Boxing (computer programming): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
copy editing to more directly summarize the rest of the article, and removing a citation needed tag (citations are not needed in the summary/lead MOS:LEADCITE)
Alternate name
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Programming language concept}}
{{See also|Object (computer science)}}
{{redirect|Object type|another use|Class (computer programming)|the universal type|any type}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{More citations needed|date=August 2009}}
In [[computer science]], '''boxing''' (a.k.a. wrapping) is the transformation of placing a primitive type within an [[Object (computer science)|object]] so that the value can be used as a [[reference type|reference]]. '''Unboxing''' is the reverse transformation of extracting the primitive value from its wrapper object. '''Autoboxing''' is the term for automatically applying boxing and/or unboxing transformations as needed.
{{Generalize|date=October 2009}}
}}
<!-- only talks of Java; there are complaints on the talk page about this -->
 
==Boxing==
In [[computer science]], an '''object type''' (a.k.a. '''wrapping object''') is a [[datatype]] that is used in [[object-oriented programming]] to [[wrapper pattern|wrap]] a non-object type to use it more like a [[reference type|dynamic]] [[object (computer science)|object]].
 
SomeBoxing's most prominent use is in [[object-orientedJava (programming language)|Java]]s makewhere there is a distinction between [[reference type|reference]] and [[value type]]s, oftenfor referredreasons tosuch as objectsruntime efficiency and non-objectssyntax onand platformssemantic whereissues. complexIn valueJava, typesa don't{{Java|LinkedList}} exist,can foronly reasonsstore suchvalues asof runtimetype efficiency{{Java|Object}}. andOne syntaxmight ordesire semanticto issues.have Fora example, [[{{Java|LinkedList}} (programmingof language){{Java|int}}, but this is not directly possible. Instead Java]] hasdefines [[primitive wrapper class]]es corresponding to each [[primitive data type|primitive type]]: {{Java|Integer}} and {{Java|int}}, {{Java|Character}} and {{Java|char}}, {{Java|Float}} and {{Java|float}}, etc. LanguagesOne likecan [[C++]]then havedefine littlea or{{Java|LinkedList}} nousing notionthe ofboxed type {{Java|Integer}} and insert {{Java|int}} values into the list by boxing them as {{Java|Integer}} objects. (Using [[referencegeneric typeprogramming|generic]]; thusparameterized types introduced in [[Java Platform, theStandard useEdition|J2SE]] of5.0, objectthis type is ofrepresented littleas interest{{Java|LinkedList<Integer>}}.)
 
==Boxing==
Boxing, otherwise known as wrapping, is the process of placing a primitive type within an object so that the primitive can be used as a reference object. For example, in Java, a {{Java|LinkedList}} can change its size, but an array must have a fixed size. One might desire to have a {{Java|LinkedList}} of {{Java|int}}, but the {{Java|LinkedList}} class only lists references to dynamic objects—it cannot list primitive types, which are value types.
 
To circumvent this, {{Java|int}} can be boxed into {{Java|Integer}}, which are dynamic objects, and then added to a {{Java|LinkedList}} of {{Java|Integer}}. (Using [[generic programming|generic]] parameterized types introduced in [[Java Platform, Standard Edition|J2SE]] 5.0, this type is represented as {{Java|LinkedList<Integer>}}.)
On the other hand, [[C Sharp (programming language)|C#]] has no primitive wrapper classes, but allows boxing of any value type, returning a generic {{C sharp|Object}} reference. In [[Objective-C]], any primitive value can be prefixed by a {{ObjC|@}} to make an {{ObjC|NSNumber}} out of it (e.g. {{ObjC|@123}} or {{ObjC|@(123)}}). This allows for adding them in any of the standard collections, such as an {{ObjC|NSArray}}.
 
[[Haskell]] has little or no notion of [[reference type]], but still uses the term "boxed" for the runtime system's uniform pointer-to-[[tagged union]] representation.<ref>{{cite web |title=7.2. Unboxed types and primitive operations |url=https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/6.12.1/docs/html/users_guide/primitives.html |website=downloads.haskell.org |access-date=10 August 2022}}</ref>
 
The boxed object is always a copy of the value object, and is usually [[immutable object|immutable]]. Unboxing the object also returns a copy of the stored value. Repeated boxing and unboxing of objects can have a severe performance impact, because boxing [[dynamic memory allocation|dynamically allocates]] new objects and unboxing (if the boxed value is no longer used) then makes them eligible for [[garbage collection (computer science)|garbage collection]]. However, modern garbage collectors such as the default Java HotSpot garbage collector can more efficiently collect short-lived objects, so if the boxed objects are short-lived, the performance impact may not be severe.
Line 20 ⟶ 16:
In some languages, there is a direct equivalence between an unboxed primitive type and a reference to an immutable, boxed object type. In fact, it is possible to substitute all the primitive types in a program with boxed object types. Whereas assignment from one primitive to another will copy its value, assignment from one reference to a boxed object to another will copy the reference value to refer to the same object as the first reference. However, this will not cause any problems, because the objects are immutable, so there is semantically no real difference between two references to the same object or to different objects (unless you look at physical equality). For all operations other than assignment, such as arithmetic, comparison, and logical operators, one can unbox the boxed type, perform the operation, and re-box the result as needed. Thus, it is possible to not store primitive types at all.
 
