Objection to the consideration of a question: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:25, 2 March 2008

Latest revision as of 14:01, 19 July 2025

(41 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Type of motion in parliamentary procedure}}

'''Objection to the consideration of a question''' is a method in [[parliamentary procedure]] of preventing a motion from coming before the assembly.<ref>RONR (10th ed.) p. 258</ref> It requires a two-thirds vote to be sustained and is not debatable. It is classed as an [[incidental motion]].

{{About|a motion in parliamentary procedure|other uses of "Objection"|Objection (disambiguation){{!}}Objection}}

__NOTOC__

{{infobox motion

| name = Objection to the consideration of a question (RONR)

| class = I

| inorder = When another ''has been assigned'' the floor, until debate has begun or a subsidiary motion has been stated by the chair

| seconded = No

| debatable = No

| amendable = No

| voterequired = Two-thirds against consideration sustains objection

| reconsidered = Negative vote (sustaining objection) only

}}

In [[parliamentary procedure]], an '''objection to the consideration of a question''' is a [[Motion (parliamentary procedure)|motion]] that is adopted to prevent an original [[main motion]] from coming before the [[Deliberative assembly|assembly]]. This motion is different from an objection to a [[unanimous consent]] request.

==Explanation and use==

This objection may be applied only to an original main motion, that is, a main motion that brings a new substantive issue before the assembly, as opposed to an incidental main motion. The objection may be raised only before debate has begun on the motion, as the purpose is to completely suppress debate on the motion.

If a member feels that an original main motion should not be considered, an objection to the consideration of a question could be made.<ref>{{Cite book|title = [[Robert's Rules of Order]] Newly Revised|last = Robert|first = Henry M.|publisher = Da Capo Press|year = 2011|isbn = 978-0-306-82020-5|___location = Philadelphia, PA|pages = 267|edition = 11th|display-authors = et al.}}</ref> It is often used to prevent an embarrassing question from being introduced and debated in the assembly.

This motion is not recognized in [[The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure]] and is criticized for being confusing. The ''Standard Code'' offers alternative motions for accomplishing the same purpose. <ref>Standard Code (4th ed.), p. 233-234.</ref>

According to ''[[Robert's Rules of Order]] Newly Revised'' (RONR), this motion is not debatable and requires a two-thirds vote against consideration.<ref name=":0">{{Harvard citation no brackets|Robert|2011|p = 268}}</ref> This objection may be applied only to an original main motion, that is, a main motion that brings a new substantive issue before the assembly,.<ref asname=":0" opposed to an incidental main motion./> The objection may be raised only before debate has begun on the motion, as the purpose is to completely suppress debate on the motion.<ref name=":0" />

==References==

{{reflist}}

According to ''[[Mason's Manual of Legislative Procedure]]'', the purpose of the objection to consideration is to bar from discussion or consideration "any matter that is considered irrelevant, contentious or unprofitable, or that, for any reason, is thought not advisable to discuss."<ref>{{cite parl|title=MAS|edition=2000|year=2000|pages=218}}</ref>

This motion is different from an objection to a unanimous consent request.<ref name=":0" />

[[Category:Parliamentary procedure]]

This motion is not recognized in ''[[The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure]]'' anddoes isnot criticizedhave forthis beingmotion confusing. The ''Standard Code''and offersprovides alternative motions for accomplishing the same purpose. <ref>Standard{{cite Code (parl|title=TSC|edition=4th ed.), p. 233-234.|pages=233–234}}</ref>

== Improper use of tabling a motion ==

Using the rules in RONR, a main motion is improperly killed by [[Table (parliamentary procedure)|tabling]] it. In this case, before debate has begun, it would have been proper to make an objection to the consideration of the question.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.robertsrules.com/faq.html#13|title = Frequently Asked Questions about RONR (Question 13)|date = 2011|access-date = 2016-02-19|website = The Official Robert's Rules of Order Web Site|publisher = The Robert's Rules Association|last = Robert III|first = Henry M.|archive-date = 2018-12-24|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20181224205021/http://www.robertsrules.com/faq.html#13|url-status = dead}}</ref>

== See also ==

* [[Debate (parliamentary procedure)]]

* [[Postpone indefinitely]]

* [[Previous question]]

* [[Table (parliamentary procedure)]]

==References==

{{reflist}}

<br>{{Parliamentary Procedure}}

[[Category:Incidental motions]]

{{law-stub}}