Talk:Central African rock python: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m format error
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{AARTalk|class=B|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Anthropology|oral-tradition=yes
}}
}}
{{GLAMARKive}}
{{Talkheader}}
 
{{old move|date=5 June 2022|from=African rock python|destination=Central African rock python|result=moved|link=Special:Permalink/1091925750#Requested move 5 June 2022}}
 
== Improvement needed! ==
 
''Python natalensis'' is a separate species since 1999, which is supported by almost every herpetologist in recent literature and publications! ''Python natalensis'' shows prominent differences in squamation, pattern, habitat, general behavior, reproduction,... Please give ''Python natalensis'' its own article back! For more information take a look at the reference list of the German wiki for [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nördlicher_Felsenpython ''Python sebae''] and [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Südlicher_Felsenpython ''Python natalensis'']. Thank you and good luck! --[[Special:Contributions/77.57.177.59|77.57.177.59]] ([[User talk:77.57.177.59|talk]]) 19:19, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 
:The taxonomy is (still) disputed. Article explains this (and gives both sides). I think we are better showing the traditional taxonomy as the new one has not yet been universally agreed on. And note, the more recent and authorotative sources favor the subspecies, not species labels (check the refs). FYI, the English and French wiki article have always had a subspecies labeling, not full species. Also, Arkive source did as well. The subspecies do intergrade (interbreed) so traditional species concept would consider them same species. In any case, this is discussed in text and only real issue is article naming, etc. Of course, if scientific community every completely agrees on a different taxo, we can change. I doubt it will happen for reasons above.[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 00:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi there! I’m glad to here that you try to get more literature about these two pythons! After reading more about them, I’m sure you will change your mind about the subspecies status. I’m not aware of any reputable herpetologist (scientific and NOT popular scientific or herpetocultural stuff), who doubts the species rank for Python natalensis since 1999. Next to the reptile database [[http://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=Python&species=natalensis&search_param=%28%28genus%3D%27Python%27%2Cexact%29%28species%3D%27natalensis%27%2Cexact%29%29]] here a small selection of publications that I’m speaking about:
*G. J. Alexander: Thermal Biology of the Southern African Python (Python natalensis): Does temperature limit its distribution? In: R. W. Henderson, R. Powell (Hrsg.): Biology of the Boas and Pythons. Eagle Mountain Publishing Company, Eagle Mountain 2007, {{ISBN|978-0-9720154-3-1}}, p. 51–75.
*G. J. Alexander, J. Marais: A Guide to the Reptiles of Southern Africa. Struik Publishers, Cape Town 2007, {{ISBN|978-1-77007-386-9}}, p. 61–65.
*S. Spawls, K. Howell, R. Drewes, J. Ashe: A Field Guide to the Reptiles of East Africa. Academic Press 2002, {{ISBN|0-12-656470-1}}, p. 305–310.
*B. Lanza, A. Nistri: Somali Boidae (genus Eryx Daudin 1803) and Pythonidae (genus Python Daudin 1803) (Reptilia Serpentes). Tropical Zoology 18, 2005, p. 67-136, here a useful link: [[http://www.megasphera.cz/africanvenomoussnakes/images/Herpetologie%20Afriky/Odborné%20články%20k%20stáhnut%C3%AD/Eryx%20Python%20Somalia.pdf]]
*And even Walls elected them to full species rank a year before Broadley1999 officially did: J. G. Walls: The Living Pythons. T. F. H. Publications 1998, {{ISBN|0-7938-0467-1}}, p. 142–146, 166–171
Good luck and thanks for your efforts! --[[Special:Contributions/77.57.177.59|77.57.177.59]] ([[User talk:77.57.177.59|talk]]) 14:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 
:OK. Let me research it...[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 17:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 
===Preliminary notes (research in progress)===
 
[http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=202186 ITIS] has the traditional taxonomy and cites McDiarmid 1999, which seems very well regarded.
 
CITES (trade treaties) seems to still use the traditional taxonomy (although there is discussion of changing it).
 
IUCN does not list python sebae in any fashion (at all).
 
Broadley 1999 is the source of most of the competing species claims (''would like to look at that paper'').
 
Not really finding a killer discussion of taxonomy on the web. Like one that discusses both sides of the question (even if taking a position on which is right). In particular would like to read discussion of the "mixed region" and if the two snakes intergrade (mate).
 
