Stretchable microelectrode array: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Hessengraudi (talk): using Wikipedia for advertising/promotion (HG) (3.4.12)
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Altered title. Add: bibcode, pmid, url, authors 1-1. Removed URL that duplicated identifier. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Articles that may contain original research from June 2025 | #UCB_Category 47/225
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Multiple issues|
{{Orphan|date=November 2024}}
{{essay-like|date=June 2025}}
{{original research|date=June 2025}}
{{refimprove|date=May 2025}}
}}
{{Short description|Device in neurophysiology}}
 
[[File:Stretchable Microelectrode Array (sMEA) with PDMS glue.jpg|thumb|Stretchable Microelectrodemicroelectrode Arrayarray (sMEA)]]
'''Stretchable microelectrode arrays (stretchable MEAs or sMEAs)''' (also referred to as stretchable [[microelectrode array|multielectrode arrays]]) are a specialized type of microelectrode array (MEA) with a key advantage; they can be deformed, stretched, bent, and twisted while maintaining electrical functionality whereas standard MEAs break upon mechanical [[Structural load|loading]]. Flexible MEAs (flexMEA), which are often confounded with stretchable MEAs, lie in between stretchable MEAs and standard MEA in terms of their [[mechanical properties]] because they bend and twist to some degree, but not stretch.
Just like traditional MEAs, stretchable MEAs consist of a few thousand microelectrodes that allow recording or stimulation of electrical signals from cells (neurons, muscles, etc.), and are used [[in vivo]] in a living being or [[in vitro]] with cell cultures.
Line 8 ⟶ 13:
A stretchable conductor typically consists of two components: an [[elastomeric]] insulator and an [[electrical conductor]]. There are several approaches to producing stretchable and electrical conducting materials that fall into two categories: [[structural design]] and material innovation. [[File:Stretchable Microelectrode Array (sMEA) before and during stretch.png|thumb|left| sMEA before and during stretch]]
 
