Content deleted Content added
Grammatical edits |
→Empirical studies: Add a comma. |
||
| (39 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{short description|Evolutionary
[[File:Vipera_aspis_aspis.jpg|thumb|alt=Vipera Aspis.|
The '''
According to the theory, predatory pressure on early primate populations from snakes
recognize them, improving their survival chances and therefore transferring such skill to their offspring. From this point of view, snakes were responsible for the modification and expansion of primate visual systems which made [[visual perception|vision]] the most developed sensory interface with the external environment for modern primates.
In her book ''The Fruit, the Tree, and the Serpent'' (2009),<ref>{{cite book|last1=Isbell|first1=Lynne A.|title=The Fruit, the Tree, and the Serpent|date=2009|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yKzIuw4YBCoC&
The concept of snakes being a special threat to humans has been confirmed by population-based studies. [[Ophidiophobia]] (phobia of snakes) is one of the most common and intense phobias among the general population. Furthermore, a study reported that around 50% of
== Empirical studies ==
Many empirical studies have found evidence for the theory.
Regardless, in experiments, images of snakes have been detected more rapidly than other fear-relevant stimuli: empirical studies have shown that snakes are more rapidly detected than [[spiders]].
Snake stimuli are particularly distracting during perceptual tasks, suggesting that the brain preferentially processes snake stimuli, even when attentional processes are demanded by other targets.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Soares|first1=Sandra C.|title=The lurking snake in the grass: interference of snake stimuli in visually taxing conditions|journal=Evolutionary Psychology|date=15 April 2012|volume=10|issue=2|pages=187–197|pmid=22947633|issn=1474-7049}}</ref>▼
▲Snake stimuli are particularly distracting during perceptual tasks, suggesting that the brain preferentially processes snake stimuli, even when attentional processes are demanded by other targets.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Soares|first1=Sandra C.|title=The lurking snake in the grass: interference of snake stimuli in visually taxing conditions|journal=Evolutionary Psychology|date=15 April 2012|volume=10|issue=2|pages=187–197|doi=10.1177/147470491201000202|pmid=22947633|s2cid=34814663|issn=1474-7049|doi-access=free|hdl=10316/102719|hdl-access=free|pmc=10481044}}</ref>
Enhanced snake detection has also been found in young children.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=LoBue|first1=Vanessa|last2=DeLoache|first2=Judy S.|title=Detecting the Snake in the Grass: Attention to Fear-Relevant Stimuli by Adults and Young Children|journal=Psychological Science|date=1 March 2008|volume=19|issue=3|pages=284–289|doi=10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02081.x|pmid=18315802|s2cid=12776572|language=en|issn=0956-7976}}</ref>
Brain imaging investigations have found further evidence for the theory. Support for the idea of a high visual sensitivity to snakes has been proven in primate neural activity in response to snake threats.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Van Le|first1=Quan|last2=Isbell|first2=Lynne A.|last3=Matsumoto|first3=Jumpei|last4=Nguyen|first4=Minh|last5=Hori|first5=Etsuro|last6=Maior|first6=Rafael S.|last7=Tomaz|first7=Carlos|last8=Tran|first8=Anh Hai|last9=Ono|first9=Taketoshi|last10=Nishijo|first10=Hisao|title=Pulvinar neurons reveal neurobiological evidence of past selection for rapid detection of snakes|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|date=19 November 2013|volume=110|issue=47|pages=19000–19005|doi=10.1073/pnas.1312648110|pmid=24167268|issn=1091-6490|pmc=3839741|bibcode=2013PNAS..11019000V|doi-access=free}}</ref> Non-invasive
== References ==
{{reflist}}
[[Category:
[[Category:Snakes]]
| |||