Content deleted Content added
→External links: +nav |
|||
| (39 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|File standard used by the United States Congress Library}}
{{Infobox computing standard
| title = Metadata Object Description Schema
| image =
| | caption = MODS Logo
| status = Published
| year_started = 2002
| version = 3.8
| versionDate = September 2022
| preview =
| previewDate =
| organization =
| base_standards =
| related_standards = [[MARC standards|MARC]]
| abbreviation = MODS
| ___domain = [[Bibliography]]
| license =
| website = {{URL|https://www.loc.gov/standards/mods}}
}}
The '''Metadata Object Description Schema''' ('''MODS''') is an [[Extensible Markup Language|XML]]-based bibliographic description schema developed by the [[United States]] [[Library of Congress]]' Network Development and Standards Office. MODS was designed as a compromise between the complexity of the [[MARC standards|MARC]] format used by libraries and the extreme simplicity of [[Dublin Core]] metadata.
== About MODS ==
Line 14 ⟶ 26:
===History and development===
The Library of Congress' Network Development and MARC Standards Office, with interested experts, developed the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) in 2002 for a bibliographic element set that may be used for a variety of purposes, and particularly for library applications. As an XML schema it is intended to be able to carry selected data from existing MARC 21 records as well as to enable the creation of original resource description records. It includes a subset of MARC fields and uses language-based tags rather than numeric ones, in some cases regrouping elements from the MARC 21 bibliographic format. MODS was first announced for trial use in June 2002. Since September 16, 2022 it is at version 3.8.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-3-8-announcement.html |title= MODS 3.8 Schema Released |website= [[Library of Congress]] |accessdate=2023-06-06}}</ref>
The number of users of MODS is unknown. Implementers are encouraged to register their uses of MODS in the [
=== Relationship to MARC ===
The MODS record has been designed to carry key data elements from the [[MARC standards|MARC]] record but does not define all of the MARC fields and does not use the field and subfield tagging from the MARC standard. There are data elements in MODS that are not compatible with the MARC record so there is some loss translating from MARC to MODS and from MODS to MARC. There is no commitment on the part of the
The Library of Congress maintains crosswalks in XSLT format for mapping from MARC to MODS, and from MODS to MARC.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-conversions.html |title= Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) Conversions |website= [[Library of Congress]] |accessdate=2022-03-18}}</ref>
=== Relationship to Dublin Core and qualified Dublin Core ===
Dublin Core is a simple schema. MODS is far more complex.
The Library of Congress maintains crosswalks in XSLT format for mapping from Dublin Core to MODS, and from MODS to Dublin Core.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-conversions.html |title= Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) Conversions |website= [[Library of Congress]] |accessdate=2022-03-18}}</ref> However, no crosswalks are available for mapping between qualified Dublin Core and MODS.
=== Advantages ===
The use of MODS provides several advantages compared to other metadata schemas:<ref>{{cite web|last1=Gueguen|first1=Gretchen|title=MODS and MADS: current implementations and future directions|url=http://litablog.org/2010/07/mods-and-mads-current-implementations-and-future-directions/|website=LITA Blog|publisher=Library and Information Technology Association|accessdate=25 August 2014|date=2 July 2010|quote=MODS advantages: compatibility with what they already have less detail than MARC so you can map MARC other standards are easy to map to MODS as well (easier than MARC at least)}}</ref>
* High compatibility with existing resource descriptions
* Less detail than MARC so various internal record element sets can be mapped to MODS
* Item descriptions from outside in DC and other simpler formats can be mapped and enhanced
=== Maintenance board ===
Revisions to the schema are suggested and discussed on the [https://web.archive.org/web/20230507165941/https://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?A0=MODS MODS listserv], and approved by the MODS Editorial Committee. The MODS/MADS Editorial Committee is an international group of volunteers responsible for maintaining editorial control over MODS and MADS and their accompanying documentation as well as for the MODS and MADS XML schemas.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/editorial-committee.html |title= MODS/MADS Editorial Committee |website= [[Library of Congress]] |accessdate=2011-08-02}}</ref> The Library of Congress carries out the application of approved changes to the schema and maintains the official web site for the standard. There is no formal standards body involved in the MODS schema at this time.
==See also==
* [[Comparison of reference management software]] for software supporting the MODS format
* [[Metadata Authority Description Schema]] (MADS) created to serve as a companion to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS). MADS describes authorities (as in authority control), meaning people, organizations, geographical ___location etc. involved in creating, publishing, or contributing to creative works and publications. MODS describes individual items.
* [[Metadata standards]]
== References ==
==External links==
* {{Official website|https://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/}}
{{Semantic Web}}
| |||