===Material Innovationinnovation===
* '''Electronic Fillers''': This is the oldest approach to making an [[elastomeric]] material elastically stretchable. In principle, rigid and [[electrically conductive]] materials and mixed with an elastomeric [[polymer]] before curing to create stretchable composites. If the concentration of the electrically conductive filler is high enough they form a mesh-like [[percolation]] network that facilitates the free movement of charge carriers (ions, electrons) through contact junctions. The minimum concentration of the electronic filler material that is required to create conductive pathways for [[charge carrier]] transport through the elastomer<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kyrylyuk |first1=Andriy V. |last2=van der Schoot |first2=Paul |title=Continuum percolation of carbon nanotubes in polymeric and colloidal media |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |date=17 June 2008 |volume=105 |issue=24 |pages=8221–8226 |doi=10.1073/pnas.0711449105 |doi-access=free |pmid=18550818 |pmc=2448818 |bibcode=2008PNAS..105.8221K }}</ref> is called the [[percolation threshold]].<ref>{{cite book |doi=10.1016/B978-1-895198-95-9.50011-X |chapter=Structure and Distribution of Non-Migrating Antistatics |title=Handbook of Antistatics |date=2016 |pages=117–127 |isbn=978-1-895198-95-9 |editor1-first=Jürgen |editor1-last=Pionteck |editor2-first=George |editor2-last=Wypych }}</ref> The [[percolation threshold]] is usually indicated as weight percentage (wt%) or volume percentage (vol%) of the filler material, and ranges from less than 1wt% for high aspect ration carbon [[nanotubes]] to over 15wt%. The type of filler materials ranges from metals in powder or [[nanowire]] form, [[carbon]] as [[graphite]] or [[nanotubes]], to electrically conducting polymers.
* '''‘Wavy’ [[Nanowires]] and Nanoribbons''': The spontaneous formation of wavy patterns of aligned [[buckles]] that is caused by the deposition of a thin gold film on the surface of the [[elastomer]] [[polydimethylsiloxane]] (PDMS) was first described by the group of George Whitesides at Harvard University in 2000.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Huck |first1=Wilhelm T. S. |last2=Bowden |first2=Ned |last3=Onck |first3=Patrick |last4=Pardoen |first4=Thomas |last5=Hutchinson |first5=John W. |last6=Whitesides |first6=George M. |title=Ordering of Spontaneously Formed Buckles on Planar Surfaces |journal=Langmuir |date=April 2000 |volume=16 |issue=7 |pages=3497–3501 |doi=10.1021/la991302l }}</ref> The gold was deposited on warmed PDMS (100&nbsp;°C), and, upon cooling and the associated thermal shrinkage of the elastomer, the gold film comes under compressive stress which is relieved by creating [[buckles]]. In subsequent years, the group of John Rogers at the University of Urbana Champaign (now at Northwestern University) has developed the technology to bond very thin silicon ribbons to a pre-stretched PDMS membrane. Upon relaxation of the per-stretch, the compressive [[mechanical stress]] in the [[silicon]] ribbons is relieved by creating wavy buckles in the PDMS. As silicon is a brittle material, the ribbons need to very thin (about 100&nbsp;nm) to stay intact during buckling.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kim |first1=Dae-Hyeong |last2=Rogers |first2=John A. |title=Stretchable Electronics: Materials Strategies and Devices |journal=Advanced Materials |date=17 December 2008 |volume=20 |issue=24 |pages=4887–4892 |doi=10.1002/adma.200801788 |bibcode=2008AdM....20.4887K }}</ref>
* '''Liquid Metals''': A [[metal]] or [[alloy]] that is liquid at room temperature can be enclosed in PDMS and used as a stretchable [[Electrical conductor|conductor]]. [[Mercury (element)|Mercury]] is the only pure metal that is liquid at room temperature but has limited application due to its [[neurotoxicity]]. Cesium melts at 28.5&nbsp;°C, but reacts violently when exposed to air and is therefore not suitable for this application. Most researchers therefore use an [[eutectic]] mixture of Indium and Gallium, so called EGaIn, which has a melting point is 15.7&nbsp;°C and consists of 75.5% Gallium and 24.5% Indium. A eutectic mixture of Ga (68.5%), In (21.5%) and Sn (10.0%), also known as [[Galinstan]], is another popular choice and has a melting point of 10.5&nbsp;°C.
* '''Microcracked gold thin film''': When a thin gold film is deposited on PDMS under certain conditions,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Graudejus |first1=Oliver |last2=Görrn |first2=Patrick |last3=Wagner |first3=Sigurd |title=Controlling the Morphology of Gold Films on Poly(dimethylsiloxane) |journal=ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces |date=28 July 2010 |volume=2 |issue=7 |pages=1927–1933 |doi=10.1021/am1002537 |pmid=20608644 }}</ref> the gold film adopts a microcracked morphology<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lacour |first1=Stéphanie P. |last2=Chan |first2=Donald |last3=Wagner |first3=Sigurd |last4=Li |first4=Teng |last5=Suo |first5=Zhigang |title=Mechanisms of reversible stretchability of thin metal films on elastomeric substrates |journal=Applied Physics Letters |date=15 May 2006 |volume=88 |issue=20 |doi=10.1063/1.2201874 |bibcode=2006ApPhL..88t4103L |url=http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41467478 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> which makes the gold stretchable. The maximum [[Strain (mechanics)|strain]] of the film decreases with the length and increases with the width of the conductor.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Graudejus |first1=O. |last2=Jia |first2=Zheng |last3=Li |first3=Teng |last4=Wagner |first4=S. |title=Size-dependent rupture strain of elastically stretchable metal conductors |journal=Scripta Materialia |date=June 2012 |volume=66 |issue=11 |pages=919–922 |doi=10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.02.034 |pmid=22773917 |pmc=3388513 }}</ref>
 
