Content deleted Content added
Restored revision 1086652235 by Maxeto0910 (Restorer) Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Reverted 1 edit by 135.180.128.228 (talk): Forum posts are not usable sources |
||
(47 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{
In [[calculus]], it is usually possible to compute the [[limit (mathematics)|limit]] of the sum, difference, product, quotient or power of two functions by taking the corresponding combination of the separate limits of each respective function. For example,
<math display=block>\begin{align}
\lim_{x \to c} \bigl(f(x) + g(x)\bigr) &= \lim_{x \to c} f(x) + \lim_{x \to c} g(x), \\[3mu]
\lim_{x \to c} \bigl(f(x)g(x)\bigr) &= \lim_{x \to c} f(x) \cdot \lim_{x \to c} g(x),
\end{align}</math>
and likewise for other arithmetic operations; this is sometimes called the [[limit of a function#Properties|algebraic limit theorem]]. However, certain combinations of particular limiting values cannot be computed in this way, and knowing the limit of each function separately does not suffice to determine the limit of the combination. In these particular situations, the limit is said to take an '''indeterminate form''', described by one of the informal expressions
:<math>\frac 00,~ \frac{\infty}{\infty},~ 0\times\infty,~ \infty - \infty,~ 0^0,~ 1^\infty, \text{ and } \infty^0 .</math>▼
▲
The most common example of an indeterminate form occurs when determining the limit of the ratio of two functions, in which both of these functions tend to zero in the limit, and is referred to as "the indeterminate form <math>0/0</math>". For example, as <math>x</math> approaches <math>0~</math>, the ratios <math>x/x^3</math>, <math>x/x</math>, and <math>x^2/x</math> go to <math>\infty</math>, <math>1</math>, and <math>0~</math> respectively. In each case, if the limits of the numerator and denominator are substituted, the resulting expression is <math>0/0</math>, which is undefined. In a loose manner of speaking, <math>0/0</math> can take on the values <math>0~</math>, <math>1</math>, or <math>\infty</math>, and it is easy to construct similar examples for which the limit is any particular value.▼
among a wide variety of uncommon others, where each expression stands for the limit of a function constructed by an arithmetical combination of two functions whose limits respectively tend to {{tmath|0,}} {{tmath|1,}} or {{tmath|\infty}} as indicated.{{sfnp|Varberg|Purcell|Rigdon|2007|p=423, 429, 430, 431, 432}}
So, given that two [[function (mathematics)|functions]] <math>f(x)</math> and <math>g(x)</math> both approaching <math>0~</math> as <math>x</math> approaches some [[limit point]] <math>c</math>, that fact alone does not give enough information for evaluating the [[limit of a function|limit]]▼
A limit taking one of these indeterminate forms might tend to zero, might tend to any finite value, might tend to infinity, or might diverge, depending on the specific functions involved. A limit which unambiguously tends to infinity, for instance <math display=inline>\lim_{x \to 0} 1/x^2 = \infty,</math> is not considered indeterminate.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Indeterminate.html|title=Indeterminate|last=Weisstein|first=Eric W.|website=mathworld.wolfram.com|language=en|access-date=2019-12-02}}</ref> The term was originally introduced by [[Cauchy]]'s student [[Moigno]] in the middle of the 19th century.
{{block indent|<math> \lim_{x \to c} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} .</math>}}▼
▲The most common example of an indeterminate form
▲So
▲{{block indent|<math> \lim_{x \to c} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} .</math>}}
An expression that arises by ways other than applying the algebraic limit theorem may have the same form of an indeterminate form. However it is not appropriate to call an expression "indeterminate form" if the expression is made outside the context of determining limits.
▲Another example is the expression <math>0^0</math>. Whether this expression is left undefined, or is defined to equal <math>1</math>, depends on the field of application and may vary between authors. For more, see the article [[Zero to the power of zero]]. Note that <math>0^\infty</math> and other expressions involving infinity [[#Expressions that are not indeterminate forms|are not indeterminate forms]].
== Some examples and non-examples ==
=== Indeterminate form 0/0 ===
{{Redirect|0/0|the symbol|Percent sign|0 divided by 0|Division by zero}}
<gallery>
File:Indeterminate form - x over x.gif|Fig. 1: {{var|y}} = {{sfrac|{{var|x}}|{{var|x}}}}
Line 46 ⟶ 52:
===Indeterminate form 0<sup>0</sup> ===
{{main|Zero to the power of zero}}
{{multiple image
| image1 = Indeterminate form - x0.gif
| caption2 = Graph of {{math|1=''y'' = 0{{sup|''x''}}}}
| total_width = 300
| direction = vertical
}}
The following limits illustrate that the expression <math>0^0</math> is an indeterminate form:
<math display="block"> \begin{align}
\lim_{x \to 0^+} x^0 &= 1, \\
\lim_{x \to 0^+} 0^x &= 0.
\end{align} </math>
If the functions <math>f</math> and <math>g</math> are [[Analytic function|analytic]] at <math>c</math>, and <math>f</math> is positive for <math>x</math> sufficiently close (but not equal) to <math>c</math>, then the limit of <math>f(x)^{g(x)}</math> will be <math>1</math>.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.2307/2689754 |author1=Louis M. Rotando |author2=Henry Korn |title=The indeterminate form 0<sup>0</sup> |journal=Mathematics Magazine |date=January 1977 |volume=50 |issue=1 |pages=41–42|jstor=2689754 }}</ref> Otherwise, use the transformation in the [[#List of indeterminate forms|table]] below to evaluate the limit.
