Content deleted Content added
I fixed the formula so it would express "the total reward from time $ |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 102:
}}
{{hidden end}}Thus, we have an [[unbiased estimator]] of the policy gradient:<math display="block">
\nabla_\theta J(\theta) \approx \frac 1N \sum_{n=1}^N \left[\sum_{t\in 0:T} \nabla_\theta\ln\pi_\theta(A_{t,n}\mid S_{t,n})\sum_{\tau \in t:T} (\gamma^{\tau-t} R_{\tau ,n}) \right]
</math>where the index <math>n</math> ranges over <math>N</math> rollout trajectories using the policy <math>\pi_\theta </math>.
Line 117:
== Variance reduction ==
REINFORCE is an '''on-policy''' algorithm, meaning that the trajectories used for the update must be sampled from the current policy <math>\pi_\theta</math>. This can lead to high variance in the updates, as the returns <math>R(\tau)</math> can vary significantly between trajectories. Many variants of REINFORCE
=== REINFORCE with baseline ===
Line 128:
=== Actor-critic methods ===
{{Main|Actor-critic algorithm}}
If <math display="inline">b_i</math> is chosen well, such that <math display="inline">b_i(S_t) \approx \sum_{\tau \in t:T} (\gamma^\tau R_\tau) = \gamma^
\Big|S_0 = s_0 \right]</math>Note that, as the policy <math>\pi_{\theta_t}</math> updates, the value function <math>V^{\pi_{\theta_i}}(S_t)</math> updates as well, so the baseline should also be updated. One common approach is to train a separate function that estimates the value function, and use that as the baseline. This is one of the [[actor-critic method]]s, where the policy function is the actor and the value function is the critic.
|