===Structural Designdesign===
* '''Geometric patterning, [[fractal]] patterns''': Metal traces are deposited in specific patterns, such as meandering or [[Serpentine shape|serpentine]] shapes, within a stretchable elastomeric substrate to accommodate [[Strain (mechanics)|strain]]. The resulting structure is akin to a 2-dimensional spring. The University of Ghent and IMEC in Belgium have pioneered the approach to using Meander shaped metallic structures.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Gonzalez |first1=Mario |last2=Vandevelde |first2=Bart |last3=Christiaens |first3=Wim |last4=Hsu |first4=Yung-Yu |last5=Iker |first5=François |last6=Bossuyt |first6=Frederick |last7=Vanfleteren |first7=Jan |last8=Sluis |first8=Olaf van der |last9=Timmermans |first9=P.H.M. |title=Design and implementation of flexible and stretchable systems |journal=Microelectronics Reliability |date=June 2011 |volume=51 |issue=6 |pages=1069–1076 |doi=10.1016/j.microrel.2011.03.012 |bibcode=2011MiRe...51.1069G }}</ref>
** The group of John Rogers increased the maximum strain in devices created by this approach using fractal-based structures. These fractal patterns are characterized by self-similarity, i.e., a small sections of the structure yields pieces with geometries that resemble the whole structure.
**These fractal patterns include (i) Koch, Peano, Hilbert lines, (ii) Moore, Vicsek loops, and (iii) Greek crosses.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Fan |first1=Jonathan A. |last2=Yeo |first2=Woon-Hong |last3=Su |first3=Yewang |last4=Hattori |first4=Yoshiaki |last5=Lee |first5=Woosik |last6=Jung |first6=Sung-Young |last7=Zhang |first7=Yihui |last8=Liu |first8=Zhuangjian |last9=Cheng |first9=Huanyu |last10=Falgout |first10=Leo |last11=Bajema |first11=Mike |last12=Coleman |first12=Todd |last13=Gregoire |first13=Dan |last14=Larsen |first14=Ryan J. |last15=Huang |first15=Yonggang |last16=Rogers |first16=John A. |title=Fractal design concepts for stretchable electronics |journal=Nature Communications |date=7 February 2014 |volume=5 |issue=1 |page=3266 |doi=10.1038/ncomms4266 |pmid=24509865 |bibcode=2014NatCo...5.3266F |osti=1875439 }}</ref>
* '''Origami-inspired structures, and [[kirigami]] cuts''': Intrinsically rigid or inelastic flexible materials can be turned into stretchable materials by applying [[origami]] technology<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Chen |first1=Xingru |last2=Li |first2=Yongkai |last3=Wang |first3=Xiaoyi |last4=Yu |first4=Hongyu |title=Origami Paper-Based Stretchable Humidity Sensor for Textile-Attachable Wearable Electronics |journal=ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces |date=10 August 2022 |volume=14 |issue=31 |pages=36227–36237 |doi=10.1021/acsami.2c08245 |pmid=35912486 }}</ref> and kirigami cuts.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Xu |first1=Renxiao |last2=Zverev |first2=Anton |last3=Hung |first3=Aaron |last4=Shen |first4=Caiwei |last5=Irie |first5=Lauren |last6=Ding |first6=Geoffrey |last7=Whitmeyer |first7=Michael |last8=Ren |first8=Liangjie |last9=Griffin |first9=Brandon |last10=Melcher |first10=Jack |last11=Zheng |first11=Lily |last12=Zang |first12=Xining |last13=Sanghadasa |first13=Mohan |last14=Lin |first14=Liwei |title=Kirigami-inspired, highly stretchable micro-supercapacitor patches fabricated by laser conversion and cutting |journal=Microsystems & Nanoengineering |date=3 December 2018 |volume=4 |issue=1 |page=36 |doi=10.1038/s41378-018-0036-z |pmid=31057924 |pmc=6275159 |bibcode=2018MicNa...4...36X }}</ref>
 