Looking at Google scholar, it seems that papers are published in the 2000s using both species and subspecies descriptions. Actually not really that much activity going on of any sort with python sebae. Definitely a lot less than [[Chrysemys picta]], which had thousands of papers and a similar taxonomy debate.
 
A subjective Google web (in US) searching around for top pages (I looked at first screens, did not quantify) seemed to show more use of subspecies than species. Although certainly some on each side. And Wiki serves as a source for a lot of hobbyist sites, so this is ambiguous.
 
Number of web pages recalled gave 22,000 for "python sebae natelensis" and 21,000 for "python natalensis". So that's a wash...
 
There is a large pythonidae taxo review from 2010 (by a Zherman {{=)|wink}}) that has the species usage. (but it does not really discuss pro and con...I trust papers more even if they take a position if they show both sides and give a reason for why they take a position...)
 
Not crazy about the reptile database as a source.
 
I have not gotten the books mentioned yet or the one paper on distribution of southern one.
 
I also looked at all our en-Wiki lists and the like (list of pythons) and they all have the traditional taxonomy. And the en-Wiki article has always had natalensis as subspecies (we did have a separate article...but it was always as the subspecies...never species).
 
At the end of the day, it is not up to us to decide if Broadley is right/wrong, but to reflect consensus of what is used in science (and even in trade and legislation). I would not want us to be jumping on a new fashion...or stuck behind if really the whole World has moved on. I'm leaning to staying with the article as is, mostly based on ITIS and the usage in English language web. In any case, we do give both sides (in the article) and can probably expand the discussion. The only issue is sort of a Wiki one of what our default is for the article naming.
 
[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 14:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 
:The Somali paper is quite nice in giving an overview of Sebae in general (and regardless of taxo issue). Good reference for a lot of behavior and the Roman tilings and all that. It was reviewed by Broadley and does use his 1999 elevation of the subspecies. Does not add any more on the argument and in Somalia there are no natalensis, so does not discuss co-occurence. Definitely an example of continuing the Broadley usage. It does discuss the issue of a lot of the 20th century literature using the single species system, so it becomes difficult looking at old literature on the African rock python to know which is reffered to.[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 16:39, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 
:This is from the 2010 German python taxo paper in zookeys (in context of a different discussion): "The resurrection of the genus Heleionomus for Python sebae and Python natalensis is unwarranted because the actual status of natalensis and sebae has not been fully resolved and, furthermore, separation from Python would compromise monophyly of the genus Python." (note, though, they do seem to advocate natalensis elevation. just saying they also say not really resolved.)[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 16:48, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 
:I have a research request in to get the Broadley 1999 paper.[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 17:29, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 
:emailed McDiarmid and Broadley (a 2006 email, I could find).[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 18:08, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 
==Cleaning up some old issues==
 
Interesting to see degredations creep in, if I'm away for a while. Several good faith, but negative adds were made. There were some fine ones as well. Just...easy to see cruft or mistakes come in as well.
 
1. The "largest ever" keeps getting added as a found in Florida claim. But I researched this and what actually happened is the largest specimen IN FLORIDA, was found in the Everglades. See: [http://www.nbc-2.com/Global/story.asp?S=12226516]. So cutting this false factoid that keeps coming in. (update, added it to the invasive species section).
 
2. Some comments on snake unlikelihood of attacking humans modified (we had already covered this aspect, new text was not new sourced). Discuss if needed.
 
[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 01:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 
3. (to do) make tables for the gallery view workarounds.
 
Removed inclusion of well documented urban myths of African rocks eating people. There has never been a confirmed report of a human being consumed by an African rock, ever. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.0.131.236|24.0.131.236]] ([[User talk:24.0.131.236|talk]]) 15:07, 6 August 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
Removed the mention of the idiotic theory being floated that an African rock killed two boys in Canada recently. It's not only not verified, it's a ridiculous theory that denies facts. The autopsy report will conclude this definitely. Such speculation has no place in a wiki article. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.0.131.236|24.0.131.236]] ([[User talk:24.0.131.236|talk]]) 15:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Germans have an FA ==
 
Way more sources than we have, many of them in English. Lot of stuff on culture as well. I need to read through it all. Can get by in German, but not fluent. [[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 03:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 
== python blues ==
 
Just looked at the history of this article. We had an IP delete a sentence about evolution and also lost content description. And then a followup gnome merged the rump para into the next para. So you can't even tell what left.
 
