Random assignment: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:53, 10 February 2021

Latest revision as of 14:48, 18 July 2025

(26 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Process involving chance used in research for allocating experimental subjects to groups}}

{{Multiple issues|

{{more footnotes|date=May 2016}}

Line 4 ⟶ 5:

}}

'''Random assignment''' or '''random placement''' is an [[experiment]]al technique for assigning [[human subject research|human participants]] or [[animal testing|animal subjects]] to different groups in an experiment (e.g., [[treatment and control groups|a treatment group versus a control group]]) using [[wikt:randomization#Noun|randomization]], such as by a chance procedure (e.g., [[coin flipping|flipping a coin]]) or a [[random number generation|random number generator]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|last=Witte, Robert S.|first=|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/956984834|title=Statistics|publisher=|others=Witte, John S.|yeardate=5 January 2017|isbn=978-1-119-25451-5|edition=11|___location=Hoboken, NJ|pages=5|oclc=956984834}}</ref> This ensures that each participant or subject has an equal chance of being placed in any group.<ref name=":0" /> Random assignment of participants helps to ensure that any differences between and within the groups are not [[systematic error|systematic]] at the outset of the experiment.<ref name=":0" /> Thus, any differences between groups recorded at the end of the experiment can be more confidently attributed to the experimental procedures or treatment.<ref name=":0" />

Random assignment, [[blind experiment|blinding]], and [[scientific control|controlling]] are key aspects of the [[design of experiments]], because they help ensure that the results are not spurious or deceptive via [[confounding]]. This is why [[randomized controlled trial]]s are vital in [[clinical research]], especially ones that can be [[double-blinded]] and [[placebo-controlled]].

Mathematically, there are distinctions between randomization, [[pseudorandomness|pseudorandomization]], and [[low-discrepancy sequence|quasirandomization]], as well as between [[random number generation|random number generators]] and [[pseudorandom number generator]]s. How much these differences matter in experiments (such as [[clinical trial]]s) is a matter of [[design of experiments|trial design]] and [[statistics|statistical]] rigor, which affect [[levels of evidence|evidence grading]]. Studies done with pseudo- or quasirandomization are usually given nearly the same weight as those with true randomization but are viewed with a bit more caution.

Line 21 ⟶ 22:

==Random sampling==

Random sampling is a related, but distinct, process.<ref name="socialresearchmethods.net">{{cite web|url=http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/random.php|title=Social Research Methods - Knowledge Base - Random Selection & Assignment}}</ref> Random sampling is recruiting participants in a way that they represent a larger population.<ref name="socialresearchmethods.net"/> Because most basic statistical tests require the hypothesis of an independent randomly sampled population, random assignment is the desired assignment method because it provides control for all attributes of the members of the samples—in contrast to matching on only one or more variables—and provides the mathematical basis for estimating the likelihood of group equivalence for characteristics one is interested in, both for pretreatment checks on equivalence and the evaluation of post treatment results using inferential statistics. More advanced statistical modeling can be used to adapt the inference to the sampling method.

==History==

Randomization was emphasized in the theory of statistical inference of [[Charles Sanders Peirce|Charles S. Peirce]] in "[[Charles Sanders Peirce bibliography#illus|Illustrations of the Logic of Science]]" (1877–1878) and "[[Charles Sanders Peirce bibliography#SIL|A Theory of Probable Inference]]" (1883). Peirce applied randomization in the Peirce-[[Joseph Jastrow|Jastrow]] experiment on weight perception.

Charles S. Peirce randomly assigned volunteers to a [[blind experiment|blinded]], [[repeated measures design|repeated-measures design]] to evaluate their ability to discriminate weights.<ref name="smalldiff">{{cite journal| author=[[Charles Sanders Peirce]] and [[Joseph Jastrow]]|year=1885|title=On Small Differences in Sensation|url=http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Peirce/small-diffs.htm| journal=Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences|volume=3|pages=73–83}}</ref><ref name="telepathy">{{cite journal|author=Ian Hacking| title=Telepathy: Origins of Randomization in Experimental Design|journal=[[Isis (journal)|Isis]] |volume=79|issue=3|date=September 1988 |pages=427–451|doi=10.1086/354775| s2cid=52201011| author-link=Ian Hacking}}</ref><ref name="stigler">{{cite journal|doi=10.1086/444032|author=Stephen M. Stigler|title=A Historical View of Statistical Concepts in Psychology and Educational Research| journal=American Journal of Education| volume=101|issue=1|date=November 1992|pages=60–70|s2cid=143685203|author-link=Stephen M. Stigler}}</ref><ref name="dehue">{{cite journal|doi=10.1086/383850|author=Trudy Dehue|title=Deception, Efficiency, and Random Groups: Psychology and the Gradual Origination of the Random Group Design|journal=[[Isis (journal)|Isis]]|volume=88|issue=4|date=December 1997|pages=653–673|pmid=9519574|s2cid=23526321|url=https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/71855616/237831.pdf}}</ref>

Peirce's experiment inspired other researchers in psychology and education, which developed a research tradition of [[randomized experiment]]s in laboratories and specialized textbooks in the eighteen-hundreds.<ref name="smalldiff"/><ref name="telepathy"/><ref name="stigler"/><ref name="dehue"/>

Line 78 ⟶ 79:

* [[Charles Sanders Peirce|Charles S. Peirce]], "[[Charles Sanders Peirce bibliography#SIL|A Theory of Probable Inference]]" (1883)

* {{cite journal| author=[[Charles Sanders Peirce]] and [[Joseph Jastrow]]|year=1885|title=On Small Differences in Sensation| journal=Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences|volume=3|pages=73–83|url=http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Peirce/small-diffs.htm}} http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Peirce/small-diffs.htm

* {{cite journal |doi=10.1086/354775 |first=Ian |last=Hacking |author-link=Ian Hacking |title=Telepathy: Origins of Randomization in Experimental Design|journal=[[Isis (journal)|Isis]] |issue=3 |volume=79 |date=September 1988 |pages=427–451 | mr = 1013489 |jstor=234674|s2cid=52201011 }}

* {{cite journal |doi=10.1086/444032 |author=Stephen M. Stigler |title=A Historical View of Statistical Concepts in Psychology and Educational Research |journal=American Journal of Education |volume=101 |issue=1 |date=November 1992 |pages=60–70|s2cid=143685203 |author-link=Stephen M. Stigler }}

* {{cite journal |doi=10.1086/383850 |author=Trudy Dehue |title=Deception, Efficiency, and Random Groups: Psychology and the Gradual Origination of the Random Group Design |journal=[[Isis (journal)|Isis]] |volume=88 |issue=4 |date=December 1997 |pages=653–673 |pmid=9519574|s2cid=23526321 |url=https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/71855616/237831.pdf }}

*''Basic Psychology'' by Gleitman, Fridlund, and Reisberg.

*"What statistical testing is, and what it is not," ''Journal of Experimental Education'', 1993, vol 61, pp.&nbsp;293–316 by Shaver.

Line 86 ⟶ 87:

== External links ==

* Experimental Random Assignment Tool: {{usurped|1=[httphttps://wwwweb.archive.org/web/20130620135427/http://researchtool.org/ Random assignment tool - Experimental]}}

{{Statistics|collection|state=collapsed}}