==History==
The first time the term stretchable multielectrode array (sMEA) [[File:Manually Stretching Microelectrode Array.jpg|thumb|left|Manually stretching sMEA]] Understanding how cells convert [[stimulus (physiology)|mechanical stimuli]] appeared in the literature was in a conference proceeding in 2002 from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.<ref>{{cite book |doi=10.1109/MMB.2002.1002269 |chapter=Stretchable micro-electrode array &#91;for retinal prosthesis&#93; |title=2nd Annual International IEEE-EMBS Special Topic Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology. Proceedings (Cat. No.02EX578) |date=2002 |last1=Maghribi |first1=M. |last2=Hamilton |first2=J. |last3=Polla |first3=D. |last4=Rose |first4=K. |last5=Wilson |first5=T. |last6=Krulevitch |first6=P. |pages=80–83 |isbn=0-7803-7480-0 }}</ref> This paper described the fabrication of an sMEA for a retinal [[prosthesis]], but no biological material was used, i.e., functionality to record or stimulate [[neural activity]] was not attempted. The first description of sMEAs being used to record [[neural activity]] in biological samples was in 2006 when the research group of Barclay Morrison at Columbia University and Sigurd Wagner at Princeton University reported recording of spontaneous activity in organotypic [[hippocampal]] tissue slices.<ref>{{cite book |doi=10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260933 |chapter=Stretchable microelectrode arrays a tool for discovering mechanisms of functional deficits underlying traumatic brain injury and interfacing neurons with neuroprosthetics |title=2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society |date=2006 |last1=Yu |first1=Zhe |last2=Tsay |first2=Candice |last3=Lacour |first3=Stephanie P. |last4=Wagner |first4=Sigurd |last5=Morrison |first5=Barclay |volume=Suppl |pages=6732–6735 |pmid=17959498 |isbn=1-4244-0032-5 |url=http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/176599 }}</ref> Neither the electrodes nor the tissue appears to have been stretched in these experiments. In 2008, a paper from the [[Georgia Institute of Technology]] and [[Emory University]] described the use of sMEAs in stimulating a [[explant]] of a rat [[spinal cord]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Meacham |first1=Kathleen W. |last2=Giuly |first2=Richard J. |last3=Guo |first3=Liang |last4=Hochman |first4=Shawn |last5=DeWeerth |first5=Stephen P. |title=A lithographically-patterned, elastic multi-electrode array for surface stimulation of the spinal cord |journal=Biomedical Microdevices |date=April 2008 |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=259–269 |doi=10.1007/s10544-007-9132-9 |pmid=17914674 |pmc=2573864 }}</ref> The sMEA was wrapped around the spinal cord, but not stretched, and the cells were electrically stimulated but not used in recording electrophysiological activity. In 2009, another paper of the Morrison/Wagner groups described for the first time the use of an sMEA with a biological sample being stretched as well as [[electrical stimulation]] and recording of [[electrophysiological]] activity being carried out before and after stretching.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Yu |first1=Zhe |last2=Graudejus |first2=Oliver |last3=Tsay |first3=Candice |last4=Lacour |first4=Stéphanie P. |last5=Wagner |first5=Sigurd |last6=Morrison |first6=Barclay |title=Monitoring Hippocampus Electrical Activity In Vitro on an Elastically Deformable Microelectrode Array |journal=Journal of Neurotrauma |date=July 2009 |volume=26 |issue=7 |pages=1135–1145 |doi=10.1089/neu.2008.0810 |pmid=19594385 |pmc=2848944 }}</ref> sMEAs for in vitro application are commercially available from BioMedical Sustainable Elastic Electronic Devices.{{citation needed|date=November 2024}}
 
In subsequent years, the number of research papers that describes different approaches to fabricating sMEAs and their use for [[in vitro]] and [[in vivo]] research has increased immensely.
 
==Types and Capabilitiescapabilities==
Stretchable microelectrode arrays (sMEAs) can be categorized whether they are used with [[Cell (biology)|cells]] or [[Tissue (biology)|tissue]] slices in a dish (in vitro) or whether they are implanted in an animal or human (in vivo).
 
Line 36 ⟶ 41:
* '''Spacing between microelectrodes''': The spacing between microelectrodes (center-to-center) is typically larger than 300μm for sMEAs and 200 μm for glass MEAs. but can be less than 20μm in CMOS MEAs.
 