===Autoboxing===
Autoboxing is the term for getting a reference type out of a value type just through [[type conversion]] (either implicit or explicit). The compiler automatically supplies the extra source code that creates the object.
 
Line 30 ⟶ 26:
</syntaxhighlight>
 
Compilers prior to 5.0 would not accept the last line. {{Java|Integer}} are reference objects, on the surface no different from {{Java|List}}, {{Java|Object}}, and so forth. To convert from an {{Java|int}} to an {{Java|Integer}}, one had to "manually" instantiate the Integer object. As of J2SE 5.0, the compiler will accept the last line, and automatically transform it so that an Integer object is created to store the value {{Java|9}}.<ref>[https://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/language/autoboxing.html oracle.com Java language guide entry on autoboxing]</ref> This means that, from J2SE 5.0 on, something like {{Java|1=Integer c = a + b}}, where {{Java|a}} and {{Java|b}} are {{Java|Integer}} themselves, will compile now - a and b are unboxed, the integer values summed up, and the result is autoboxed into a new {{Java|Integer}}, which is finally stored inside variable {{Java|c}}. The equality operators cannot be used this way, because the equality operators are already defined for reference types, for equality of the references; to test for equality of the value in a boxed type, one must still manually unbox them and compare the primitives, or use the {{Java|Objects.equals}} method.
 
Another example: J2SE 5.0 allows the programmer to treat a collection (such as a {{Java|LinkedList}}) as if it contained {{Java|int}} values instead of {{Java|Integer}} objects. This does not contradict what was said above: the collection still only contains references to dynamic objects, and it cannot list primitive types. It cannot be a {{Java|LinkedList<int>}}, but it must be a {{Java|LinkedList<Integer>}} instead. However, the compiler automatically transforms the code so that the list will "silently" receive objects, while the source code only mentions primitive values. For example, the programmer can now write {{Java|list.add(3)}} and think as if the {{Java|int}} {{Java|3}} were added to the list; but, the compiler will have actually transformed the line into {{Java|list.add(new Integer(3))}}.
 
===UnboxingAutomatic unboxing===
UnboxingWith refersautomatic to gettingunboxing the value that is associated to a given object, just through type conversion (either implicit or explicit). The compiler automatically supplies the extra source code that retrieves the value out of that object, either by invoking some method on that object, or by other means.
 
For example, in versions of Java prior to J2SE 5.0, the following code did not compile:
Line 50 ⟶ 46:
 
C#:
<syntaxhighlight lang=CSharp"csharp">
int i = 42;
object o = i; // box
Line 58 ⟶ 54:
 
Java:
<syntaxhighlight lang=Java"java">
int i = 42;
Object o = i; // box
Line 65 ⟶ 61:
</syntaxhighlight>
 
== Boxing in Rust ==
===Type helpers===
[[Rust (programming language)|Rust]] has the {{Code|Box}} type, which represents a uniquely owned, heap-allocated value:<ref>{{cite web |title=std::boxed - Rust |url=https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/boxed/index.html |website=doc.rust-lang.org |access-date=2 June 2025}}</ref>
<syntaxhighlight lang="rust">
let number: Box<i32> = Box::new(42);
</syntaxhighlight>
If the value needs to have shared ownership (e.g. between threads), one can use {{Code|Arc}}, which represents a reference-counted, heap-allocated value.<ref>{{cite web |title=Arc in std::sync - Rust |url=https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/sync/struct.Arc.html |website=doc.rust-lang.org |access-date=18 January 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Arc - Rust By Example |url=https://doc.rust-lang.org/rust-by-example/std/arc.html |website=doc.rust-lang.org |access-date=18 January 2025}}</ref>
 
===Type helpers===
Modern [[Object Pascal]] has yet another way to perform operations on simple types, close to boxing, called type helpers in [[FreePascal]] or record helpers in [[Delphi (programming language)|Delphi]] and [[FreePascal]] in Delphi mode.<br>
The dialects mentioned are Object Pascal compile-to-native languages, and so miss some of the features that C# and Java can implement. Notably run-time [[type inference]] on strongly typed variables.<br>
But the feature is related to boxing.<br>
It allows the programmer to use constructs like
<syntaxhighlight lang="pascal">
{$ifdef fpc}{$mode delphi}{$endif}
uses sysutils; // this unit contains wraps for the simple types
Line 89 ⟶ 92:
[[Category:Data types]]
[[Category:Java (programming language)]]
[[Category:Programming language topicsconcepts]]