Cantor's intersection theorem: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:53, 9 October 2020

Latest revision as of 15:02, 22 June 2025

(23 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{short description|On decreasing nested sequences of non-empty compact sets}}

'''Cantor's intersection theorem''',<ref>{{Cite web |last=Weisstein |first=Eric W. |title=Cantor's Intersection Theorem |url=https://mathworld.wolfram.com/CantorsIntersectionTheorem.html |access-date=2025-06-20 |website=mathworld.wolfram.com |language=en}}</ref> also called '''Cantor's nested intervals theorem''',<ref>{{Cite book |last=Segura |first=Julio |url=https://www.google.com.br/books/edition/An_Eponymous_Dictionary_of_Economics/Z6Oy4L-6LSwC |title=An Eponymous Dictionary of Economics: A Guide to Laws and Theorems Named After Economists |last2=Braun |first2=Carlos Rodríguez |date=2004-01-01 |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |isbn=978-1-84542-360-5 |pages=38 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Denlinger |first=Charles G. |url=https://www.google.com.br/books/edition/Elements_of_Real_Analysis/CeTkVSXlj4cC |title=Elements of Real Analysis |date=2010-05-08 |publisher=Jones & Bartlett Publishers |isbn=978-1-4496-5993-6 |pages=103 |language=en}}</ref> refers to two closely related theorems in [[general topology]] and [[real analysis]], named after [[Georg Cantor]], about intersections of decreasing nested [[sequence]]s of non-empty compact sets.

'''Cantor's intersection theorem''' refers to two closely related theorems in [[general topology]] and [[real analysis]], named after [[Georg Cantor]], about intersections of decreasing nested [[sequence|sequences]] of non-empty compact sets.

==Topological Statementstatement==

'''Theorem.''' ''Let <math> S </math> be a [[Topological Space|topological space]]. A decreasing nested sequence of non-empty compact, closed subsets of <math>S</math> has a non-empty intersection. In other words, supposing <math>(C_k)_{k \geq 0}</math> is a sequence of non-empty compact, closed subsets of S satisfying''

:<math>C_0 \supset C_1 \supset \cdots \supset C_n \supset C_{n+1} \supset \cdots, </math>

''it follows that''

:<math>\left(\bigcap_{k = 0}^\infty C_k\right) \neq \emptyset. </math>

The closedness condition may be omitted in situations where every compact subset of ''<math>S''</math> is closed, for example when ''<math>S''</math> is [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]].

'''Proof.''' Assume, by way of contradiction, that <math>{\bigcaptextstyle \bigcap_{k = 0}^\infty C_k}=\emptyset</math>. For each ''<math>k''</math>, let <math>U_k=C_0\setminus C_k</math>. Since <math>{\bigcuptextstyle \bigcup_{k = 0}^\infty U_k}=C_0\setminus {\left(textstyle \bigcapbigcap_{k C_k= 0}^\right)infty C_k}</math> and <math>{\bigcaptextstyle \bigcap_{k = 0}^\infty C_k}=\emptyset</math>, we have <math>{\bigcuptextstyle \bigcup_{k = 0}^\infty U_k}=C_0</math>. Note that, sinceSince the <math>C_k</math> are closed relative to ''<math>S''</math> and therefore, also closed relative to <math>C_0</math>, the <math>U_k</math>, their set complements in <math>C_0</math>, are open relative to <math>C_0</math>.

Since <math>C_0\subset S</math> is compact and <math>(\{U_k) \vert k \geq 0\}</math> is an open cover (on <math>C_0</math>) of <math>C_0</math>, we can extract a finite cover <math>\{U_{k_1}, U_{k_2}, \ldots, U_{k_m}\}</math> can be extracted. Let <math>M=\max_{1\leq i\leq m} {k_i}</math>. Then <math>{\bigcuptextstyle \bigcup_{i = 1}^m U_{k_i}}=U_M</math> because <math>U_1\subset U_2\subset\cdots\subset U_n\subset U_{n+1}\cdots</math>, by the nesting hypothesis for the collection <math> (C_k)._{k \geq 0}</math>. Consequently, <math>C_0={\bigcuptextstyle \bigcup_{i = 1}^m U_{k_i}} = U_M</math>. But then <math>C_M=C_0\setminus U_M=\emptyset</math>, a contradiction. [[Q.E.D.|∎]]

==Statement for Realreal Numbersnumbers==

The theorem in real analysis draws the same conclusion for [[closed set|closed]] and [[bounded set|bounded]] subsets of the set of [[real number]]s <math>\mathbfmathbb{R}</math>. It states that a decreasing nested sequence <math>(C_k)_{k \geq 0}</math> of non-empty, closed and bounded subsets of <math>\mathbfmathbb{R}</math> has a non-empty intersection.

This version follows from the general topological statement in light of the [[Heine&ndash;Borel theorem]], which states that sets of real numbers are compact if and only if they are closed and bounded. However, it is typically used as a lemma in proving said theorem, and therefore warrants a separate proof.

