Core–periphery structure: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:47, 27 September 2019

Latest revision as of 21:43, 27 June 2025

(14 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Network theory model}}

{{Multiple issues|{{citation style|date=March 2018}}

{{For|the language theory|Center versus periphery}}

{{Multiple issues|

{{Multiple issues|{{citation style|date=March 2018}}

{{technical|date=July 2015}}

{{Underlinked|date=July 2015}}{{lead rewrite|date=October 2018}}

}}

[[File:Core-Periphery Network.png|thumb|A Network with an idealized core–periphery structure]]

'''Core periphery structure''' is based on [[Immanuel Wallerstein|Immanuel Wallerstein's]] [[world-systems theory]].{{citation needed|date=February 2019}} He formulated the chart in the 1980s.{{Clarify|date=August 2019}}

[[File:Core-Periphery Network.png|thumb|A Network with an idealized core–periphery structure]]

'''Core–periphery structure''' is a [[network theory]] model.

==Models of core–periphery structures==

Line 15 ⟶ 19:

===Continuous model===

This model allows for the existence of three or more partitions of node classes. However, including more classes makes modifications to the discrete model more difficult.{{needs clarificationclarify|date=August 2019}} Borgatti & Everett (1999) suggest that, in order to overcome this problem, each node be assigned a measure of ‘coreness’ that will determine its class. Nevertheless, the threshold of what constitutes a high ‘coreness’ value must be justified theoretically.

==Discussion==

Hubs are commonly found in [[empirical networks]] and pose a problem for community detection as they usually have strong ties to many communities. Identifying core–periphery structures can help circumvent this problem by categorizing hubs as part of the network's core (Rombach et al., 2014, p. 160). Likewise, though all core nodes have high centrality measures, not all nodes with high centrality measures belong to the core. It is possible to find that a set of highly central nodes in a graph does not make an internally cohesive subgraph (Borgatti & Everett, 2000)...

==Uses in economics==

The concept ofwas centerfirst andintroduced peripheryinto waseconomics firstas introduced"centre-periphery" by [[Raúl Prebisch]] in the 1950s. However, but the qualitativeorigin notionof thatthe socialidea networkscould canultimately havebe atraced core–peripheryback structureto has[[Johann aHeinrich longvon historyThünen|Thünen]]'s in''Isolated disciplinesState'' such(1826).<ref>{{Cite asjournal sociology,|last1=Rama international|first1=J. relations|last2=Hall (Nemeth|first2=J. &|year=2021 Smith,|title=Raúl 1985),Prebisch and economicsthe (Snyderevolving &uses Kick,of 1979).'centre-periphery'in economic analysis |journal=Review of Evolutionary Political Economy |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=315–332}}</ref> Observed trade flows and diplomatic ties among countries fit this structure. [[Paul Krugman]] (1991) suggests that when transportation costs are low enough manufacturers concentrate in a single region known as the core and other regions (the periphery) limit themselves to the supply of agricultural goods.

==See also==

*[[World-systems theory]]

*[[Core countries]]

*[[Semi-periphery countries]]

Line 31 ⟶ 36:

==References==

{{reflist}}

* [[Stephen Borgatti|Borgatti, S. P.]], & Everett, M. G. (1999). Models of core /periphery structures. Social Networks, 21, 375–395. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2

* Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1999). Models of core /periphery structures. Social Networks, 21, 375–395. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2

* Krugman, P.R. (1991), Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy 99, 483–499.

* Nemeth, R. J., & Smith, D. A. (1985). International trade and world-system structure: A multiple network analysis (No. 8).