The reason for these differences is that sMEAs are fabricated using soft elastomeric materials such as [[Polydimethylsiloxane|PDMS]] as substrate and [[Micro-encapsulation|encapsulation]] which have a much higher coefficient of thermal expansion and lower Young's Modulus than rigid MEAs that are built on glass, plastic or silicon (CMOS) substrates. These properties make it more challenging to align and bond small features. In addition, the maximum [[Strain (mechanics)|strain]] that the electrodes can tolerate decreases for narrower electrodes, which is why the electrodes leads are often wide, thus limiting the number electrodes.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Graudejus |first1=O. |last2=Jia |first2=Zheng |last3=Li |first3=Teng |last4=Wagner |first4=S. |title=Size-dependent rupture strain of elastically stretchable metal conductors |journal=Scripta Materialia |date=June 2012 |volume=66 |issue=11 |pages=919–922 |doi=10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.02.034 |pmid=22773917 |pmc=3388513 }}</ref> sMEAs for in vitro applications are only available commercially from BioMedical Sustainable Elastic Electronic Devices.{{citation<ref>BMSEED. needed|date=November"Integrated Biomechanics, Imaging, & Electrophysiology." BMSEED, [https://www.bmseed.com www.bmseed.com]. Accessed 10 Nov. 2024}}.</ref>
 
====Advantages====
There are several benefits of using soft and stretchable MEAs instead of traditional rigid or merely flexible MEAs. With traditional MEAs, the cells are grown on a rigid [[Substrate (biology)|substrate]] material such as [[glass]] or [[plastic]]. This environment is very different from the natural environment of the cells in the body, which causes the cells to behave differently [[in vitro]] than in their natural environment [[in vivo]]. This is a major issue for the use of rigid MEAs for pre-clinical research because the goal of pre-clinical research is to predict treatment outcomes in humans. The advantages of using sMEAs for pre-clinical research are twofold. First, the stiffness of the substrate that the cells are grown on matches more closely the stiffness of the cellular environment in the body. Second, sMEAs enable the application of [[Biomechanics|biomechanical]] cues to the cells, which affect cellular function and behavior. Both of these advantages reduce the mismatch of the environment of cells in vitro and in human body, i.e., the cells behave more similarly in vitro as they do in vivo, which improves the value of [[pre-clinical research]] to predict clinical outcomes, thus potentially reducing the failure rate of clinical trials (now >95%).
The advantages of using sMEAs for pre-clinical research are twofold. First, the stiffness of the substrate that the cells are grown on matches more closely the stiffness of the cellular environment in the body. Second, sMEAs enable the application of [[Biomechanics|biomechanical]] cues to the cells, which affect cellular function and behavior. Both of these advantages reduce the mismatch of the environment of cells in vitro and in human body, i.e., the cells behave more similarly in vitro as they do in vivo, which improves the value of [[pre-clinical research]] to predict clinical outcomes, thus potentially reducing the failure rate of clinical trials (now >95%).
 
====Disadvantage====
Line 46 ⟶ 50:
 
===In vivo stretchable MEAs===
Stretchable MEAs have many benefits for [[Implant (medicine)|implantable]] in vivo applications for recording and stimulation of electrophysiological activity from electrogenic biological tissues (most commonly neurons and muscles). Some applications involve only recording of electrophysiological activity, e.g., on the surface of the brain,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Graudejus |first1=Oliver |last2=Barton |first2=Cody |last3=Ponce Wong |first3=Ruben D |last4=Rowan |first4=Cami C |last5=Oswalt |first5=Denise |last6=Greger |first6=Bradley |title=A soft and stretchable bilayer electrode array with independent functional layers for the next generation of brain machine interfaces |journal=Journal of Neural Engineering |date=October 2020 |volume=17 |issue=5 |pages=056023 |doi=10.1088/1741-2552/abb4a5 |pmid=33052886 |pmc=7891917 |bibcode=2020JNEng..17e6023G }}</ref> the spinal cord,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Meacham |first1=Kathleen W. |last2=Giuly |first2=Richard J. |last3=Guo |first3=Liang |last4=Hochman |first4=Shawn |last5=DeWeerth |first5=Stephen P. |title=A lithographically-patterned, elastic multi-electrode array for surface stimulation of the spinal cord |journal=Biomedical Microdevices |date=April 2008 |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=259–269 |doi=10.1007/s10544-007-9132-9 |pmid=17914674 |pmc=2573864 }}</ref> some involve only stimulation of electrophysiological activity, and some both.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rowan |first1=Cami C. |last2=Graudejus |first2=Oliver |last3=Otchy |first3=Timothy M. |title=A Microclip Peripheral Nerve Interface (μcPNI) for Bioelectronic Interfacing with Small Nerves |journal=Advanced Science |date=January 2022 |volume=9 |issue=3 |pages=e2102945 |doi=10.1002/advs.202102945 |pmid=34837353 |pmc=8787429 }}</ref>
 
