Talk:Clear Linux OS: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Leo Navis (talk | contribs)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
 
{{WikiProject Linux |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Computing |class=Stub |importance=Low |free-software= |free-software-importance= |software=yes }}
}}
 
== Strange distro ==
Line 43 ⟶ 44:
::{{ping|0mtwb9gd5wx}} Further reasoning
::I don't see for example why it is noteworthy that Mixer doesn't pack as RPM. Most linux-distros do not use RPM, so why would we mention that Clear Linux doesn't either?
::: old ''Clear Linux OS'' used RPM, thus it is mentioned. .... [[User:0mtwb9gd5wx|0mtwb9gd5wx]] ([[User talk:0mtwb9gd5wx|talk]]) 21:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
::::Okay. That still doesn't make it noteworthy imho. This shouldn't be a Clear Linux changelog. --[[User:Leo Navis|Leo Navis]] ([[User talk:Leo Navis|talk]]) 19:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
::Telemetry can be turned off entirely... well great, but imho not noteworthy.
:::Privacy & 2 use-cases: cloud & desktop, most people would not want everything you do to break [[General Data Protection Regulation|GDPR]] .... [[User:0mtwb9gd5wx|0mtwb9gd5wx]] ([[User talk:0mtwb9gd5wx|talk]]) 21:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
::::Alright. So we could put a sentence like "Clear Linux OS uses some telemetry, which can however be turned off" in. --[[User:Leo Navis|Leo Navis]] ([[User talk:Leo Navis|talk]]) 19:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
::Isn't Autproxy what Libproxy does? That does not seem very special.
::''Function Multiversioning: from runtime CPU architecture detection allows architecture optimization'' - I do not know what that sentence is supposed to mean. So I checked the source, only to find out that the features-section is basically copied from there. See [https://web.archive.org/web/20210831125812/https://itsfoss.com/clear-linux/ It's foss source]
::However, I did not find this specific sentence or what it is supposed to mean there. So for now, I will remove it. --[[User:Leo Navis|Leo Navis]] ([[User talk:Leo Navis|talk]]) 16:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
:::Okay, I did find it now. ''Function Multiversioning: It allows the optimization of a function for multiple architectures and their executions when the binary detects the architecture at runtime.'' That's implemented in GCC since 2015 (version 4.8). I do not think that's noteworthy at all. --[[User:Leo Navis|Leo Navis]] ([[User talk:Leo Navis|talk]]) 17:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
::::I think its noteworthy because this makes ''Clear Linux OS'' different. .... [[User:0mtwb9gd5wx|0mtwb9gd5wx]] ([[User talk:0mtwb9gd5wx|talk]]) 21:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 
Also:::::It wedoes shouldnot probablymake beit consistentdifferent howfrom toany spell "Clearother Linux OS" - with a *distro, assince Intelthis does,function oris without. I'm fineimplemented eitherin wayGCC, butwhich itis shouldused beby consistent; since it's officially with the star, I guess we should spell itevery likesingle thatone asof wellthem. --[[User:Leo Navis|Leo Navis]] ([[User talk:Leo Navis|talk]]) 1719:1131, 2930 September 2021 (UTC)
::Also we should probably be consistent how to spell "Clear Linux OS" - with a *, as Intel does, or without. I'm fine either way, but it should be consistent; since it's officially with the star, I guess we should spell it like that as well. --[[User:Leo Navis|Leo Navis]] ([[User talk:Leo Navis|talk]]) 17:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
:::I like "Clear Linux OS", because "*" refers to the sometimes missing footnotes by Intel and no article uses them .... [[User:0mtwb9gd5wx|0mtwb9gd5wx]] ([[User talk:0mtwb9gd5wx|talk]]) 21:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|0mtwb9gd5wx}} No article may be. But it is called "Clear Linux* OS" on the official site. Either way, lets take one, and maybe put the other in as a variant way of spelling. --[[User:Leo Navis|Leo Navis]] ([[User talk:Leo Navis|talk]]) 19:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Leo Navis}} Some responses ABOVE .... [[User:0mtwb9gd5wx|0mtwb9gd5wx]] ([[User talk:0mtwb9gd5wx|talk]]) 21:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 
== Indiscriminate links ==
Line 57 ⟶ 66:
::: Perhaps sections that discuss '''Documentation''' and '''Community''' with cited URLs ? .... [[User:0mtwb9gd5wx|0mtwb9gd5wx]] ([[User talk:0mtwb9gd5wx|talk]]) 16:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
::::A single link to the official page is all we need on that front, really. We don't do sections with maps for software documentation. In the ''External links'' section you can add a few (only a few, maybe 2, 3, 4) links like the official web page (1 link only), the GitHub page, maybe Twitter. That's it. [[User:MarioGom|MarioGom]] ([[User talk:MarioGom|talk]]) 16:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 
== This needs some reworking ==
 
Since I didn't get any sensible counter-arguments, I swapped the Features-section. {{ping|0mtwb9gd5wx|MarioGom}} There are a bunch of cite warnings below the article by now. Why? --[[User:Leo Navis|Leo Navis]] ([[User talk:Leo Navis|talk]]) 14:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 
:{{u|Leo Navis}}: Fixed them. [[User:MarioGom|MarioGom]] ([[User talk:MarioGom|talk]]) 16:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 
== Competitors ==
 
Does that section follow any particular ranking? If not, I will rank them alphabetically and maybe add Mocaccino Micro (when the Mocaccino article's ready). [[User:Leo Navis|Leo Navis]] ([[User talk:Leo Navis|talk]]) 10:18, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
 
== Intel has discontinued Clear Linux ==
 
[https://community.clearlinux.org/t/all-good-things-come-to-an-end-shutting-down-clear-linux-os/10716 Intel has announced] that they will discontinue Clear Linux. [[User:FinlayDaG33k|FinlayDaG33k]] ([[User talk:FinlayDaG33k|talk]]) 23:17, 18 July 2025 (UTC)