Also we got overlinking with, for example, subspecies linked twice in a few first sentences. And a "blue next to blue" confusing link (genus and python). (Note the python genus article would be the place where the word genus is linked if there is a tension.)
 
[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 00:45, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 
== Attacks on humans ==
 
The [[African_rock_python#Attacks|page says]] that :
: <i>There has never been a verified report of a human being consumed</i>.
but [[2013 New Brunswick python attack]] says otherwise.
 
Which is the correct version? X[[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 20:03, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 
On page 27 of "Boas and Pythons of the World" by herpetologist Mark O'Shea, the author mentions an incident in Uganda in 1951 where an African Rock Python swallowed a 13 year old, subsequently regurgitating the victim. Neither of the children in the alleged New Brunswick attack were consumed. [[Special:Contributions/99.242.144.216|99.242.144.216]] ([[User talk:99.242.144.216|talk]]) 08:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 
:Just to clarify on the original question, two kids were killed in New Brunswick, but they were not consumed (eaten) by the pythons. In a 2002 case, a 10-year-old was allegedly swallowed by an African Rock Python, but the snake was not captured, and with nothing but witness accounts the incident was not "verified". A 1973 report of a soldier who was recovered from the stomach of a large python was similarly unverifiable. [[User:Agyle|Agyle]] ([[User talk:Agyle|talk]]) 08:57, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 
== Requested move 30 August 2015 ==
 
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[WP:requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section. ''
 
The result of the move request was: '''moved'''. [[User:Jenks24|Jenks24]] ([[User talk:Jenks24|talk]]) 08:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 
----
 
 
[[:Python sebae]] → {{no redirect|African rock python}} – This very well known snake (one of the largest few snakes in the world by both weight and length) has a well-established and unambiguous common name, so we should use that name as the article title per [[WP:COMMONNAME]] / [[WP:NCFAUNA]]. The suggested destination name already redirects here, and always has since it was created in 2007. As best I can tell, the article has never yet been moved and no prior formal move discussion has occurred. —[[User:BarrelProof|BarrelProof]] ([[User talk:BarrelProof|talk]]) 00:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
*'''Support''', per common name (not to mention common sense, if someone yells at you "Watch out, there's a sebae behind you" you might not move as fast. [[user:Randy Kryn|Randy Kryn]] 14:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
----
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->
 
== External links modified ==
 
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
 
I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[African rock python]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=705576465 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131224100904/http://www.nation.co.ke/news/-/1056/560504/-/4wvt75z/-/index.html to http://www.nation.co.ke/news/-/1056/560504/-/4wvt75z/-/index.html
 
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.
 
{{sourcecheck|checked=true}}
 
Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier;">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green;">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 08:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 
== New Photo for Taxonbox? ==
 
Is there a different photo we can use for the taxonbox? That snake is just grotesquely obese, far beyond the result of even ingesting big meal; many of the body scales don't even meet anymore. The Brevard Zoo photos are just as bad. Any wild photos which would be good? Or just captives that aren't going to die of liver failure in the next few years? [[User:HCA|HCA]] ([[User talk:HCA|talk]]) 17:42, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 
== Natalensis is now a species on its own ==
Line 160 ⟶ 38:
 
