Talk:Object-oriented programming: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
m Reverted edits by 212.47.240.133 (talk) to last version by Mathnerd314159
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 56:
:Meanwhile, I'm not aware of any widely-used languages that implement a purely functional object system and identify themselves as object-oriented. OOHaskell involves mutable fields; [[NixOS|Nix]] has object-like inheritance structures but doesn't describe itself as OO. So while the paradigm doesn't demand imperative semantics, its practical manifestations nearly always involve them.
:It would be great to include examples of exceptions in the article for balance, like with the subsection on Go leaving out inheritance, but without any clear, well-known examples, it's hard to argue the imperative association is optional. [[User:Mathnerd314159|Mathnerd314159]] ([[User talk:Mathnerd314159|talk]]) 17:43, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
 
== https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSBw9R6KQ/ ==
 
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSBw9R6KQ/ [[Special:Contributions/212.47.240.133|212.47.240.133]] ([[User talk:212.47.240.133|talk]]) 18:01, 21 July 2025 (UTC)