Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Episode coverage task force: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:11, 28 November 2017

Latest revision as of 03:32, 5 July 2025

(32 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{talk header}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|

{{WikiProject Television|class=Project|importance=NA|episode-coverage=Yes|episode-coverage-importance=NAyes}}

}}

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Navigation}}

{{Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Episodes/Archive}}

Line 13 ⟶ 15:

}}

== Requested move at [[Talk:Udûn#Requested move 8 August 2024]] ==

== Brave Witches ==

[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Udûn#Requested move 8 August 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User talk:Reading Beans|<span style="color:#333">'''Reading Beans'''</span>]] 19:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi. There seems to be some issues regarding wording issues in the episode summaries and lead section on [[List of Brave Witches episodes]], which I intend to take as FL in the future. These can be found at [[Talk:List of Brave Witches episodes#Episode summaries]] and [[Talk:List of Brave Witches episodes#FL push?]] (the lead section discussion is in that particular thread). Comments from project members would be very much appreciated. Thanks, [[User:Sjones23|Lord Sjones23]] ([[User talk:Sjones23|talk]] - [[User:Sjones23/Wikipedia contributions|contributions]]) 22:22, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

== Notice about adminship to participants at this project ==

Many participants here create a lot of content, may have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, decide if content complies with BLP policy, and much more. Well, these are just some of the skills considered at [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship]].

So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:

*'''[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll]]'''

You could be very helpful in evaluating potential candidates, and even finding out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.

Many thanks and best wishes,

== Requested move at [[Talk:The Man Behind the Curtain#Requested move 20 August 2024]] ==

[[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak|talk]]) 05:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:The Man Behind the Curtain#Requested move 20 August 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:Aprilajune|Aprilajune]] ([[User talk:Aprilajune|talk]]) 02:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:Squid Game season 2#Requested move 9 January 2025]] ==

== Mother's Day (Rugrats) - featured article candidate ==

[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Squid Game season 2#Requested move 9 January 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:D.18th|<b style="color:#008080; text-shadow:0.1em 0.2em 0.1em #FFF8E7">𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑</b>]] [[User talk:D.18th|<b style="color:#008080; text-shadow:0.1em 0.2em 0.1em #FFF8E7"><small>(𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔)</small></b>]] 12:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

== Re: Breakaway (Space: 1999) ==

I've nominated the article about the episode [[Mother's Day (Rugrats)|"Mother's Day" (''Rugrats'')]] for Featured Article consideration. This article is on the Mother’s Day special from the animated television series ''[[Rugrats]]'', which aired on May 6, 1997. Comments would be appreciated, at '''[[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mother's Day (Rugrats)/archive1]]'''. Thank you for your time. [[User:Aoba47|Aoba47]] ([[User talk:Aoba47|talk]]) 17:41, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

The plot section on [[Breakaway (Space: 1999)]] is currently 2,036 words 12,909 characters. It has been this way for more than a decade. I have tagged it as long plot. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 00:54, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

== "Looking for Now" (''Looking'' television episode) ==

== Requested move at [[Talk:The Movie#Requested move 20 April 2025]] ==

"[[Looking for Now]]" has been nominated for deletion, if project members want to contribute to the ongoing discussion and/or help expand the article. Thanks! ---[[User:Another Believer|<span style="color:navy">Another Believer</span>]] _{([[User talk:Another Believer|<span style="color:#C60">Talk</span>]])} 19:53, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:The Movie#Requested move 20 April 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''^{[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]} 23:09, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

== Unnamed episodes with number only, but no context ==

== migrate episode data and references to wikidata ==

Recently some Neighbours episodes popped up on my redirect changes watchlist after being [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Episode_6188&diff=prev&oldid=1298782547 moved], and then [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Episode_6188&diff=prev&oldid=1298782547 moved back]. [[User:DaniloDaysOfOurLives]] stated that it was "standard practice" to just name the article [[Episode 6188]] and not [[Neighbours episode 6188]] or [[Episode 6188 (Neighbours)]] or similar. I assume this has been discussed before, but I can't find it after a brief look around here. It doesn't seem to be mentioned in any [[WP:NCTV]] guidelines. I understand that there is probably no other Episode 6188 of any other show that's going to be notable enough to have an article, but I think it is such a vague title that it fails parts of [[WP:AT]] including "Recognizability – The title is a name or description of the subject that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize" and "Precision – The title unambiguously identifies the article's subject and distinguishes it from other subjects". An episode number without the context of the show name doesn't satisfy these [[WP:CRITERIA]]. [[User:The-Pope|The-Pope]] ([[User talk:The-Pope|talk]]) 03:32, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Is it OK to migrate data and references for each episode to wikidata, for example, migrating each episode data from ''[[List of One Piece episodes (season 1)]]'' to [[d:Q43371394|

One Piece episode 1]], 2, 3, and so in wikidata?

This will make it be harder to monitor or watch the changes? As the episode list data will be broken into many items/pages in wikidata.

--[[User:Ans|Ans]] ([[User talk:Ans|talk]]) 14:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)