Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Old XfD multi
|date = 10 June 2019|result = '''delete'''|page = Ring (programming language)}}
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Software|importance=Low}}
}}
==Copy==
Line 14 ⟶ 16:
==Previous deletion==
Our guiding principle in deciding whether to accept drafts is whether it is [[WP:LIKELY]] to be deleted once accepted. This article has been [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language)|previously deleted]] a little over a year ago and the discussion was not pretty. It is unlikly to get the benefit of doubt in a second hearing at AfD. Of the sources I've identified as potential evidence for notability, only InfoWorld was published after the delete discussion. That doesn't strike me as compelling enough to reopen this. {{u|Charmk}}, what has changed since the deletion discussion that would convince AfD participants that this subject is now notable? ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 18:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
:{{u|Kvng}} Beside the InfoWorld article, a Book published by Apress which is a notable publisher, The book is written by one of the contributors to the Ring project who contributed to the project while writing the book. [https://web.archive.org/web/20180527165234/https://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/team.html Ring Team in 2018] - [https://ring-lang.
::{{u|Charmk}}, I've reviewed the deletion discussion and my read is that this is not going to be enough to get a different result. I can ping the participants of the previous discussion here if you want to keep pushing on this. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 19:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
:::{{u|Kvng}} I trust your evaluation, we can wait until an extra references appears then we continue. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 19:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Line 24 ⟶ 26:
(1) Three articles by Dr. Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy (India): [https://www.rangakrish.com/index.php/2021/08/07/first-encounter-with-the-ring-programming-language/], [https://www.rangakrish.com/index.php/2021/08/21/loop-command-in-ring-programming-language/], [https://www.rangakrish.com/index.php/2021/09/04/ring-language-dynamic-behavior-of-classes-and-objects/]
(2) New printed book (In Arabic Language) by Ghanem (Egypt) : [https://ring-lang.
(3) InfoWorld Article by Paul Krill (USA) : [https://www.infoworld.com/article/3572395/ring-language-upgrade-focuses-on-webassembly.html]
Line 33 ⟶ 35:
::The publisher in the second source is known in Egypt, the book writer (Eng. Ghanem) have written many Arabic programming books from 2005 about different programming languages and these books are published by many publishers like [[ar:دار المعارف]] which is well known publisher in the middle east.
::Ring is a free-open source project. We relax our inclusion criteria for free & open source. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 04:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
:::I'm not sure why this page has moved out of draft when there has been no consensus reached, and the most recent comment was ""This was deleted at AfD in July 2019. While more sources have materialized since then, it doesn't appear to be enough to reverse the AfD consensus. See talk page for more details and discussion." [[User:Peterl|peterl]] ([[User talk:Peterl|talk]]) 10:00, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
:::: {{u|Peterl}} This comment is written from over one year. The article is updated after that and I notified the comment writer about these updates three months ago. Then the article is submitted and is accepted by other reviewers after removing the protection that prevent the article creation. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 10:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
:::And regarding [[WP:SPS]], do note "Exercise caution when using such sources: if the information in question is suitable for inclusion, someone else will probably have published it in independent, reliable sources" [[User:Peterl|peterl]] ([[User talk:Peterl|talk]]) 10:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
:::: {{u|Peterl}} In my opinion the references are reliable enough and the information exist in multiple sources. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 10:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
| |||