Line 64 ⟶ 73:
=== Expressions that are not indeterminate forms ===
The expression <math>1/0</math> is not commonly regarded as an indeterminate form, because if the limit of <math>f/g</math> exists then there is no ambiguity as to its value, as it always diverges. Specifically, if <math>f</math> approaches <math>1</math> and <math>g</math> approaches <math>0
# <math>f/g</math> approaches <math>+\infty</math>
Line 70 ⟶ 79:
# The limit fails to exist.
In each case the absolute value <math>|f/g|</math> approaches <math>+\infty</math>, and so the quotient <math>f/g</math> must diverge, in the sense of the [[extended real number]]s (in the framework of the [[projectively extended real line]], the limit is the [[Point at infinity|unsigned infinity]] <math>\infty</math> in all three cases<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|url=https://www.cut-the-knot.org/blue/GhostCity.shtml|title=Undefined vs Indeterminate in Mathematics|website=www.cut-the-knot.org|access-date=2019-12-02}}</ref>). Similarly, any expression of the form <math>a/0</math> with <math>a\ne0</math> (including <math>a=+\infty</math> and <math>a=-\infty</math>) is not an indeterminate form, since a quotient giving rise to such an expression will always diverge.
The expression <math>0^\infty</math> is not an indeterminate form. The expression <math>0^{+\infty}</math> obtained from considering <math>\lim_{x \to c} f(x)^{g(x)}</math> gives the limit <math>0
To see why, let <math>L = \lim_{x \to c} f(x)^{g(x)},</math> where <math> \lim_{x \to c} {f(x)}=0,</math> and <math> \lim_{x \to c} {g(x)}=\infty.</math> By taking the natural logarithm of both sides and using <math> \lim_{x \to c} \ln{f(x)}=-\infty,</math> we get that <math>\ln L = \lim_{x \to c} ({g(x)}\times\ln{f(x)})=\infty\times{-\infty}=-\infty,</math> which means that <math>L = {e}^{-\infty}=0.</math>
Line 89 ⟶ 98:
Suppose there are two equivalent infinitesimals <math>\alpha \sim \alpha'</math> and <math>\beta \sim \beta'</math>.
For the evaluation of the indeterminate form <math>0/0</math>, one can make use of the following facts about equivalent [[infinitesimal]]s (e.g., <math>x\sim\sin x</math> if ''x'' becomes closer to zero):<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.vaxasoftware.com/doc_eduen/mat/infiequi.pdf|title=Table of equivalent infinitesimals|website=Vaxa Software}}</ref>
Line 104 ⟶ 114:
{{block indent|<math>e^x - 1\sim x,</math>}}
{{block indent|<math>(1 + x)^a - 1 \sim ax.</math>}}
For example:
<math display=block>\begin{align}
\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1}{x^3} \left[\left(\frac{2+\cos x}{3}\right)^x - 1 \right]
&= \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^{x\ln{\frac{2 + \cos x}{3}}}-1}{x^3} \\
&= \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1}{x^2} \ln \frac{2+ \cos x}{3} \\
&= \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1}{x^2} \ln \left(\frac{\cos x -1}{3}+1\right) \\
&= \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\cos x -1}{3x^2} \\
&= \lim_{x \to 0} -\frac{x^2}{6x^2} \\
&= -\frac{1}{6}
\end{align}</math>
In the 2nd equality, <math>e^y - 1 \sim y</math> where <math>y = x\ln{2+\cos x \over 3}</math> as ''y'' become closer to 0 is used, and <math>y \sim \ln {(1+y)}</math> where <math>y = {{\cos x - 1} \over 3}</math> is used in the 4th equality, and <math>1-\cos x \sim {x^2 \over 2}</math> is used in the 5th equality.
Line 122 ⟶ 143:
== List of indeterminate forms ==
The following table lists the most common indeterminate forms
{| border=1 class="wikitable" style="
!Indeterminate form
!Conditions
Line 130 ⟶ 151:
!Transformation to <math>\infty/\infty</math>
|-
|{{sfrac|<math>0</math>|<math>0</math>}}
|<math> \lim_{x \to c} f(x) = 0,\ \lim_{x \to c} g(x) = 0 \! </math>
|
|<math> \lim_{x \to c} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \lim_{x \to c} \frac{1/g(x)}{1/f(x)} \! </math>
|-
Line 138 ⟶ 159:
|<math> \lim_{x \to c} f(x) = \infty,\ \lim_{x \to c} g(x) = \infty \! </math>
|<math> \lim_{x \to c} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \lim_{x \to c} \frac{1/g(x)}{1/f(x)} \! </math>
|
|-
|<math>0\cdot\infty</math>
Line 176 ⟶ 197:
== References ==
=== Citations ===
{{reflist}}
=== Bibliographies ===
* {{cite book
| last1 = Varberg | first1 = Dale E.
| last2 = Purcell | first2 = Edwin J.
| last3 = Rigdon | first3 = Steven E.
| title = Calculus
| year = 2007
| publisher = [[Pearson Prentice Hall]]
| edition = 9th
| isbn = 978-0131469686
}}
{{Calculus topics}}
|