:IUCN now shows [https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/13300572/13300582 "Central African python" (''P. sebae'')] and [https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/13300560/13300564 "Southern African Rock Python" (''P. natalensis'')] as two separate species. So does ITIS. ITIS has marked the subspecies names as invalid and the two species-level names as valid. —&#8288;&#8202;&#8288;[[User:BarrelProof|BarrelProof]] ([[User talk:BarrelProof|talk]]) 00:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 
== "Ben Nyaumbe" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect [[Ben Nyaumbe]] should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Ben Nyaumbe]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Plantdrew|Plantdrew]] ([[User talk:Plantdrew|talk]]) 02:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 
== Is this an apex predator? ==
Line 178 ⟶ 52:
* [[:African rock python]] → {{no redirect|Central African rock python}}
* [[:Southern rock python]] → {{no redirect|Southern African rock python}}
– or ''{{-r|Python sebae}}'' and ''{{-r|Python natalensis}}''. ITIS and IUCN show these as separate species with the suggested article names as the primary common names. ITIS has marked the subspecies-level names as invalid and the two species-level names as valid. The {{-r|Southern rock python}} article already includes "African" in the boldfaced common name in its opening sentence. —&#8288;&#8202;&#8288;—⁠ ⁠[[User:BarrelProof|BarrelProof]] ([[User talk:BarrelProof|talk]]) 00:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
: '''Support'''. I don't see Central African rock python at ITIS, only at the IUCN. Reptile database uses Southern African rock python but not Central African rock python. However, before the species split, the two subspecies were commonly known as the Southern and Central African rock python (e.g. [https://africawildtrails.com/danger-zone-the-african-rock-python/ here], [https://www.petmd.com/reptile/species/african-rock-python here] and [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Central+African+rock+python%22&client=firefox-b-d&channel=trow5&sxsrf=ALiCzsYoR-2AxCoATe-71kRH1aVwrleGtA%3A1654580983574&ei=9-aeYurJIsehgQbJy7moDw&ved=0ahUKEwiqoZy-0pr4AhXHUMAKHcllDvUQ4dUDCA0&uact=5&oq=%22Central+African+rock+python%22&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBggAEB4QFjoHCAAQRxCwAzoKCAAQRxCwAxDJAzoECCMQJzoFCC4QgARKBAhBGABKBAhGGABQkwdYvRZgphxoAXABeACAAW6IAacCkgEDMS4ymAEAoAEByAEIwAEB&sclient=gws-wiz others]), so the IUCN is just using the common names of the subspecies for the same snakes at species level in accord with the revised taxonomy. I see know reason not to follow the IUCN. —&nbsp;<span style="font-family:Arial;background:#d6ffe6;border:solid 1px;border-radius:5px;box-shadow:darkcyan 0px 1px 1px;">&nbsp;[[User:Jts1882|Jts1882]]&nbsp;&#124;[[User talk:Jts1882|&nbsp;talk]]&nbsp;</span> 06:01, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] -->
</div><div style="clear:both;"></div>
{{done}} [[User:DrVogel|Dr. Vogel]] ([[User talk:DrVogel|talk]]) 17:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 
==Removed items==
Removed these items, as they will refer to ''Python natalensis'', not ''Python sebae'', or are uncertain:
 
*[[:File:Python's picnic - Flickr - mango atchar.jpg|thumb|right|Constricting a pregnant goat]] [in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe]
*[[:File:Adult Female Python sebae 1.33aspect.jpg|thumb|right|Captive female]] - no provenance, so uncertain (is it identifiable?)
 
* In 1979 in [[Waterberg District Municipality|Waterberg District]], Limpopo Province (then Northern Transvaal), South Africa, a {{cvt|4.5|m|ft}} Central African rock python killed a 13-year-old boy.<ref name=ark9/> The victim died due to suffocation and internal injuries; his body was released by the python after intervention by an adult man some 20 minutes after the attack began.<ref name=ark9/> The victim's head was covered in saliva, and scientists thought "it could have easily succeeded in swallowing" the {{cvt|1.3|m|ft}}, {{Convert|45|kg}} boy had it not been interrupted.<ref name=ark9/>
 
* In 2002 near [[Durban]], South Africa, a 10-year-old boy was reportedly swallowed by a Central African rock python over a three-hour period, as seven other children stayed hidden in a mango tree.<ref name=flanagan/><ref name=ayoob>{{ cite news | title=Boy quiet as snake swallows him | date=23 November 2002 | work=News24 | publisher=24.com | last=Ayoob | first=Zoobair | url=http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Boy-quiet-as-snake-swallows-him-20021123 }}</ref> The animal was not captured and the story could not be verified, although detailed descriptions of the snake's markings and predation technique were reported to have seemed credible to a local snake park operator.<ref name=flanagan>{{cite news | title=Hunt for giant snake that ate 10-year-old Durban boy whole | last=Flanagan | first=Jane | ___location=Johannesburg | date=24 November 2002 | work=The Telegraph | publisher=Telegraph Media Group Limited | url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/southafrica/1414171/Hunt-for-giant-snake-that-ate-10-year-old-Durban-boy-whole.html }}</ref>
 
The attacks by pet pythons at various locations also need to be checked for identification, particularly if they preceed widespread knowledge of there being two species of rock pythons. - [[User:MPF|MPF]] ([[User talk:MPF|talk]]) 22:37, 11 July 2025 (UTC)