Content deleted Content added
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) |
m →Factors potentially affecting test results: fixed capitalization |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
[[File:
The '''container compression test''' measures the [[compressive strength]] of packages such as boxes, drums, and cans.
It is commonly used to evaluate [[shipping container]]s made of [[corrugated fiberboard]] as well as [[wooden box]]es and [[crate]]s.
{{cite journal
| last =Varzinskas | first =Visvadas
Line 13 ⟶ 14:
| volume =50 | issue =4 | pages =57–65
| url = http://www.matsc.ktu.lt/index.php/erem/article/viewArticle/42
}}</ref> etc.
|
| last2 =Lee |first2=S. K
| last3 =Johnson |first3=C. G.
Line 25 ⟶ 26:
}}</ref>
It is usually a laboratory test involving a special machine, a compression tester, to apply controlled compression on a test [[Laboratory specimen|specimen]].
▲[[File:Army.mil-2007-02-07-153623.jpg|thumb|150 px|Compression test for steel drum]]
==Test procedures==
A common method of conducting the test, as described in several published standard [[test method]]s, is to compress a box at a constant rate of {{convert|1/2
The results of the constant rate of compression test can be:
Line 38 ⟶ 37:
* The ability of a container to protect the contents from compression damage
* etc.
The dynamic loads have some relationship with expected field loads.:<ref>{{cite journal |last=Burgess |first=G|author2=Singh, Srinagyam |date=July 2005 |title=Predicting Collapse Times for Corrugated Boxes Under Top Load|journal=Journal of Testing and Evaluation |volume=33 |issue=4
A test can also be conducted with platens that are not mechanically driven but are free to move with a fixed mass (or fixed force) loaded upon them.<ref>ASTM D4577, Standard Test Method for Compression Resistance of a container Under Constant Load</ref> The results of static load testing can be:
* The time to failure
* The time to a critical deformation
Line 49 ⟶ 48:
==Corrugated box testing==
Corrugated shipping containers are exposed to compression hazards during storage and shipment.
===Factors potentially affecting test results===
* Size and construction of the specific shipping container under test<ref>{{Citation
| last =de la Fuente*
| first =Javier
| title = Investigation of Compression Strength of Bliss Style Corrugated Fiberboard Boxes
| journal = Journal of Applied Packaging Research
| volume =10
| issue =4▼
| pages = 45-64
| year =2011
| url = https://repository.rit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1140&&context=japr&&sei-redir=1&referer=https%253A%252F%252Fscholar.google.com%252Fscholar%253Fstart%253D20%2526q%253Dcorrugated%252Bbox%252Bprototyping%252Bsoftware%2526hl%253Den%2526as_sdt%253D0%252C24#search=%22corrugated%20box%20prototyping%20software%22
| access-date = 12 October 2024}}</ref>
* Grade and flute structure of [[corrugated fiberboard]]
* [[
* Orientation of the box during the test
* Inner supports, if used during testing (wood, corrugated board, cushioning)
Line 63 ⟶ 72:
| title = Box and Closure: Partners in Performance
| journal = Journal of Packaging Technology
| volume = 2 | issue = 4
}}</ref>
* Whether the compression machine has "fixed" or "floating" (swiveled) platens.
* Previous handling or testing of box<ref>{{cite journal |last=Singh |first=S. P.|author2=Pratheepthinthong |date=July 2000 |title=Loss of Compression Strength in Corrugated Shipping Containers Shipped in the Single Parcel Environment|journal=Journal of Testing and Evaluation|volume=28 |issue=4
*Vent and [[package handle|hand holes]]<ref>{{Citation
| last =Fadiji
| first =T
| title =The Role of Horticultural Package Vent Hole Design on Structural Performance
| journal =
| volume =14
▲ | issue =
| pages =194–201
| date =2018
| url =https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/58363337/AZOJETE-CIGR_19_194-201.pdf?1549687286=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DTHE_ROLE_OF_HORTICULTURAL_PACKAGE_VENT_H.pdf&Expires=1600537321&Signature=aikwpcP68LIvJexSUqyf9mWiLUgLdMWQxSEB4MPixHGmQ5sXUdLWEXVfmfKgZl62LxdAbjCnfVoXtsv5elZYS-sVEPye7hIYaAP2ttOw6-qW94zNegP1qXmsjI0Hb3iirvcz7O2dsHAscnDHusoV5-Xzy-XCM17xOjLf7c5qx2dwQauDYrEZm4CoQuFoxvmTRfT55tf0CrIIRcC~w8EmX9zY9B4OgFT1CDIlj9RSdSXsclVUqLkfCxhBT0b37oN0qypBzbQzPVN7xHVzg3LoIEl0-Lc8ukr-0sEmL-vis-zDbPW2Pv3OTKDSqIUnGBv375Xxl9LdAw1icwwa7rFpHQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
|
| last =Singh
| first =J
Line 91 ⟶ 99:
===Estimations===
Corrugated fiberboard can be evaluated by many material test methods including an [[Edge crush test|Edge Crush Test]] (ECT). There have been efforts to estimate the peak compression strength of a box (usually empty, regular singelwall slotted containers, top-to-bottom) based on various board properties.
===Calculating compression requirement===
Line 103 ⟶ 111:
==Dynamic compression==
Containers can be subjected to compression forces that involve distribution dynamics.
==See also==
Line 119 ⟶ 127:
*[[ASTM]] Standard D7030 Test Method for Short Term Creep Performance of Corrugated Fiberboard Containers Under Constant Load Using a Compression Test Machine
*German Standard [[Deutsches Institut für Normung|DIN]] 55440-1 Packaging Test; compression test; test with a constant conveyance-speed
*[[International Organization for Standardization|ISO]] 12048
==Further reading==
Line 132 ⟶ 140:
{{packaging}}
[[Category:Paper products]]
[[Category:Packaging materials]]
|