As an example, if <math>C_k=[0,1/k]</math>, the intersection over <math>(C_k)_{k \geq 0}</math> is&nbsp;<math>\{0\}</math>. On the other hand, both the sequence of open bounded sets <math>C_k=(0,1/k)</math> and the sequence of unbounded closed sets <math>C_k=[k,\infty)</math> have empty intersection. All these sequences are properly nested.

This version of the theorem generalizes to <math>\mathbf{R}^n</math>, the set of ''<math>n''</math>-element vectors of real numbers, but does not generalize to arbitrary [[metric space]]s. For example, in the space of [[rational number]]s, the sets

: <math>C_k = [\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{2}+1/k] = (\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{2}+1/k)</math>

Line 34:

A simple corollary of the theorem is that the [[Cantor set]] is nonempty, since it is defined as the intersection of a decreasing nested sequence of sets, each of which is defined as the union of a finite number of closed intervals; hence each of these sets is non-empty, closed, and bounded. In fact, the Cantor set contains uncountably many points.

'''Theorem.''' ''Let'' <math>(C_k)_{k \geq 0}</math> ''be a familysequence of non-empty, closed, and bounded subsets of'' <math>\mathbfmathbb{R}</math> ''satisfying''

:<math>C_0 \supset C_1 \supset \cdots C_n \supset C_{n+1} \cdots. </math>

Line 40:

''Then,''

:<math>\left(\bigcap_{k = 0}^\infty C_k\right) \neq \emptyset. </math>

:

''Proof.'' Each nonempty, closed, and bounded subset <math>C_k\subset\mathbfmathbb{R}</math> admits a minimal element <math>x_k</math>. Since for each ''<math>k''</math>, we have

:<math>x_{k+1} \in C_{k+1} \subseteqsubset C_k</math>,

it follows that

:<math>x_k \le x_{k+1}</math>,

so <math>(x_k)_{k \geq 0}</math> is an increasing sequence contained in the bounded set <math>C_0</math>. The [[monotone convergence theorem]] for bounded sequences of real numbers now guarantees the existence of a [[Limit of a sequence|limit point]]

:<math>x=\lim_{k\to \infty} x_k.</math>

For fixed ''<math>k''</math>, <math>x_j\in C_k</math> for all <math>j\geq k</math>, and since <math>C_k</math> wasis closed and ''<math>x''</math> is a [[limit point]], it follows that <math>x\in C_k</math>. Our choice of ''<math>k''</math> wasis arbitrary, hence ''<math>x''</math> belongs to ''<math>{\textstyle \bigcap_{k = 0}^\bigcap_kinfty C_k}</math>'' and the proof is complete. ∎

== Variant in complete metric spaces ==

In a [[complete metric space]], the following variant of Cantor's intersection theorem holds.

'''Theorem.''' ''Suppose that <math>X</math> is a complete metric space, and <math>(C_k)_{k \geq 1}</math> is a sequence'' ''of non-empty closed nested subsets of <math>X</math> whose [[diameter]]s tend to zero:''

:<math>\lim_{k\to\infty} \operatorname{diam}(C_k) = 0,</math>

Line 64:

''where <math>\operatorname{diam}(C_k)</math> is defined by''

:<math>\operatorname{diam}(C_k) = \sup\{d(x,y) |\mid x,y\in C_k\}.</math>

''Then the intersection of the'' ''<math>C_k</math> contains exactly one point:''

:<math>\bigcap_{k=1}^\infty C_k = \{x\}</math>

''for some <math>x \in X</math>.''

''Proof (sketch).'' A proof goes as follows. Since the diameters tend to zero, the diameter of the intersection of the ''<math>C_k</math>'' is zero, so it is either empty or consists of a single point. So it is sufficient to show that it is not empty. Pick an element <math>x_k\in C_k</math> for each ''<math>k''</math>. Since the diameter of ''<math>C_k</math>'' tends to zero and the ''<math>C_k</math>'' are nested, the ''<math>x_k</math>'' form a Cauchy sequence. Since the metric space is complete this Cauchy sequence converges to some point ''<math>x''</math>. Since each ''<math>C_k</math>'' is closed, and ''<math>x''</math> is a limit of a sequence in ''<math>C_k</math>'', ''<math>x''</math> must lie in ''<math>C_k</math>''. This is true for every ''<math>k''</math>, and therefore the intersection of the ''<math>C_k</math>'' must contain ''<math>x''</math>. ∎

A converse to this theorem is also true: if ''<math>X''</math> is a metric space with the property that the intersection of any nested family of non-empty closed subsets whose diameters tend to zero is non-empty, then ''<math>X''</math> is a complete metric space. (To prove this, let ''<math>(x_k)_{k \geq 1}</math>'' be a Cauchy sequence in ''<math>X''</math>, and let ''<math>C_k</math>'' be the closure of the tail <math>(x_j)_{j \geq k}</math> of this sequence.)

== See also ==

* [[Kuratowski's intersection theorem]]

* [[Helly's theorem]] - another theorem on intersection of sets.

== References ==

{{Reflist}}

* {{MathWorld | urlname=CantorsIntersectionTheorem | title=Cantor's Intersection Theorem}}

* Jonathan Lewin. An interactive introduction to mathematical analysis. Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|0-521-01718-1}}. Section 7.8.