax. The footnotes are adequately addressed outside of the code block. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox|talk]]</span> 01:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
== Removing sentence about not supporting inheritance ==
In the Design section, there's a sentence "As a deliberate design choice to reduce complexity, Go! does not support inheritance." which lacks a citation. I think it may have been mistakenly added to this page as a result of confusing it for that of [[Go (programming language)]], as it is a true statement about that language (and omitted the ! [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Go!_(programming_language)&diff=423342228&oldid=423341343 when it was originally added|]). "Ontology Oriented Programming in Go!" from the references/further reading seems to suggest that Go! does in fact support inheritance, saying things such as "Sub-class relationships are reflected using both type and theory inheritance rules.", "We may define a new class as a modification/extension of an existing class using inheritance.", and "In both Go! and Owl a class may inherit from more than one superclass." I've tentatively removed that sentence from the article. --[[User:Surinna|Surinna]] ([[User talk:Surinna|talk]]) 03:12, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
== External links modified ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on [[Go! (programming language)]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=759842700 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091115151833/http://www.informatica.si:80/vol30.htm to http://www.informatica.si/vol30.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 12:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
== Gender is not binary! ==
Gender variable should be called "sex" if it's trying to determine XX XY birth chromosome sort of stuff. Maybe then Gender can be a string [[User:Edjez|Edjez]] ([[User talk:Edjez|talk]]) 22:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
| |||