Wikipedia:But I'm an administrator!: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:09, 19 April 2017

Latest revision as of 21:23, 14 June 2025

(30 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{deletion essay|WP:SENIORITY|WP:PULLRANK|WP:BIAA}}

{{nutshell|This page is an essay encouraging editors to not necessarilyDon't give greater weight in discussions just because one user is a Wikipedia Administratoradministrator or otherwise may have more "seniority" than another.}}

[[File:King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra - Wedding -1863.jpg|thumb|right|upright|alt=Black-and-white photograph of King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra|On Wikipedia, no editors are given [[tiaras]] or fancy ceremonial [[tassels]]. Not editors with tens or hundreds of thousands of edits. Not even administrators.]]

Sometimes in [[WP:AFD|articles for deletion]] discussions, one editor's argument may be given more weight over another simply because one has more edits on Wikipedia or one may even be a Wikipedia Administrator. Don't fall for it.

Sometimes in [[WP:AFD|articlesdiscussions foron deletion]] discussionsWikipedia, one editor's argument may be given more weight over another simply because one has more edits on Wikipedia or one may even be a Wikipedia Administratoradministrator. Don't fall for it.

At the time this essay was created, the original author [[User:Paulmcdonald]] submitted this:

At the time this essay was created, the original author [[User:Paulmcdonald|Paulmcdonald]] submitted this:

<blockquote>

{{Quote|

''I have over 35,000 edits recorded on Wikipedia. According to [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits]], I am ranked 1,927 in terms of most edits among all registered Wikipedians. I'm not "number 1" but I've done a lot. And I'm wrong a lot.--[[User:Paulmcdonald|Paul McDonald]] ([[User talk:Paulmcdonald|talk]]) 02:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)''

}}

</blockquote>

Each argument should stand on its own accord and on its own merits in Wikipedia discussions. That means the newest editor, with the fewest edits, may have the best idea or the most relevant point of view. An Don'tanonymous letIP anythingeditor likewho "seniority"just swaybegan yourediting opinionthe project last week may have the best idea.

Don't let anything like "seniority", edit counts, or Wikipedia status of an editor (awards, Barnstars, years of experience) sway your opinion. If the "experienced" editor has knowledge that leads them to hold a certain position in a discussion, they should be able to convey it in an argument that other editors can judge on its own merits.

In other words, provide details for the experience and explain your argument, don't just respond with "Because I'm an admin/top editor, so there."

==See also==

* [[Wikipedia:Equality]]

* [[Wikipedia:Newbies aren't always clueless]]

* [[User:Jimbo Wales/Statement of principles #2]]: "there must be no elites..."

* [[Wikipedia:Ten Year Society]]

* [[Wikipedia:Fifteen Year Society]]

* [[Argument from authority]]

{{Wikipedia essays}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:But I'm an Administrator!}}

[[Category:Wikipedia deletion essays about deletion]]