====Advantages====
The main benefits of using sMEAs for [[in vivo]] applications are twofold. First, they can [[conform]] to the dynamic and often curved surfaces of biological tissues. Second, sMEAs cause significant smaller [[foreign body reaction]] than rigid MEAs because of the reduced mismatch in mechanical properties ([[stiffness]]) between the [[Implant (medicine)|implant]] the tissue.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last1=Boufidis |first1=Dimitris |last2=Garg |first2=Raghav |last3=Angelopoulos |first3=Eugenia |last4=Cullen |first4=D. Kacy |last5=Vitale |first5=Flavia |date=2025-02-21 |title=Bio-inspired electronics: Soft, biohybrid, and "living" neural interfaces |journal=Nature Communications |language=en |volume=16 |issue=1 |pages=1861 |doi=10.1038/s41467-025-57016-0 |pmid=39984447 |issn=2041-1723|pmc=11845577 |bibcode=2025NatCo..16.1861B }}</ref>
 
====Disadvantage====
Line 55 ⟶ 59:
 
==Applications==
===Neural Interfacesinterfaces===
In [[neural interface]]s, sMEAs are utilized to record and stimulate [[neural activity]]. Their stretchability allows them to conform to the brain's surface or penetrate neural tissue without causing significant damage.<ref name=":0" /> This improves the quality of neural recordings and the effectiveness of neural stimulation, which is crucial for applications such as [[brain-machine interfaces]].<ref name=":0" />
 
===EcoGElectrocorticography===
[[Electrocorticography]] (EcoG) with stretchable MEAs offers a less [[Invasive (medical)|invasive]] method for recording electrical activity from the brain's surface. These arrays can conform to the cortical surface, providing high-resolution, stable recordings even during brain movements. This capability is essential for applications such as [[epilepsy]] monitoring and [[brain-computer interfaces]].
 
===Cardiac Monitoringmonitoring===
sMEAs are employed in [[cardiac]] monitoring and therapy. They can be wrapped around the heart to monitor electrical activity or deliver therapeutic electrical impulses. Their [[flexibility]] ensures they remain in contact with the heart's surface despite its constant motion. This application is vital for detecting and treating arrhythmias and other cardiac conditions, providing real-time monitoring and precise intervention.
 
===In Vitrovitro Researchresearch===
sMEAs are used in [[in vitro]] research to study cellular responses under various mechanical conditions. They enable the monitoring and stimulation of cells in a controlled environment, providing insights into cellular behavior and disease mechanisms. This application is particularly useful in drug testing and the development of new therapies.
 
===Soft Roboticsrobotics===
In soft [[robotics]], sMEAs create [[sensors]] and [[actuators]] that can deform in response to external forces. These applications utilize the mechanical resilience and electrical functionality of sMEAs to develop robots capable of navigating complex environments and performing delicate tasks. Soft robotic systems equipped with sMEAs can adapt to various tasks, from medical procedures to industrial [[automation]].
 
Line 76 ⟶ 80:
{{reflist}}
 
[[Category:Neurophysiology]]
{{uncategorized|date=November 2024}}
[[Category:Electrophysiology]]