Content deleted Content added
m Added another further reading source |
|||
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 26:
Whereas standard [[Riemann integral|Riemann integration]] sums a function ''f''(''x'') over a continuous range of values of ''x'', functional integration sums a [[functional (mathematics)|functional]] ''G''[''f''], which can be thought of as a "function of a function" over a continuous range (or space) of functions ''f''. Most functional integrals cannot be evaluated exactly but must be evaluated using [[perturbation methods]]. The formal definition of a functional integral is
<math display="block">
\int G[f]\; \mathcal{D}[f] \equiv \int_{
</math>
However, in most cases the functions ''f''(''x'') can be written in terms of an infinite series of [[orthogonal functions]] such as <math>f(x) = f_n H_n(x)</math>, and then the definition becomes
<math display="block">
\int G[f] \; \mathcal{D}[f] \equiv \int_{
</math>
which is slightly more understandable. The integral is shown to be a functional integral with a capital
==Examples==
Most functional integrals are actually infinite, but
:<math>
\frac{\displaystyle\int \exp\left\lbrace-\frac{1}{2} \
{\displaystyle\int \exp\left\lbrace-\frac{1}{2} \
\exp\left\lbrace\frac{1}{2}\
</math>
in which <math>
By functionally differentiating this with respect to ''J''(''x'') and then setting to 0 this becomes an exponential multiplied by a polynomial in ''f''. For example, setting <math>K(x, y) = \Box\delta^4(x - y)</math>, we find:▼
K(x;y)=K(y;x)
▲</math>. By functionally differentiating this with respect to ''J''(''x'') and then setting to 0 this becomes an exponential multiplied by a
<math>
G[f,J]=-\frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}}\left[\int_{\mathbb{R}} f(x) K(x;y) f(y)\,dy + J(x) f(x)\right]dx\, \quad,\quad W[J]=\int \exp\lbrace G[f,J]\rbrace\mathcal{D}[f]\;.
</math>
With this notation the first equation can be written as:
<math>
\dfrac{W[J]}{W[0]}=\exp\left\lbrace\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^2} J(x) K^{-1}(x;y) J(y) \,dx\,dy\right\rbrace.
</math>
Now, taking functional derivatives to the definition of <math>
W[J]
</math> and then evaluating in <math>
J=0
</math>, one obtains:
<math>
\dfrac{\delta }{\delta J(a)}W[J]\Bigg|_{J=0}=\int f(a)\exp\lbrace G[f,0]\rbrace\mathcal{D}[f]\;,
</math>
<math>
\dfrac{\delta^2 W[J]}{\delta J(a)\delta J(b)}\Bigg|_{J=0}=\int f(a)f(b)\exp\lbrace G[f,0]\rbrace\mathcal{D}[f]\;,
</math>
<math>
\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\vdots
</math>
which is the result anticipated. More over, by using the first equation one arrives to the useful result:
:<math>
\dfrac{\
K^{-1}(a; b)\;;
{\displaystyle\int e^{i \int f(x) \Box f(x) \,d^4x} \mathcal{D}[f]} =▼
</math>
Putting these results together and backing to the original notation we have:
<math>
\frac{\displaystyle\int f(a)f(b)\exp\left\lbrace-\frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}^2} f(x) K(x;y) f(y)\, dx\,dy\right\rbrace \mathcal{D}[f]}
▲ {\displaystyle\int
K^{-1}(a;b)\,.
</math>
:<math>
\int \exp\left\lbrace \
</math>
Line 107 ⟶ 146:
*[[Victor Popov]], Functional Integrals in Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Physics, Springer 1983
*[[Sergio Albeverio]], Sonia Mazzucchi, A unified approach to infinite-dimensional integration, Reviews in Mathematical Physics, 28, 1650005 (2016)
*[[John R. Klauder|Klauder, John]]. "[https://www.phys.ufl.edu/functional-integration/ Lectures on Functional Integration]." ''University of Florida.'' [https://web.archive.org/web/20240708182058/http://www.phys.ufl.edu/functional-integration/ Archived] on July 8th, 2024.
|